Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Co-production for fundamental change: a response to Sutherland et al.

  • Anna Salomaa (a1)
  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Co-production for fundamental change: a response to Sutherland et al.
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Co-production for fundamental change: a response to Sutherland et al.
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Co-production for fundamental change: a response to Sutherland et al.
      Available formats
      ×
Abstract
Copyright
References
Hide All
Adams, W.M. & Sandbrook, C. (2013) Conservation, evidence and policy. Oryx, 47, 329335.
Bennett, N.J., Roth, R., Klain, S.C., Chan, K., Christie, P., Clark, D.A. et al. (2017) Conservation social science: understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation. Biological Conservation, 5, 93108.
Jasanoff, S. (2004) States of knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order. Routledge, London, UK.
Paloniemi, R., Hujala, T., Rantala, S., Harlio, A., Salomaa, A., Primmer, E. et al. (2018) Integrating social and ecological knowledge for targeting voluntary biodiversity conservation. Conservation Letters, 11, e12340.
Salomaa, A., Paloniemi, R., Hujala, T., Rantala, S., Arponen, A. & Niemelä, J. (2016) The use of knowledge in evidence-informed voluntary conservation of Finnish forests. Forest Policy and Economics, 73, 9098.
Sutherland, W.J., Shackelford, G. & Rose, D.C. (2017) Collaborating with communities: co-production or co-assessment? Oryx, 51, 569570.
van der Hel, S. (2016) New science for global sustainability? The institutionalisation of knowledge co-production in Future Earth. Environmental Science and Policy, 61, 165175.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Oryx
  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed