Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Bring the captive closer to the wild: redefining the role of ex situ conservation

  • Diana J. Pritchard (a1), John E. Fa (a2), Sara Oldfield (a3) and Stuart R. Harrop (a4)
Abstract
Abstract

In situ conservation is central to contemporary global biodiversity protection and is the predominant emphasis of international regulation and funding strategies. Ex situ approaches, in contrast, have been relegated to a subsidiary role and their direct contributions to conservation have been limited. We draw on a variety of sources to make the case for an enhanced role for ex situ conservation. We note the advances occurring within institutions specializing in ex situ conservation and stress that, although much remains to be done, many constraints are being addressed. We argue that the evidence of increasing extinction rates, exacerbated by climate change, challenges the wisdom of a heavy dependence on in situ strategies and necessitates increased development of ex situ approaches. A number of different techniques that enable species and their habitats to survive should now be explored. These could build on the experience of management systems that have already demonstrated the effective integration of in situ and ex situ techniques and hybrid approaches. For organizations specializing in ex situ conservation to become more effective, however, they will require tangible support from the institutions of global biodiversity governance. Resistance is anticipated because in situ conservation is entrenched through powerful groups and organizations that exert influence on global conservation policy and facilitate the flow of funding. The chasm that has traditionally divided in situ and ex situ approaches may diminish as approaches are combined. Moreover, the relentless loss of the ‘wild’ may soon render the in situ / ex situ distinction misleading, or even obsolete.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*University of Sussex, School of Global Studies, Sussex House, BN1 9RH, Sussex, UK. E-mail dp230@sussex.ac.uk
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

M. Bakkenes , J.R.M. Alkemade , F. Ihle , R. Leemans & J.B. Latour (2002) Assessing effects of forecasted climate change on the diversity and distribution of European higher plants for 2050. Global Change Biology, 8, 390407.

A. Balmford , G.M. Mace & N. Leader-Williams (1996) Designing the ark: setting priorities for captive breeding. Conservation Biology, 10, 719727.

D.A. Burney & L.P. Burney (2007) Paleoecology and “inter-situ” restoration on Kaua’i, Hawai’i. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 5, 483490.

T.J. Cade & C.G. Jones (2002) Progress in restoration of the Mauritius Kestrel. Conservation Biology, 7, 169175.

S. Christie (2010) Why keep tigers in zoos? In Tigers of the World: The Science, Politics and Conservation of Panthera tigris (eds R. Tilson & P. Nyhus ), pp. 205–214. Elsevier, London, UK.

R.E. Green , Y.C. Collingham , S.G. Willis , R.D. Gregory , K.W. Smith & B. Huntley (2008) Performance of climate envelope models in retrodicting recent changes in bird population size from observed climatic change. Biology Letters, 4, 599602.

R.D. Gregory , S.G. Willis , F. Jiguet P. Voříšek , A. Klvaňová , A. van Strien . (2009) An indicator of the impacts of climate change on European bird populations. PLoS One, 4, e4678. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004678

J.J. Groombridge , C.G. Jones , M.W. Bruford & R.A. Nichols (2000) Conservation biology: ‘ghost’ alleles of the Mauritius kestrel. Nature, 403, 616.

I.A. Hanski & M.E. Gilpin (1991) Metapopulation dynamics: brief history and conceptual domain. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 42, 316.

K. Havens , P. Vitt , M. Maunder , E.O. Guerrant Jr & K. Dixons (2006) Ex situ plant conservation and beyond. BioScience, 56, 525531.

W. Jetz , D.S. Wilcove & A.P. Dobson (2007) Projected impacts of climate and land-use change on the global diversity of birds. PLoS Biology, 5(6), e157.

A.T. Kramer & K. Havens (2009) Plant conservation genetics in a changing world. Trends in Plant Science, 14, 599607.

R. Ladle & P. Jepson (2008) Towards a biocultural theory of avoided extinction. Conservation Letters, 1, 111118.

J. McLachlan , J. Hellmann & M. Schwartz (2007) A framework for debate of assisted migration in an era of climate change. Conservation Biology, 21, 297302.

S.F. Oldfield (2009) Botanic gardens and the conservation of tree species. Trends in Plant Science, 14, 581583.

P. Opdam & D. Wascher (2004) Climate change meets habitat fragmentation: linking landscape and biogeographical scale levels in research and conservation. Biological Conservation, 117, 285297.

J.A. Pounds , M.P. Fogden & J.H. Campbell (1999) Biological response to climate change on a tropical mountain. Nature, 398, 611615.

P. Rees (2005) The EC zoos directive: a lost opportunity to implement the convention on biological diversity. Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy, 8, 5162.

F.A. Smith , S.K. Lyons , S.K.M. Ernest , K.E. Jones , D.M. Kaufman , T. Dayan . (2003) Body mass of late Quaternary mammals. Ecology, 84, 34033403.

W. Thuiller (2007) Biodiversity: climate change and the ecologist. Nature, 448, 550552.

W. Thuiller , O. Broennimann , G. Hughes , J.R.M. Alkemade , G.F. Midgley & F. Corsi (2006) Vulnerability of African mammals to anthropogenic climate change under conservative land transformation assumptions. Global Change Biology, 12, 424440.

C.D. Thomas , S.E. Williams , A. Cameron , R.E. Green , M. Bakkenes , L.J. Beaumont . (2004) Biodiversity conservation: uncertainty in predictions of extinction risk/effects of changes in climate and land-use/climate change and extinction risk (reply). Nature, 427, 145148.

G.-R. Walther , E. Post , P. Convey , A. Menzel , C. Parmesan , T.J.C. Beebee . (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature, 416, 389395.

G. Walther , S. Berger & M.T. Sykes (2005) An ecological ‘footprint’ of climate change. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 272, 14271432.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Oryx
  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 23
Total number of PDF views: 154 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1508 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 30th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.