Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

Disentangling the links between conservation and poverty reduction in practice

  • Matt Walpole (a1) and Lizzie Wilder (a1)
Abstract

Biodiversity conservation is increasingly expected to reduce poverty where the two coincide. Yet conservation and poverty are multifaceted concepts and the linkages between them are complex and variable; whether and how conservation contributes to poverty reduction in practice will depend on the specific nature of those linkages. To unravel this complexity we explored the portfolio of Fauna & Flora International, an international conservation organization operating in some of the poorest countries and regions. We examined reports from 88 projects and categorized the rationales, approaches and outcomes of a sample of 34 livelihoods-focused projects. Rationales varied among and within projects and included apparent ‘win-win’ scenarios (reducing poverty improves conservation outcomes), trade-offs (conservation action hurts the poor or poverty reduction damages biodiversity), and situations where livelihoods interventions were not directly linked to conservation gains. Projects revealed a balance of direct (income, food security, health) and indirect (capacity building, reduced vulnerability, governance, empowerment) livelihood goals. Overall, empowerment, security and social network development were more significant short-term outcomes than income generation. Social responsibility was widely embedded but does not necessarily translate into a positive impact on poverty. Conservation organizations have the potential to improve the lives of the poor in many places where they operate, and arguably a duty to ensure that conservation does not make poor people worse off. Yet it is important to be clear about the reasons for engaging and the scope and scale of likely outcomes.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Disentangling the links between conservation and poverty reduction in practice
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Disentangling the links between conservation and poverty reduction in practice
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Disentangling the links between conservation and poverty reduction in practice
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Fauna & Flora International, Jupiter House, Station Road, Cambridge, CB1 2JD, UK. E-mail matt.walpole@unep-wcmc.org
References
Hide All
Adams, W.M. (2007) Thinking like a Human: social science and the two cultures problem. Oryx, 41, 275276.
Adams, W.M., Aveling, R., Brockington, D., Dickson, B., Elliott, J., Hutton, J. et al. (2004) Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty. Science, 306, 11461149.
Agrawal, A. & Redford, K. (2006) Poverty, Development and Biodiversity Conservation. Shooting in the Dark? WCS Working Paper No. 26, Wildlife Conservation Society, New York, USA.
Ash, N. & Jenkins, M. (2007) Biodiversity and Poverty Reduction: The Importance of Ecosystem Services. UNEP-World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK.
Brockington, D. & Schmidt-Soltau, K. (2004) The social and environmental impacts of wilderness and development. Oryx, 38, 140142.
Chapin, M. (2004) A challenge to conservationists. World Watch, November/December 2004, 1731.
Dasgupta, P. (2004) Human Wellbeing and the Natural Environment. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
de Sherbinin, A. (2008) Is poverty more acute near parks? An assessment of infant mortality rates around protected areas in developing countries. Oryx, 42, 2635.
DFID (2000) Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets. Department for International Development, London, UK.
FFI (2006) The Case for Integrating Conservation and Human Needs. Livelihoods and Conservation in Partnership Series No. 1. Fauna & Flora International, Cambridge, UK.
FFI (2008a) Fauna & Flora International. Http://www.fauna-flora.org [accessed 2 July 2008].
FFI (2008b) The Role of Enterprise Development in Conservation. Livelihoods and Conservation in Partnership Series No. 5. Fauna & Flora International, Cambridge, UK.
Gorenflo, L.J. & Brandon, K. (2006) Key human dimensions of gaps in global biodiversity conservation. Bioscience, 56, 723731.
Hulme, D. & Shepherd, A. (2003) Conceptualising chronic poverty. World Development, 31, 399402.
Kaimowitz, D. & Sheil, D. (2007) Conserving what and for whom? Why conservation should help meet basic needs in the tropics. Biotropica, 39, 567574.
Kiss, A. (2004) Is community-based ecotourism a good use of biodiversity conservation funds? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19, 232237.
Lockwood, M., Worboys, G. & Kothari, A. (2006) Managing Protected Areas: A Global Guide. Earthscan, London, UK.
Mapendembe, A., Thomas, D. & Dickson, B. (2008) Conservation & Poverty: A Review of Existing Commitments. FFI and BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.
Nadkarni, M.V. (2000) Poverty, environment, development – a many-patterned nexus. Economic and Political Weekly, 35, 11841190.
OECD (2001) The DAC Guidelines: Poverty Reduction. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France.
Redford, K.H., Levy, M.A., Sanderson, E.W. & de Sherbinin, A. (2008) What is the role for conservation organizations in poverty alleviation in the world's wild places? Oryx, 42, 516528.
Robinson, J.G. (2006) Conservation biology and real world conservation. Conservation Biology, 20, 658669.
Roe, D. (2008) The origins and evolution of the conservation-poverty debate: a review of key literature, events and policy processes. Oryx, 42, 491503.
Roe, D. & Elliott, J. (2004) Poverty reduction and biodiversity conservation: rebuilding the bridges. Oryx, 38, 137139.
Roe, D. & Elliott, J. (2005) Poverty-Conservation Linkages: A Conceptual Framework. Poverty & Conservation Learning Group, International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK.
Roe, D. & Elliott, J. (2006) Pro-poor conservation: the elusive win-win for conservation and poverty reduction? Policy Matters, 14, 5363.
Roe, D. & Walpole, M.J. (in press) Whose value counts? Trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and poverty reduction. In Trade-offs in Conservation: Deciding What to Save (eds Leader-Williams, N., Adams, W.M. & Smith, R.). Blackwells, Oxford, UK.
Salafsky, N. & Margoluis, R. (1999) Threat reduction assessment: a practical and cost-effective approach to evaluating conservation and development projects. Conservation Biology, 13, 830841.
Sanderson, S. & Redford, K. (2003) Contested relationships between biodiversity conservation and poverty alleviation. Oryx, 37, 12.
Sanderson, S. & Redford, K. (2004) The defence of conservation is not an attack on the poor. Oryx, 38, 146147.
Shackleton, C.M., Shackleton, S.E., Buiten, E. & Bird, N. (2007) The importance of dry woodlands and forests in rural livelihoods and poverty alleviation in South Africa. Forest Policy and Economics, 9, 558577.
Sunderlin, W.D., Angelsen, A., Belcher, B., Burgers, P., Nasi, R., Santoso, L. & Wunder, S. (2005) Livelihoods, forests, and conservation in developing countries: an overview. World Development, 33, 13831402.
Swiderska, K., Roe, D., Maganga, F. & Wilder, L. (2003) Voices from the South: The Role of Civil Society in Linking Biodiversity Conservation and Poverty Reduction. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK.
Terborgh, J. (2004) Reflections of a scientist on the World Parks Congress. Conservation Biology, 18, 619620.
Upton, C., Ladle, R., Hulme, D., Jiang, T., Brockington, D. & Adams, W.M. (2008) Are poverty and protected area establishment linked at a national scale? Oryx, 42, 1925.
Walpole, M.J. (2006) Partnerships for conservation and poverty reduction. Oryx, 40, 245246.
Walpole, M.J. & Thouless, C.R. (2005) Increasing the value of wildlife through non-consumptive use. In People and Wildlife: Conflict or Coexistence? (eds Woodroffe, R., Thirgood, S. & Rabinowitz, A.), pp. 122139. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Walpole, M.J., Wilder, L., Granziera, A., Thomas, D. & Elliott, J. (2007) Measuring the Impact of Livelihoods Initiatives in the Conservation Context. Fauna & Flora International/BirdLife International/African Wildlife Foundation, Cambridge, UK.
Wilder, L. & Walpole, M.J. (2008) Measuring social impacts in conservation: experience of using the Most Significant Change method. Oryx, 42, 529538.
World Bank (2008) World Development Indicators. The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.
Wunder, S. (2001) Poverty alleviation and tropical forests – what scope for synergies? World Development, 29, 18171833.
WWF (2006) Species and People: Linked Futures. WWF International, Gland, Switzerland.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Oryx
  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Walpole and Wilder supplementary material
Appendix.pdf

 PDF (49 KB)
49 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed