Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 22
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Davy, C. M. and Whitear, A. K. 2016. Feasibility and pitfalls ofex situmanagement to mitigate the effects of an environmentally persistent pathogen. Animal Conservation, p. n/a.

    Dawson, Jeff Patel, Freisha Griffiths, Richard A. and Young, Richard P. 2016. Assessing the global zoo response to the amphibian crisis through 20-year trends in captive collections. Conservation Biology, Vol. 30, Issue. 1, p. 82.

    Keulartz, Jozef 2016. Should the Lion Eat Straw Like the Ox? Animal Ethics and the Predation Problem. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, Vol. 29, Issue. 5, p. 813.

    McGowan, Philip J.K. Traylor-Holzer, Kathy and Leus, Kristin 2016. IUCN Guidelines for Determining When and How Ex Situ Management Should Be Used in Species Conservation. Conservation Letters,

    Terrell, Kimberly A. Crosier, Adrienne E. Wildt, David E. O'Brien, Stephen J. Anthony, Nicola M. Marker, Laurie and Johnson, Warren E. 2016. Continued decline in genetic diversity among wild cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) without further loss of semen quality. Biological Conservation, Vol. 200, p. 192.

    Arnet, Matthew Santos, Bernardo Brockerhoff, Eckehard G. Pelser, Pieter B. Ecroyd, Chris and Clemens, John 2015. Importance of arboreta for ex situ conservation of threatened trees. Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 24, Issue. 14, p. 3601.

    Cavender, Nicole Westwood, Murphy Bechtoldt, Catherine Donnelly, Gerard Oldfield, Sara Gardner, Martin Rae, David and McNamara, William 2015. Strengthening the conservation value of ex situ tree collections. Oryx, Vol. 49, Issue. 03, p. 416.

    Davis, Kate Smit, Martin F. Kidd, Martin Sharrock, Suzanne and Allenstein, Pamela 2015. An access and benefit-sharing awareness survey for botanic gardens: Are they prepared for the Nagoya Protocol?. South African Journal of Botany, Vol. 98, p. 148.

    Ensslin, Andreas Tschöpe, Okka Burkart, Michael and Joshi, Jasmin 2015. Fitness decline and adaptation to novel environments in ex situ plant collections: Current knowledge and future perspectives. Biological Conservation, Vol. 192, p. 394.

    Ettling, Jeff and Schmidt, Fabian 2015. Introduction to Reptile Conservation. International Zoo Yearbook, Vol. 49, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Miao, Ying-Chun Su, Jian-Rong Zhang, Zhi-Jun Lang, Xue-Dong Liu, Wan-De and Li, Shuai-Feng 2015. Microsatellite markers indicate genetic differences between cultivated and natural populations of endangeredTaxus yunnanensis. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, Vol. 177, Issue. 3, p. 450.

    Silla, Aimee J. Keogh, Leesa M. and Byrne, Phillip G. 2015. Antibiotics and oxygen availability affect the short-term storage of spermatozoa from the critically endangered booroolong frog, Litoria booroolongensis. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, Vol. 27, Issue. 8, p. 1147.

    Tapley, Benjamin Bradfield, Kay S. Michaels, Christopher and Bungard, Mike 2015. Amphibians and conservation breeding programmes: do all threatened amphibians belong on the ark?. Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 24, Issue. 11, p. 2625.

    Fa, J. E. Gusset, M. Flesness, N. and Conde, D. A. 2014. Zoos have yet to unveil their full conservation potential. Animal Conservation, Vol. 17, Issue. 2, p. 97.

    Franklin, Donald C. Reside, April E. and Garnett, Stephen T. 2014. Applied Studies in Climate Adaptation.

    Gusset, Markus Fa, John E. and Sutherland, William J. 2014. A horizon scan for species conservation by zoos and aquariums. Zoo Biology, p. n/a.

    Martin, T. E. Lurbiecki, H. and Mooers, A. O. 2014. The economic geography ofex situconservation. Animal Conservation, Vol. 17, Issue. 2, p. 104.

    Cires, Eduardo De Smet, Yannick Cuesta, Candela Goetghebeur, Paul Sharrock, Suzanne Gibbs, Douglas Oldfield, Sara Kramer, Andrea and Samain, Marie-Stéphanie 2013. Gap analyses to support ex situ conservation of genetic diversity in Magnolia, a flagship group. Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 22, Issue. 3, p. 567.

    Hinton, Mitchell G. Bendelow, Annie Lantz, Samantha Wey, Tina W. Schoen, Lee Brockett, Robin and Karubian, Jordan 2013. Patterns of aggression among captive american flamingos (Phoenicopterus ruber). Zoo Biology, Vol. 32, Issue. 4, p. 445.

    Hogg, Carolyn J. 2013. Preserving Australian native fauna: zoo-based breeding programs as part of a more unified strategic approach. Australian Journal of Zoology, Vol. 61, Issue. 1, p. 101.


Bring the captive closer to the wild: redefining the role of ex situ conservation

  • Diana J. Pritchard (a1), John E. Fa (a2), Sara Oldfield (a3) and Stuart R. Harrop (a4)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 07 November 2011

In situ conservation is central to contemporary global biodiversity protection and is the predominant emphasis of international regulation and funding strategies. Ex situ approaches, in contrast, have been relegated to a subsidiary role and their direct contributions to conservation have been limited. We draw on a variety of sources to make the case for an enhanced role for ex situ conservation. We note the advances occurring within institutions specializing in ex situ conservation and stress that, although much remains to be done, many constraints are being addressed. We argue that the evidence of increasing extinction rates, exacerbated by climate change, challenges the wisdom of a heavy dependence on in situ strategies and necessitates increased development of ex situ approaches. A number of different techniques that enable species and their habitats to survive should now be explored. These could build on the experience of management systems that have already demonstrated the effective integration of in situ and ex situ techniques and hybrid approaches. For organizations specializing in ex situ conservation to become more effective, however, they will require tangible support from the institutions of global biodiversity governance. Resistance is anticipated because in situ conservation is entrenched through powerful groups and organizations that exert influence on global conservation policy and facilitate the flow of funding. The chasm that has traditionally divided in situ and ex situ approaches may diminish as approaches are combined. Moreover, the relentless loss of the ‘wild’ may soon render the in situ / ex situ distinction misleading, or even obsolete.

Corresponding author
*University of Sussex, School of Global Studies, Sussex House, BN1 9RH, Sussex, UK. E-mail
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

M. Bakkenes , J.R.M. Alkemade , F. Ihle , R. Leemans & J.B. Latour (2002) Assessing effects of forecasted climate change on the diversity and distribution of European higher plants for 2050. Global Change Biology, 8, 390407.

A. Balmford , G.M. Mace & N. Leader-Williams (1996) Designing the ark: setting priorities for captive breeding. Conservation Biology, 10, 719727.

D.A. Burney & L.P. Burney (2007) Paleoecology and “inter-situ” restoration on Kaua’i, Hawai’i. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 5, 483490.

T.J. Cade & C.G. Jones (2002) Progress in restoration of the Mauritius Kestrel. Conservation Biology, 7, 169175.

S. Christie (2010) Why keep tigers in zoos? In Tigers of the World: The Science, Politics and Conservation of Panthera tigris (eds R. Tilson & P. Nyhus ), pp. 205–214. Elsevier, London, UK.

R.E. Green , Y.C. Collingham , S.G. Willis , R.D. Gregory , K.W. Smith & B. Huntley (2008) Performance of climate envelope models in retrodicting recent changes in bird population size from observed climatic change. Biology Letters, 4, 599602.

R.D. Gregory , S.G. Willis , F. Jiguet P. Voříšek , A. Klvaňová , A. van Strien . (2009) An indicator of the impacts of climate change on European bird populations. PLoS One, 4, e4678. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004678

J.J. Groombridge , C.G. Jones , M.W. Bruford & R.A. Nichols (2000) Conservation biology: ‘ghost’ alleles of the Mauritius kestrel. Nature, 403, 616.

I.A. Hanski & M.E. Gilpin (1991) Metapopulation dynamics: brief history and conceptual domain. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 42, 316.

K. Havens , P. Vitt , M. Maunder , E.O. Guerrant Jr & K. Dixons (2006) Ex situ plant conservation and beyond. BioScience, 56, 525531.

W. Jetz , D.S. Wilcove & A.P. Dobson (2007) Projected impacts of climate and land-use change on the global diversity of birds. PLoS Biology, 5(6), e157.

A.T. Kramer & K. Havens (2009) Plant conservation genetics in a changing world. Trends in Plant Science, 14, 599607.

R. Ladle & P. Jepson (2008) Towards a biocultural theory of avoided extinction. Conservation Letters, 1, 111118.

J. McLachlan , J. Hellmann & M. Schwartz (2007) A framework for debate of assisted migration in an era of climate change. Conservation Biology, 21, 297302.

S.F. Oldfield (2009) Botanic gardens and the conservation of tree species. Trends in Plant Science, 14, 581583.

P. Opdam & D. Wascher (2004) Climate change meets habitat fragmentation: linking landscape and biogeographical scale levels in research and conservation. Biological Conservation, 117, 285297.

J.A. Pounds , M.P. Fogden & J.H. Campbell (1999) Biological response to climate change on a tropical mountain. Nature, 398, 611615.

P. Rees (2005) The EC zoos directive: a lost opportunity to implement the convention on biological diversity. Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy, 8, 5162.

F.A. Smith , S.K. Lyons , S.K.M. Ernest , K.E. Jones , D.M. Kaufman , T. Dayan . (2003) Body mass of late Quaternary mammals. Ecology, 84, 34033403.

W. Thuiller (2007) Biodiversity: climate change and the ecologist. Nature, 448, 550552.

W. Thuiller , O. Broennimann , G. Hughes , J.R.M. Alkemade , G.F. Midgley & F. Corsi (2006) Vulnerability of African mammals to anthropogenic climate change under conservative land transformation assumptions. Global Change Biology, 12, 424440.

C.D. Thomas , S.E. Williams , A. Cameron , R.E. Green , M. Bakkenes , L.J. Beaumont . (2004) Biodiversity conservation: uncertainty in predictions of extinction risk/effects of changes in climate and land-use/climate change and extinction risk (reply). Nature, 427, 145148.

G.-R. Walther , E. Post , P. Convey , A. Menzel , C. Parmesan , T.J.C. Beebee . (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature, 416, 389395.

G. Walther , S. Berger & M.T. Sykes (2005) An ecological ‘footprint’ of climate change. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 272, 14271432.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *