Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Getting ready for REDD+ in Tanzania: a case study of progress and challenges

  • Neil D. Burgess (a1), Bruno Bahane (a2), Tim Clairs (a3), Finn Danielsen (a4), Søren Dalsgaard (a5), Mikkel Funder (a4), Niklas Hagelberg (a6), Paul Harrison (a7), Christognus Haule (a2), Kekilia Kabalimu (a2), Felician Kilahama (a2), Edward Kilawe (a5), Simon L. Lewis (a8), Jon C. Lovett (a9), Gertrude Lyatuu (a10), Andrew R. Marshall (a11), Charles Meshack (a12), Lera Miles (a13), Simon A.H. Milledge (a14), Pantaleo K.T. Munishi (a15), Evarist Nashanda (a2), Deo Shirima (a15), Ruth D. Swetnam (a16), Simon Willcock (a8), Andrew Williams (a7) and Eliakim Zahabu (a15)...

The proposed mechanism for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD+) offers significant potential for conserving forests to reduce negative impacts of climate change. Tanzania is one of nine pilot countries for the United Nations REDD Programme, receives significant funding from the Norwegian, Finnish and German governments and is a participant in the World Bank’s Forest Carbon Partnership Facility. In combination, these interventions aim to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, provide an income to rural communities and conserve biodiversity. The establishment of the UN-REDD Programme in Tanzania illustrates real-world challenges in a developing country. These include currently inadequate baseline forestry data sets (needed to calculate reference emission levels), inadequate government capacity and insufficient experience of implementing REDD+-type measures at operational levels. Additionally, for REDD+ to succeed, current users of forest resources must adopt new practices, including the equitable sharing of benefits that accrue from REDD+ implementation. These challenges are being addressed by combined donor support to implement a national forest inventory, remote sensing of forest cover, enhanced capacity for measuring, reporting and verification, and pilot projects to test REDD+ implementation linked to the existing Participatory Forest Management Programme. Our conclusion is that even in a country with considerable donor support, progressive forest policies, laws and regulations, an extensive network of managed forests and increasingly developed locally-based forest management approaches, implementing REDD+ presents many challenges. These are being met by coordinated, genuine partnerships between government, non-government and community-based agencies.

Corresponding author
*Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark, WWF-US, Washington, DC, USA, and UNEP–World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK. E-mail
Hide All
J.C. Lovett (2003) Tanzania Forest Law. In Environmental Law and Policy in Africa (eds B. Chaytor & K. Gray ), pp. 151180. Kluwer Law International, The Hague, The Netherlands.

K. Tabor , N.D. Burgess , B. Mbilinyi , J. Kashigali & M.K Steininger . (2010) Forest and woodland cover and change in coastal Tanzania and Kenya, 1990 to 2000. Journal of the East African Natural History Society, in press.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 18
Total number of PDF views: 139 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 775 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.