Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Density of threatened ocelot Leopardus pardalis in the Sierra Abra-Tanchipa Biosphere Reserve, San Luis Potosí, Mexico

Abstract
Abstract

There is little information on the population status of the ocelot Leopardus pardalis in Mexico. In the Sierra Abra-Tanchipa Biosphere Reserve, in San Luis Potosí, ocelots are affected by habitat loss and fragmentation as a result of increased agricultural development. We used photographic identification in camera-trapping capture–recapture surveys to determine population abundance and density during the dry season and subsequent early and late humid seasons during April 2011–March 2012. We recorded 80 photographs of 15 individuals (10 males, one female, and four of undetermined sex) in 7,786 camera-days. Abundance was estimated using a closed capture heterogeneity model, yielding an estimated population of 9 ± SE 3 in the dry season and 21 ± SE 8 and 15 ± SE 5 during the subsequent early and late humid seasons, respectively. Spatially explicit density estimates were 0.04 and 0.03–0.18 individuals per km2 for the dry and humid seasons, respectively, and were similar (P > 0.612) among seasons. Peaks in ocelot activity occurred during 20.00–04.00. We conclude that the ocelots of the Sierra Abra-Tanchipa Reserve have a low population density and may face geographical and biological isolation as a result of habitat conversion. Continued monitoring and improved understanding of the movements and habitat preferences of ocelots are necessary to ensure their continued persistence, and connectivity between this population and others in north-east Mexico.

Copyright
Corresponding author
(Corresponding author) E-mail octaviocrr@colpos.mx
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

D.L. Borchers & M.G. Efford (2008) Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture–recapture studies. Biometrics, 64, 377385.

K.P. Burnham & D.R. Anderson (1998) Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.

L. Chapa-Vargas & K. Monzalvo-Santos (2012) Natural protected areas of San Luis Potosí, Mexico: ecological representativeness, risks, and conservation implications across scales. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26, 16251641.

A. Dillon & M.J. Kelly (2007) Ocelot Leopardus pardalis in Belize: the impact of trap spacing and distance moved on density estimates. Oryx, 41, 469477.

M.G. Efford , B. Warburton , C. Coleman & R.J. Barker (2005) A field test of two methods of density estimation. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 33, 731738.

B. Efron & R.J. Tibshirani (1993) An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York, USA.

R.J. Foster & B.J. Harmsen (2012) A critique of density estimation from camera-trap data. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 76, 224236.

F.V. Goulart , M.E. Graipel , M.A. Tortato , I.R. Ghizoni Jr, L.G. Oliveira-Santos & N.C. Cáceres (2009) Ecology of the ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) in the Atlantic Forest of Southern Brazil. Neotropical Biology and Conservation, 4, 137143.

T.N.E. Gray & S. Prum 2012. Leopard density in post-conflict landscape, Cambodia: evidence from spatially explicit capture–recapture. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 76, 163169.

A.M. Haines , J.E. Janečka , M.E. Tewes , L.I. Grassman Jr & P. Morton (2006) The importance of private lands for ocelot Leopardus pardalis conservation in the United States. Oryx, 40, 9094.

P.M. Harveson , M.E. Tewes , G.L. Anderson & L.L. Laack (2004) Habitat use by ocelots in south Texas: implications for restoration. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 32, 948954.

K.U. Karanth (1995) Estimating tiger (Panthera tigris) populations from camera-trap data using capture–recapture models. Biological Conservation, 71, 333338.

K.U. Karanth & J.D. Nichols (1998) Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology, 79, 28522862.

J.M. Kolowski & A. Alonso (2010) Density and activity patterns of ocelots (Leopardus pardalis) in northern Peru and the impact of oil exploration activities. Biological Conservation, 143, 917925.

S.C. Silver , L.E.T. Ostro , L.K. March , L. Maffei , A.J. Noss , M.J. Kelly (2004) The use of camera traps for estimating jaguar (Panthera onca) abundance and density using capture/recapture analysis. Oryx, 38, 148154.

M. Trolle & M. Kéry (2003) Estimation of ocelot density in the Pantanal using capture–recapture analysis of camera-trapping data. Journal of Mammalogy, 84, 607614.

M. Trolle & M. Kéry (2005) Camera-trap study of ocelot and other secretive mammals in the northern Pantanal. Mammalia, 69, 405412.

J.A. Villordo-Galván , O.C. Rosas-Rosas , F. Clemente-Sánchez , J.F. Martínez-Montoya , L.A. Tarango-Arámbula , G. Mendoza-Martínez (2010) Present status of the jaguar (Panthera onca) in San Luis Potosí, Mexico. The Southwestern Naturalist, 55, 394402.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Oryx
  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 35 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 219 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 27th March 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.