Skip to main content

Human livelihoods and protected areas in Gabon: a cross-sectional comparison of welfare and consumption patterns

  • Steffen Foerster (a1), David S. Wilkie (a1), Gilda A. Morelli (a1), Josefien Demmer (a2), Malcolm Starkey (a3), Paul Telfer (a4) and Matthew Steil (a5)...

Understanding the role that protected areas play in the livelihood security of local communities is essential to ensure that local people are not left shouldering the costs of what is a public good, and to help maintain robust local and national constituencies for biodiversity conservation. To provide baseline data for a longitudinal study on the effects of newly established national parks on human livelihoods in Gabon we conducted a cross-sectional study that compared livelihood indicators between communities that do, and do not, use natural resources within protected areas. We interviewed 2,035 households in 117 villages at four sites, recording income, consumption, education, health indicators and social capital, and village characteristics such as distance to markets, distance to park boundaries, and land cover within a 5-km radius. Our results indicated that closed rainforest coverage was greater around park than control villages and that this difference was associated with a greater reliance of park households on forest resources. However, we found no systematic differences in most livelihood measures between park and control households. Instead, the relationship between household livelihood measures and proximity to parks varied in idiosyncratic ways between sites, suggesting that determinants of human welfare are highly localized and cannot be generalized to larger spatial scales.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Human livelihoods and protected areas in Gabon: a cross-sectional comparison of welfare and consumption patterns
      Available formats
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Human livelihoods and protected areas in Gabon: a cross-sectional comparison of welfare and consumption patterns
      Available formats
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Human livelihoods and protected areas in Gabon: a cross-sectional comparison of welfare and consumption patterns
      Available formats
Corresponding author
Boston College, Office of the Provost and Dean of Faculties, Waul House, 270 Hammond Street, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 02467, USA. E-mail
Hide All
Andam, K.S., Ferraro, P.J., Sims, K.R.E., Healy, A. & Holland, M.B. (2010) Protected areas reduced poverty in Costa Rica and Thailand. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 107, 999610001.
Anderson, R.M. & May, R.M. (1979) Population biology of infectious diseases: part 1. Nature, 280, 361367.
Blaney, S., Beaudry, M. & Latham, M. (2009) Contribution of natural resources to nutritional status in a protected area of Gabon. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 30, 4962.
Brockington, D., Igoe, J. & Schmidt-Soltau, K. (2006) Conservation, human rights, and poverty reduction. Conservation Biology, 20, 250252.
Cernea, M.M. & Schmidt-Soltau, K. (2006) Poverty risks and national parks: policy issues in conservation and resettlement. World Development, 34, 18081830.
Crookes, D., Humphreys, D., Masroh, F., Tarchie, B. & Milner-Gulland, E.J. (2007) The role of hunting in village livelihoods in the Ashanti region, Ghana. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 10, 457469.
Deaton, A. (1997) The Analysis of Household Surveys: A Microeconometric Approach to Development Policy. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, USA.
Demmer, J. & Overman, H. (2001) Indigenous People Conserving the Rain Forest? The Effect of Wealth and Markets on the Economic Behaviour of Tawahka Amerindians in Honduras. Tropenbos International, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
de Sherbinin, A. (2008) Is poverty more acute near parks? An assessment of infant mortality rates around protected areas in developing countries. Oryx, 42, 2635.
Dudley, N., Mansourian, S., Stolton, S. & Suksuwan, S. (2008) Safety Net: Protected Areas and Poverty Reduction. WWF, Gland, Switzerland.
ESA (European Space Agency) (2008) Regional Africa GlobCover Land Cover. Version 2.2. European Space Agency GlobCover Project, led by MEDIAS-France. Http:// [accessed 10 April 2011].
Fa, J.E., Albrechtsen, L., Johnson, P.J. & Macdonald, D.W. (2009) Linkages between household wealth, bushmeat and other animal protein consumption are not invariant: evidence from Rio Muni, Equatorial Guinea. Animal Conservation, 12, 599610.
Fa, J.E., Juste, J., Burn, R.W. & Broad, G. (2002) Bushmeat consumption and preferences of two ethnic groups in Bioko Island, West Africa. Human Ecology, 30, 397416.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2005) Land Cover Classification System. Classification Concepts and User Manual. Software Version 2. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
Ferraro, P.J. (2002) The local costs of establishing protected areas in low-income nations: Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar. Ecological Economics, 43, 261275.
Ghimire, K.B. & Pimbert, M.P. (eds) (1997) Social Change and Conservation: Environmental Politics and Impacts of National Parks and Protected Areas. Earthscan, London, UK.
Hegde, R. & Enters, T. (2000) Forest products and household economy: a case study from Mudumalai Wildlife Sanctuary, Southern India. Environmental Conservation, 27, 250259.
James, W.P.T. & Schofield, E.C. (1990) Human Energy Requirements. A Manual for Planners and Nutritionists. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Lahm, S.A. (1993) Utilization of forest resources and local variation of wildlife populations in northeastern Gabon. In Tropical Forests, People and Food: Biocultural Interactions and Applications to Development (eds Hladik, C.M., Hladik, A., Linares, O.F., Pagezy, H., Semple, A. & Hadley, M.), pp. 213226. UNESCO, Paris, France.
Lindenfors, P., Nunn, C.L., Jones, K.E., Cunningham, A.A., Sechrest, W. & Gittleman, J.L. (2007) Parasite species richness in carnivores: effects of host body mass, latitude, geographical range and population density. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 16, 496509.
Ling, S. & Milner-Gulland, E.J. (2006) Assessment of the sustainability of bushmeat hunting based on dynamic bioeconomic models. Conservation Biology, 20, 12941299.
Loibooki, M., Hofer, H., Campbell, K.L.I. & East, M.L. (2002) Bushmeat hunting by communities adjacent to the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania: the importance of livestock ownership and alternative sources of protein and income. Environmental Conservation, 29, 391398.
McElwee, P.D. (2010) Resource use among rural agricultural households near protected areas in Vietnam: the social costs of conservation and implications for enforcement. Environmental Management, 45, 113131.
Mullan, K., Kontoleon, A., Swanson, T.M. & Zhang, S.Q. (2010) Evaluation of the impact of the natural forest protection program on rural household livelihoods. Environmental Management, 45, 513525.
Naughton-Treves, L., Holland, M.B. & Brandon, K. (2005) The role of protected areas in conserving biodiversity and sustaining local livelihoods. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 219252.
Nyahongo, J.W., Holmern, T., Kaltenborn, B.P. & Roskaft, E. (2009) Spatial and temporal variation in meat and fish consumption among people in the western Serengeti, Tanzania: the importance of migratory herbivores. Oryx, 43, 258266.
Ohl-Schacherer, J., Shepard, G.H., Kaplan, H., Peres, C.A., Levi, T. & Yu, D.W. (2007) The sustainability of subsistence hunting by Matsigenka native communities in Manu National Park, Peru. Conservation Biology, 21, 11741185.
Robinson, J.G. & Bennett, E.L. (2004) Having your wildlife and eating it too: an analysis of hunting sustainability across tropical ecosystems. Animal Conservation, 7, 397408.
Roe, D. (2008) The origins and evolution of the conservation-poverty debate: a review of key literature, events and policy processes. Oryx, 42, 491503.
Rowcliffe, J.M., de Merode, E. & Cowlishaw, G. (2004) Do wildlife laws work? Species protection and the application of a prey choice model to poaching decisions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B. Biological Sciences, 271, 26312636.
Sanderson, S.E. & Redford, K.H. (2003) Contested relationships between biodiversity conservation and poverty alleviation. Oryx, 37, 389390.
Scherl, L.M., Wilson, A., Wild, R., Blockhus, J., Franks, P., McNeely, J.A. & McShane, T.O. (2004) Can Protected Areas Contribute to Poverty Reduction? Opportunities and Limitations. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
Stolton, S. & Dudley, N. (2010) Vital Sites: The Contribution of Protected Areas to Human Health. WWF and Equilibrium, Gland, Switzerland.
Taylor, R. (2009) Community based natural resource management in Zimbabwe: the experience of CAMPFIRE. Biodiversity and Conservation, 18, 25632583.
The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1979) The Belmont Report. Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Publication No. (OS) 78–0013 & (OS) 78-0014, Washington, DC, USA.
Upton, C., Ladle, R., Hulme, D., Jiang, T., Brockington, D. & Adams, W.M. (2008) Are poverty and protected area establishment linked at a national scale? Oryx, 42, 1925.
van Vliet, N. & Nasi, R. (2008) Hunting for livelihood in north-east Gabon: patterns, evolution, and sustainability. Ecology and Society, 13, article number 33.
Wells, M. & McShane, T.O. (2004) Integrating protected area management with local needs and aspirations. Ambio, 33, 513519.
West, P., Igoe, J. & Brockington, D. (2006) Parks and peoples: the social impact of protected areas. Annual Review of Anthropology, 35, 251277.
Wilkie, D.S. & Carpenter, J.F. (1999) Bushmeat hunting in the Congo Basin: an assessment of impacts and options for mitigation. Biodiversity and Conservation, 8, 927955.
Wilkie, D.S., Morelli, G.A., Demmer, J., Starkey, M., Telfer, P. & Steil, M. (2006) Parks and people: assessing the human welfare effects of establishing protected areas for biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology, 20, 247249.
Wilkie, D.S., Starkey, M., Abernethy, K., Effa, E.N., Telfer, P. & Godoy, R. (2005) Role of prices and wealth in consumer demand for bushmeat in Gabon, central Africa. Conservation Biology, 19, 268274.
World Bank (2008) World Development Indicators. The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed