Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Half-Earth or Whole Earth? Radical ideas for conservation, and their implications

  • Bram Büscher (a1), Robert Fletcher (a1), Dan Brockington (a2), Chris Sandbrook (a3), William M. Adams (a3), Lisa Campbell (a4), Catherine Corson (a5), Wolfram Dressler (a6), Rosaleen Duffy (a7), Noella Gray (a8), George Holmes (a9), Alice Kelly (a10), Elizabeth Lunstrum (a11), Maano Ramutsindela (a12) and Kartik Shanker (a13)...
Abstract
Abstract

We question whether the increasingly popular, radical idea of turning half the Earth into a network of protected areas is either feasible or just. We argue that this Half-Earth plan would have widespread negative consequences for human populations and would not meet its conservation objectives. It offers no agenda for managing biodiversity within a human half of Earth. We call instead for alternative radical action that is both more effective and more equitable, focused directly on the main drivers of biodiversity loss by shifting the global economy from its current foundation in growth while simultaneously redressing inequality.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Half-Earth or Whole Earth? Radical ideas for conservation, and their implications
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Half-Earth or Whole Earth? Radical ideas for conservation, and their implications
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Half-Earth or Whole Earth? Radical ideas for conservation, and their implications
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
(Corresponding author) E-mail bram.buscher@wur.nl
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Also at: Department of Geography, Environmental Management & Energy Studies, University of Johannesburg, South Africa

Also at: Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology, Stellenbosch University, South Africa

Also at: United Nations Environment Programme, World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

R. Fletcher (2012) Using the master's tools? Neoliberal conservation and the evasion of inequality. Development and Change, 43, 295317.

C.C. Hicks , A. Levine , A. Agrawal , X. Basurto , S.J. Breslow , C. Carothers (2016) Engage key social concepts for sustainability. Science, 352, 3840.

A. Martin , A. Akol & N. Gross-Camp (2015) Towards an explicit justice framing of the social impacts of conservation. Conservation and Society, 13, 166178.

R.F. Noss , A.P. Dobson , R. Baldwin , P. Beier , C.R. Davis , D.A. Dellasala (2012) Bolder thinking for conservation. Conservation Biology, 26, 14.

J.A. Oldekop , G. Holmes , W.E. Harris & K.L. Evans (2016) A global assessment of the social and conservation outcomes of protected areas. Conservation Biology, 30, 133141.

M.P. Wells & T.O. McShane (2004) Integrating protected area management with local needs and aspirations. Ambio, 33, 513519.

G. Wuerthner , E. Crist & T. Butler (eds) (2015) Protecting the Wild: Parks and Wilderness, The Foundation for Conservation. Island Press, London, UK.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Oryx
  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 72
Total number of PDF views: 368 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 2581 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 5th December 2016 - 25th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.