Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-4ws75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T04:06:05.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The fynbos and the frogs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2009

Mark Simmonds
Mark Simmonds
Affiliation:
Biological Sciences, Queen Mary College, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

The fynbos of the South African Cape is renowned for its high number of endemic plants and animals, many of which are under threat. Much effort and money are being spent to secure their future. Amphibians may be especially vulnerable due to land drainage, and amongst those facing this and other threats is the Cape clawed toad Xenopus gilli for which a conservation programme has been developed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Oryx , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , April 1985 , pp. 104 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna and Flora International 1985

References

Adamson, R.S. and Salter, T.M. 1950. Flora of the Cape Peninsula. Juta, Cape Town.Google Scholar
Anon. 1975. Red Data Book. Amphibians and Reptiles. IUCN, Morges.Google Scholar
Anon. 1984a. Oryx, 18, 3.Google Scholar
, Anon. 1984b. Oryx, 18, 108.Google Scholar
Bigalke, R.C. 1979. Aspects of vertebrate life in fynbos, South Africa. In Ecosystems of the World, 9, 81–95 (Ed. Specht, R.L.). Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Boucher, C. and Stirton, C.H. 1978. Port Jackson. In Plant Invaders Beautiful but Dangerous, pp. 60–63 (Ed. Stirton, C.H.). Department of Nature and Environmental Conservation of the Cape, Provincial Administration, Cape Town.Google Scholar
Goldblatt, P. 1978. An analysis of the flora of Southern Africa: its characteristics, relationships and origins. Ann. Mo. bot. Gdn. 65, 369–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, R. 1974. The Geography of the Flowering Plants. Longman, London.Google Scholar
Kobel, H.R., Du Pasquier, L. and Tinsley, R.C. 1981. Natural hybridisation and gene introgression between Xenopus gilli and Xenopus laevis laevis (Anura: Pipidae). J. Zool., Lond. 194, 317–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loveridge, J.P. 1980. The habitat requirements of Xenopus gilli in the Cape Point nature reserve. Progress report: 1 August to 29 February 1980. In Research Report Herpetology. Department of Nature and Environmental Conservation, Cape Town.Google Scholar
Neser, S. and Wells, M. J. 1978. Control of plant invaders. In Plant Invaders Beautiful but Dangerous, pp. 144–153 (Ed. Stirton, C.H.). Department of Nature and Environmental Conservation of the Cape, Provincial Administration, Cape Town.Google Scholar
Passmore, N. and Carruthers, V.C. 1979. South African Frogs. Witwatersrand University Press, Johannesberg.Google Scholar
Rose, W, 1962. The Reptiles and Amphibians of Southern Africa. Maskew Miller, Cape Town.Google Scholar
Shaughnessy, G.L., Millar, J.C.G. and Jacot Guillarmod, A.J. 1978. Where did plant invaders come from? In Plant Invaders Beautiful but Dangerous, pp. 144–153 (Ed. Stirton, C.H.). Department of Nature and Environmental Conservation of the Cape, Provincial Administration, Cape Town.Google Scholar
Simmonds, M.P. 1982. The amphibian invader. World Wildlife News. Winter 1982/83, 6–7.Google Scholar
Simmonds, M.P. (In prep.) Interactions between Xenopus in Southwestern Cape Province.Google Scholar
Stuckenberg, B.R. 1962. The distribution of the montane paleogenic elements in the South African fauna. Annls Cape prov. Mus. 2, 190–205.Google Scholar
Takhtajan, A. 1969. Flowering Plants, Origin and Dispersal. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Taylor, H.C. 1978. ‘Capensis’. In Biogeography and Ecology of Southern Africa (Ed. Werger, M.J.A.) W. Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar