Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T02:20:15.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Managing small populations in practice: black rhino Diceros bicornis michaeli in the Ngorongoro Crater, Tanzania

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2006

Anthony Mills
Affiliation:
Also at: Department of Soil Science, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X01, Matieland, 7602, South Africa Frankfurt Zoological Society, PO Box 14935 Arusha, Tanzania
Pete Morkel
Affiliation:
Frankfurt Zoological Society, PO Box 14935 Arusha, Tanzania
Amiyo Amiyo
Affiliation:
Ngorongoro Conservation Area Authority, P.O. Box 1, Ngorongoro, Tanzania
Victor Runyoro
Affiliation:
Ngorongoro Conservation Area Authority, P.O. Box 1, Ngorongoro, Tanzania
Markus Borner
Affiliation:
Frankfurt Zoological Society, PO Box 14935 Arusha, Tanzania
Simon Thirgood
Affiliation:
Current address: Macaulay Institute, Aberdeen, AB15 8QH, UK Frankfurt Zoological Society, PO Box 14935 Arusha, Tanzania
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Black rhino Diceros bicornis michaeli in Ngorongoro Crater, Tanzania were reduced by poaching from c. 110 animals in the mid 1960s to c. 20 by the mid 1970s. Despite little subsequent poaching the rhino population has not increased. This paper builds on a stakeholder workshop held in September 2003 to consider the problems facing these rhino and make recommendations for management. Research and monitoring is required as conservation decisions are, through necessity, being taken based on expert opinion. Genetic constraints may arise in the future given the small population size. We hypothesize, however, that the rhino population is currently limited by ecological factors including: neonatal predation by hyaena Crocuta crocuta, loss of calving refuges because of a reduction in Acacia xanthophloea, competition for browse with elephant Loxodonta africana and buffalo Syncerus caffer, tick-borne disease, and disturbance from tourism. These factors are exacerbated by an institutional philosophy of non-intervention. We suggest using adaptive inference to assess this hypothesis and to provide managers with appropriate information for rhino conservation.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© 2006 Fauna & Flora International