Skip to main content
×
Home

Correct framing of biodiversity offsets and conservation: a response to Apostolopoulou & Adams

  • Amrei von Hase (a1) and Kerry ten Kate (a1)
Abstract

We read with great interest the opinions of Apostolopoulou & Adams (2015) on biodiversity offsetting. We agree with the authors that offsetting has more profound implications than a technical approach to the subject would suggest. Our experience with developments on the mitigation of impacts on biodiversity in government policy, financial lenders’ safeguards and corporate practice is that the political, economic, social and financial implications weigh just as heavily in decision-makers’ minds as the technical ones that Apostolopoulou & Adams raise (IFC, 2012; BBOP, 2012b; ten Kate & Crowe, 2014; IUCN, 2016; Maron et al., 2016b). The governments, companies and communities working with scientists on the mitigation hierarchy regard biodiversity offsets as one of many tools available not only for conservation but also for risk management, social and economic engagement and benefit-sharing, land-use and landscape-level planning, and sustainable development (IFC, 2012; CSBI, 2015).

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Correct framing of biodiversity offsets and conservation: a response to Apostolopoulou & Adams
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Correct framing of biodiversity offsets and conservation: a response to Apostolopoulou & Adams
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Correct framing of biodiversity offsets and conservation: a response to Apostolopoulou & Adams
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
(Corresponding author) E-mail avonhase@forest-trends.org
References
Hide All
Apostolopoulou E. & Adams W.M. (2015) Biodiversity offsetting and conservation: reframing nature to save it. Oryx, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0030605315000782.
BBC News (2014) Destruction of ancient woodland ‘highly unlikely’. Http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-25599249 [accessed 24 September 2016].
BBOP (Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme) (2012a) Resource Paper: Limits to What Can Be Offset. Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme, Washington, DC, USA. Http://www.forest-trends.org/documents/files/doc_3128.pdf [accessed 23 September 2016].
BBOP (Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme) (2012b) Standard on Biodiversity Offsets. Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme, Washington, DC, USA. Http://www.forest-trends.org/documents/files/doc_3078.pdf [accessed 23 September 2016].
BBOP (Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme) (2013) To No Net Loss and Beyond: An Overview of the Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme. Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme, Washington, DC, USA. Http://www.forest-trends.org/documents/files/doc_3319.pdf [accessed 23 September 2016].
Brownlie S. & Botha M. (2009) Biodiversity offsets: adding to the conservation estate, or “no net loss”? Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 27, 227231.
Bull J.W., Gordon A., Law E.A., Suttle K.B. & Milner-Gulland E.J. (2014) Importance of baseline specification in evaluating conservation interventions and achieving no net loss of biodiversity. Conservation Biology, 28, 799809.
CSBI (Cross-Sector Biodiversity Initiative) (2015) A Cross-sector Guide for Implementing the Mitigation Hierarchy. Cross Sector Biodiversity Initiative, London, UK. Http://www.csbi.org.uk/tools-and-guidance/mitigation-hierarchy [accessed 25 September 2016].
Defra (Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs) (2016) Consultation Outcome: Biodiversity Offsetting in England: Summary of Responses. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, London, UK. Http://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/biodiversity-offsetting-in-england [accessed 23 September 2016].
European Commission (2014) No Net Loss. Http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/nnl/index_en.htm [accessed 24 September 2016].
Gordon A., Bull J.W., Wilcox C. & Maron M. (2015) FORUM: perverse incentives risk undermining biodiversity offset policies. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52, 532537.
IFC (International Finance Corporation) (2012) Performance Standard 6: Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Management of Living Natural Resources. International Finance Corporation, Washington, DC, USA. Http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/bff0a28049a790d6b835faa8c6a8312a/PS6_English_2012.pdf?MOD=AJPERES [accessed 24 September 2016].
IUCN (2016) Draft Biodiversity Offsets Policy. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Http://www.iucn.org/theme/business-and-biodiversity/resources/browse-conservation-issue/biodiversity-offsets [accessed 24 September 2016].
Maron M., Hobbs R., Moilanen A., Matthews J.W., Christie K., Gardner T.A. et al. (2012) Are restoration offsets Faustian bargains? Restoration realities in the context of biodiversity offset policies. Biological Conservation, 155, 141148.
Maron M., Rhodes J.R. & Gibbons P. (2013) Calculating the benefit of conservation actions. Conservation Letters, 6, 359367.
Maron M., Gordon A., Mackey B.G., Possingham H.P. & Watson J.E.M. (2016a) Interactions between biodiversity offsets and protected area commitments: avoiding perverse outcomes. Conservation Letters, in press, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/conl.12222.
Maron M., Ives C.D., Kujala H., Bull J.W., Maseyk F.J.F., Bekessy S. et al. (2016b) Taming a wicked problem: resolving controversies in biodiversity offsetting. BioScience, in press, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw038.
McDonald-Madden E., Gordon A., Wintle B.A., Walker S., Grantham H., Carvalho S. et al. (2009) “True” conservation progress. Science, 323, 4344.
NRC (National Research Council) (2001) Compensating for Wetland Losses under the Clean Water Act. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. Http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10134/compensating-for-wetland-losses-under-the-clean-water-act [accessed 20 September 2016].
Pilgrim J.D., Brownlie S., Ekstrom J.M.M., Gardner T.A., von Hase A., ten Kate K. et al. (2013) A process for assessing offsetability of biodiversity impacts. Conservation Letters, 6, 376384.
ten Kate K. & Crowe M.L.A. (2014) Biodiversity Offsets: Policy Options for Governments. An Input Paper for the IUCN Technical Study Group on Biodiversity Offsets. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Http://portals.iucn.org/library/node/44776 [accessed 25 September 2016].
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Oryx
  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 28
Total number of PDF views: 163 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 430 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 9th November 2016 - 25th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.