Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Avoiding impacts on biodiversity through strengthening the first stage of the mitigation hierarchy

  • Ben Phalan (a1), Genevieve Hayes (a2), Sharon Brooks (a3), David Marsh (a4), Pippa Howard (a4), Brendan Costelloe (a5), Bhaskar Vira (a6), Aida Kowalska (a2) and Samir Whitaker (a2)...
Abstract
Abstract

The mitigation hierarchy is a decision-making framework designed to address impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services through first seeking to avoid impacts wherever possible, then minimizing or restoring impacts, and finally by offsetting any unavoidable impacts. Avoiding impacts is seen by many as the most certain and effective way of managing harm to biodiversity, and its position as the first stage of the mitigation hierarchy indicates that it should be prioritized ahead of other stages. However, despite an abundance of legislative and voluntary requirements, there is often a failure to avoid impacts. We discuss reasons for this failure and outline some possible solutions. We highlight the key roles that can be played by conservation organizations in cultivating political will, holding decision makers accountable to the law, improving the processes of impact assessment and avoidance, building capacity, and providing technical knowledge. A renewed focus on impact avoidance as the foundation of the mitigation hierarchy could help to limit the impacts on biodiversity of large-scale developments in energy, infrastructure, agriculture and other sectors.

Copyright
Corresponding author
(Corresponding author) E-mail benphalan@gmail.com
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

A. Balmford , R. Green & B. Phalan (2015) Land for food and land for nature? Daedalus, 144, 5775.

K. Baylis , J. Honey-Rosés , J. Börner , E. Corbera , D. Ezzine-de-Blas , P.J. Ferraro (2016) Mainstreaming impact evaluation in nature conservation. Conservation Letters, 9, 5864.

T. Bendor (2009) A dynamic analysis of the wetland mitigation process and its effects on no net loss policy. Landscape and Urban Planning, 89, 1727.

J. Bright , R. Langston , R. Bullman , R. Evans , S. Gardner & J. Pearce-Higgins (2008) Map of bird sensitivities to wind farms in Scotland: a tool to aid planning and conservation. Biological Conservation, 141, 23422356.

J.S. Brooks , K.A. Waylen & M.B. Mulder (2012) How national context, project design, and local community characteristics influence success in community-based conservation projects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 2126521270.

S. Clare , N. Krogman , L. Foote & N. Lemphers (2011) Where is the avoidance in the implementation of wetland law and policy? Wetlands Ecology and Management, 19, 165182.

C. Dawkins & J.W. Fraas (2011) Coming clean: the impact of environmental performance and visibility on corporate climate change disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 303322.

E. Dinerstein , A. Baccini , M. Anderson , G. Fiske , E. Wikramanayake , D. McLaughlin (2015) Guiding agricultural expansion to spare tropical forests. Conservation Letters, 8, 262271.

C. Downie (2016) Prolonged international environmental negotiations: the roles and strategies of non-state actors in the EU. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16, 739755.

D.P. Edwards , J.J. Gilroy , P. Woodcock , F.A. Edwards , T.H. Larsen , D.J.R. Andrews (2014) Land-sharing versus land-sparing logging: reconciling timber extraction with biodiversity conservation. Global Change Biology, 20, 183191.

J. Ferreira , L.E.O.C. Aragão , J. Barlow , P. Barreto , E. Berenguer , M. Bustamante (2014) Brazil's environmental leadership at risk. Science, 346, 706707.

T.A. Gardner , A. Von Hase , S. Brownlie , J.M.M. Ekstrom , J.D. Pilgrim , C.E. Savy (2013) Biodiversity offsets and the challenge of achieving no net loss. Conservation Biology, 27, 12541264.

K.J. Gaston (2010) Valuing common species. Science, 327, 154155.

H.K. Gibbs , J. Munger , J. L'Roe , P. Barreto , R. Pereira , M. Christie (2016) Did ranchers and slaughterhouses respond to zero-deforestation agreements in the Brazilian Amazon? Conservation Letters, 9, 3242.

C.D. Ives & S.A. Bekessy (2015) The ethics of offsetting nature. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 13, 568573.

F. Kleinschroth , J.R. Healey & S. Gourlet-Fleury (2016) Sparing forests in Central Africa: re-use old logging roads to avoid creating new ones. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14, 910.

L. Kramer (2009) The European Commission's Opinions under Article 6(4) of the Habitats Directive. Journal of Environmental Law, 21, 5985.

J.W. Malcom & Y.-W. Li (2015) Data contradict common perceptions about a controversial provision of the US Endangered Species Act. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, 1584415849.

M. Maron , P.K. Dunn , C.A. McAlpine & A. Apan (2010) Can offsets really compensate for habitat removal? The case of the endangered red-tailed black-cockatoo. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47, 348355.

C.S. Martin , M.J. Tolley , E. Farmer , C.J. Mcowen , J.L. Geffert , J.P.W. Scharlemann (2015) A global map to aid the identification and screening of critical habitat for marine industries. Marine Policy, 53, 4553.

M.B. Mascia , S. Pailler , R. Krithivasan , V. Roshchanka , D. Burns , M.J. Mlotha (2014) Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) in Africa, Asia, and Latin America and the Caribbean, 1900–2010. Biological Conservation, 169, 355361.

B.A. McKenney & J.M. Kiesecker (2010) Policy development for biodiversity offsets: a review of offset frameworks. Environmental Management, 45, 165176.

P. Meyfroidt , E.F. Lambin , K.-H. Erb & T.W. Hertel (2013) Globalization of land use: distant drivers of land change and geographic displacement of land use. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5, 438444.

P. Newton , A. Agrawal & L. Wollenberg (2013) Enhancing the sustainability of commodity supply chains in tropical forest and agricultural landscapes. Global Environmental Change, 23, 17611772.

K. Niedziałkowski , J. Paavola & B. Jędrzejewska (2013) Governance of biodiversity in Poland before and after the accession to the EU: the tale of two roads. Environmental Conservation, 40, 108118.

S.L. Pimm , C.N. Jenkins , R. Abell , T.M. Brooks , J.L. Gittleman , L.N. Joppa (2014) The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science, 344, 1246752.

J. Pope , A. Bond , A. Morrison-Saunders & F. Retief (2013) Advancing the theory and practice of impact assessment: setting the research agenda. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 41, 19.

F. Quétier , B. Regnery & H. Levrel (2014) No net loss of biodiversity or paper offsets? A critical review of the French no net loss policy. Environmental Science & Policy, 38, 120131.

H.J. Rainey , E.H.B. Pollard , G. Dutson , J.M.M. Ekstrom , S.R. Livingstone , H.J. Temple & J.D. Pilgrim (2015) A review of corporate goals of No Net Loss and Net Positive Impact on biodiversity. Oryx, 49, 232238.

K.G. Raiter , H.P. Possingham , S.M. Prober & R.J. Hobbs (2014) Under the radar: mitigating enigmatic ecological impacts. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29, 635644.

J.G. Robinson (2012) Common and conflicting interests in the engagements between conservation organizations and corporations. Conservation Biology, 26, 967977.

M.J.M. Senior , E. Brown , P. Villalpando & J.K. Hill (2015) Increasing the scientific evidence base in the ‘High Conservation Value’ (HCV) approach for biodiversity conservation in managed tropical landscapes. Conservation Letters, 8, 361367.

I. Stott , M. Soga , R. Inger & K.J. Gaston (2015) Land sparing is crucial for urban ecosystem services. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 13, 387393.

S. Sullivan & M. Hannis (2015) Nets and frames, losses and gains: value struggles in engagements with biodiversity offsetting policy in England. Ecosystem Services, 15, 162173.

O. Venter , H.P. Possingham , L. Hovani , S. Dewi , B. Griscom , G. Paoli (2013) Using systematic conservation planning to minimize REDD+ conflict with agriculture and logging in the tropics. Conservation Letters, 6, 116124.

A. Villarroya , A.C. Barros & J. Kiesecker (2014) Policy development for environmental licensing and biodiversity offsets in Latin America. PLoS ONE, 9(9), e107144.

S. Walker , A.L. Brower , R.T.T. Stephens & W.G. Lee (2009) Why bartering biodiversity fails. Conservation Letters, 2, 149157.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Oryx
  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 83
Total number of PDF views: 389 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 2066 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 11th January 2017 - 24th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.