Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Mitigating carnivore–livestock conflict in Europe: lessons from Slovakia

  • Robin Rigg (a1), Slavomír Finďo (a2), Maria Wechselberger (a3), Martyn L. Gorman (a4), Claudio Sillero-Zubiri (a5) and David W. Macdonald (a5)...
Abstract
Abstract

Conflicts with human interests have reappeared following recovery of large carnivores in Europe. Public acceptance is higher than historically but there is a need to identify effective, acceptable techniques to facilitate coexistence. We present a case study of predation on livestock in Slovakia. Damage, mitigation measures and public opinion were assessed using compensation records, analysis of farm conditions, questionnaire surveys, semi-structured interviews, diet analysis and on-farm trials of livestock-guarding dogs. Economic damage was inconsequential on a national scale but high locally: c. 80% of reported losses occurred at 12% of sheep flocks. Grey wolves Canis lupus were held responsible for four to six times more damage than brown bears Ursus arctos, although livestock occurred in only 2 of 78 wolf faeces during spring–autumn, when sheep and cattle were most vulnerable. Losses to Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx were negligible. Compared to other sectors of society shepherds had the most negative attitudes, particularly towards wolves, despite compensation payments. Appropriate use of livestock-guarding dogs was associated with fewer losses: median loss at trial flocks with predation was 70% lower than at control flocks. We conclude that identifying vulnerable farms and targeting them for mitigation could reduce damage, although lack of motivation and awareness are obstacles. This study shows that damage levels need not be excessive despite high predator densities in human-dominated landscapes. Conflicts were unevenly distributed, with much of the variation explained by local conditions and husbandry practices, especially preventive measures. Livestock-guarding dogs are particularly appropriate where wolves are present in proximity to unfenced pastures.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Slovak Wildlife Society, P.O. Box 72, Liptovský Hrádok 033 01, Slovakia. E-mail info@slovakwildlife.org
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

U. Breitenmoser , C. Angst , J.-M. Landry , C. Breitenmoser-Würsten , J.D.C. Linnell & J.-M. Weber (2005) Non-lethal techniques for reducing depredation. In People and Wildlife: Conflict or Coexistence? (eds R. Woodroffe , S. Thirgood & A. Rabinowitz ), pp. 4971. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

P. Martin & P. Bateson (1993) Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

A. Treves & L. Naughton-Treves (2005) Evaluating lethal control in the management of human–wildlife conflict. In People and Wildlife: Conflict or Coexistence? (eds R. Woodroffe , S. Thirgood & A. Rabinowitz ), pp. 86106. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

R. Woodroffe , S. Thirgood & A. Rabinowitz (2005) People and Wildlife: Conflict or Coexistence? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Oryx
  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: