Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Identifying challenges to enforcement in protected areas: empirical insights from 15 Colombian parks

  • Christoph Nolte (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

Protected areas are intended to conserve biodiversity by restricting human activities within their boundaries. However, such restrictions are difficult to enforce fully in many tropical parks. Improving regulatory enforcement requires an understanding of prevailing challenges to detection and sanctioning activities. Drawing from empirical field research in 15 Colombian parks, I show that current enforcement efforts may be insufficient to deter most priority threats. For long-term infractions, such as agriculture, livestock grazing, and construction, sanctioning violators is challenging, whereas for furtive infractions, such as logging and hunting, it may be difficult to detect violators. Investment in staff, equipment and infrastructure may fail to increase enforcement capacity and yield positive conservation outcomes unless accompanied by resolution of land tenure, clarification of use rights, improved patrolling strategies and protection of park guards.

Copyright
References
Hide All
AkellaA.S. & CannonJ.B. (2004) Strengthening the Weakest Links: Strategies for Improving the Enforcement of Environmental Laws Globally. Conservation International, Washington, DC, USA.
AlbersH.J. & RobinsonE.J.Z. (2013) A review of the spatial economics of non-timber forest product extraction: implications for policy. Ecological Economics, 92, 8795.
BertzkyB., CorriganC., KemseyJ., KenneyS., RaviliousC., BesançonC. & BurgessN. (2012) Protected Planet Report 2012: Tracking Progress Towards Global Targets for Protected Areas. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, and UNEP–WCMC, Cambridge, UK.
BrunerA.G., GullisonR.E. & BalmfordA. (2004) Financial costs and shortfalls of managing and expanding protected-area systems in developing countries. BioScience, 54, 11191126.
BrunerA.G., GullisonR.E., RiceR.E. & da FonsecaG.A.B. (2001) Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science, 291, 125128.
CBD & UNEP (Convention on Biological Diversity & United Nations Environment Programme) (2010) Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Canada.
ChapeS., HarrisonJ., SpaldingM. & LysenkoI. (2005) Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 360, 443455.
ChhatreA. & AgrawalA. (2008) Forest commons and local enforcement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 105, 1328613291.
CialdiniR.B., DemaineL.J., SagarinB.J., BarrettD.W., RhoadsK. & WinterP.L. (2006) Managing social norms for persuasive impact. Social Influence, 1, 315.
CoadL., LeveringtonF., BurgessN.D., CuadrosI.C., GeldmannJ., MarthewsT.R. et al. (2013) Progress towards the CBD protected area management effectiveness targets. PARKS, 19.1, 1125.
DudleyN., BelokurovA., BorodinO., Higgins-ZogibL., HockingsM., LacerdaL. & StoltonS. (2004) How Effective are Protected Areas? A Preliminary Analysis of Forest Protected Areas by WWF—the Largest Ever Global Assessment of Protected Area Management Effectiveness. WWF, Gland, Switzerland.
FerraroP.J. & PriceM.K. (2013) Using nonpecuniary strategies to influence behavior: evidence from a large-scale field experiment. The Review of Economics and Statistics., 95, 6473.
GEF (Global Environment Facility) (2008) GEF Benefits Index (GBI) for Biodiversity: Initial and Revised July 2008. Global Environment Facility, Washington, DC, USA.
GEF (Global Environment Facility) (2009) GEF Focal Area: Biodiversity. Global Environment Facility, Washington, DC, USA.
GibsonC.C., WilliamsJ.T. & OstromE. (2005) Local enforcement and better forests. World Development, 33, 273284.
GroombridgeB. & JenkinsM.D. (2002) World Atlas of Biodiversity. University of California Press, Berkeley, USA.
HilbornR., ArceseP., BornerM., HandoJ., HopcraftG., LoibookiM. et al. (2006) Effective enforcement in a conservation area. Science, 314, 1266.
KasparekM., MackR., MayerC. & RihaK. (2010) Biodiversity in German Development Cooperation 2010. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH, Eschborn, Germany.
LeveringtonF., CostaK.L., CourrauJ., PaveseH., NolteC., MarrM. et al. (2010) Management Effectiveness Evaluation in Protected Areas—a Global Study. Second Edition 2010. University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
McCarthyD.P., DonaldP.F., ScharlemannJ.P.W., BuchananG.M., BalmfordA., GreenJ.M.H. et al. (2012) Financial costs of meeting global biodiversity conservation targets: current spending and unmet needs. Science, 338, 946949.
MillerD.C., AgrawalA. & RobertsJ.T. (2013) Biodiversity, governance, and the allocation of international aid for conservation. Conservation Letters, 6, 1220.
NolteC., AgrawalA. & BarretoP. (2013) Setting priorities to avoid deforestation in Amazon protected areas: are we choosing the right indicators? Environmental Research Letters, 8, 17.
OatesJ.F. (1999) Myth and Reality in the Rain Forest: How Conservation Strategies are Failing in West Africa. University of California Press, Berkeley, USA.
RobinsonE.J.Z., KumarA.M. & AlbersH.J. (2010) Protecting developing countries’ forests: enforcement in theory and practice. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 2, 2538.
SternM.J. (2008) Coercion, voluntary compliance and protest: the role of trust and legitimacy in combating local opposition to protected areas. Environmental Conservation, 35, 200210.
SutinenJ.G. (1987) Enforcement of the MFCMA: an economist's perspective. Marine Fisheries Review, 49, 3643.
TerborghJ.W. (2004) Requiem for Nature. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Oryx
  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 68 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 427 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.