Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Multiple methods increase detection of large and medium-sized mammals: working with volunteers in south-eastern Oman

  • Marcelo Mazzolli (a1), Taiana Haag (a2), Beatriz G. Lippert (a2), Eduardo Eizirik (a2), Matthias L.A. Hammer (a3) and Khalid Al Hikmani (a4)...

Abstract

We compared the effectiveness of various methods for surveying medium and large wild mammals in southern Oman. Working with volunteers recruited by Biosphere Expeditions, wildlife professionals and local rangers, we used direct observation, camera traps, sign surveys (tracks and/or dung) and molecular scatology to study 66 sampling units of 2 × 2 km (grid cells) in an area of 32 × 36 km during a 4-week period in February–March 2011. Sixteen mammal species were recorded, and the largest numbers of species were recorded by sign surveys and camera traps (both n = 9); sign surveys, direct sightings and DNA scatology recorded species across the largest number of grid cells. For species with a sample size large enough for comparison (i.e. detected in ≥ 8 grid cells), DNA scatology proved most effective for detecting caracal Caracal caracal, signs for hyaena Hyaena hyaena, ibex Capra nubiana, porcupine Hystrix indica and hyrax Procavia capensis, and signs and direct sightings for mountain gazelle Gazella gazella. Clustering, in which records from multiple methods are either adjacent or overlapping, was highest (≥ 76%) for the wolf Canis lupus, porcupine, ibex and gazelle. Our results indicate the best methods to detect and record the distributions of individual species in the study area, and demonstrate the advantage of using multiple methods to reduce the risk of false absences or partial detections. Our findings also highlight the potential of clustering as a means of cross-checking results of observations that are skill-dependent, which is particularly useful when employing a large workforce.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Multiple methods increase detection of large and medium-sized mammals: working with volunteers in south-eastern Oman
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Multiple methods increase detection of large and medium-sized mammals: working with volunteers in south-eastern Oman
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Multiple methods increase detection of large and medium-sized mammals: working with volunteers in south-eastern Oman
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

(Corresponding author) E-mail marcelo@projeto-puma.org

References

Hide All
Al Hickmani, H., Zaabanoot, N. & Zaabanoot, A. (2015) Camera trapping of Arabian leopard in the Nejd region of Dhofar Mountains. Cat News, 62, 32.
Ausband, D.E., Rich, L.N., Glenn, E.M., Mitchell, M.S., Zager, P., Miller, D.A.W. et al. (2014) Monitoring gray wolf populations using multiple survey methods. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 78, 335346.
Balme, G.A., Hunter, L.T.B. & Slotow, R. (2009) Evaluating methods for counting cryptic carnivores. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 73, 433441.
Boulinier, T., Nichols, J.D., Sauer, J.R., Hines, J.E. & Pollock, K.H. (1998) Estimating species richness: the importance of heterogeneity in species detectability. Ecology, 79, 10181028.
Brightsmith, D.J., Stronza, A. & Holle, K. (2008) Ecotourism, conservation biology, and volunteer tourism: a mutually beneficial triumvirate. Biological Conservation, 141, 28322842.
Buesching, C.D., Newman, C. & Macdonald, D.W. (2014) How dear are deer volunteers: the efficiency of monitoring deer using teams of volunteers to conduct pellet group counts. Oryx, 48, 593601.
Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R. & Laake, J. (1980) Estimation of Density from Line Transect Sampling of Biological Populations. Wildlife Monographs 72. Wildlife Society, Louisville, USA.
Cohn, J.P. (2008) Citizen science: can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58, 192197.
Davison, A., Birks, J.D.S., Brookes, R.C., Braithwaite, T.C. & Messenger, J.E. (2002) On the origin of faeces: morphological versus molecular methods for surveying rare carnivores from their scats. Journal of Zoology, 257, 141143.
Gompper, M.E., Kays, R.W., Ray, J.C., Lapoint, S.D., Bogan, D.A. & Cryan, J.R. (2006) A comparison of noninvasive techniques to survey carnivore communities in northeastern North America. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 34, 11421151.
Guillera-Arroita, G., Lahoz-Monfort, J.J., MacKenzie, D.I., Wintle, B.A. & McCarthy, M.A. (2014) Ignoring imperfect detection in biological surveys is dangerous: a response to ‘Fitting and interpreting occupancy models’. PLoS ONE, 9(7), e99571.
Haag, T., Santos, A.S., De Angelo, C., Srbek-Araujo, A., Sana, D.A., Morato, R.G. et al. (2009) Development and testing of an optimized method for DNA-based identification of jaguar (Panthera onca) and puma (Puma concolor) faecal samples for use in ecological and genetic studies. Genetica, 136, 505512.
Haag, T., Santos, A.S., Sana, D.A., Morato, R.G., Cullen, L. Jr, Crawshaw, P.G. Jr et al. (2010) The effect of habitat fragmentation on the genetic structure of a top predator: loss of diversity and high differentiation among remnant populations of Atlantic Forest jaguars (Panthera onca). Molecular Ecology, 19, 49064921.
Hamfelt, A., Karlsson, M., Thierfelder, T. & Valkovsky, V. (2011) Beyond K-means: clusters identification for GIS. In Information Fusion and Geographic Information Systems (eds Popovich, V., Claramunt, C., Schrenk, M. & Korolenko, K.), pp. 93105. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, New York, USA.
Harrison, R.L. (2002) Evaluation of microscopic and macroscopic methods to identify felid hair. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 30, 412419.
Howe, R.W., Wolf, A.T. & Rinaldi, T. (1995) Monitoring birds in a regional landscape: lessons from the Nicolet National Forest Bird Survey. In Monitoring Bird Populations by Point Counts (eds Ralph, C.J., Sauer, J.R. & Droege, S.), pp. 8392. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-149. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, USA.
Hulik, T., Mazzolli, M. & Hammer, M. (2015) True White Wilderness: Tracking Lynx, Wolf and Bear in the Carpathian Mountains of Slovakia. Biosphere Expeditions report. London, UK.
IUCN (2015) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species v. 2015.2. Http://www.iucnredlist.org [accessed 28 July 2015].
Jacquez, G.M. (2008) Spatial cluster analysis. In The Handbook of Geographic Information Science (eds Wilson, J.P. & Fotheringham, S.), pp. 395416. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, USA.
Janecka, J.E., Jackson, R., Zhang, Y., Li, D., Munkhtsog, B., Buckley-Beason, V. & Murphy, W.J. (2008) Population monitoring of snow leopards using noninvasive genetics. Cat News, 48, 710.
Karanth, K.U. & Nichols, J.D. (1998) Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology, 79, 28522862.
Karanth, K.U., Nichols, J.D. & Kumar, N.S. (2004) Photographic sampling of elusive mammals in tropical forests. In Sampling Rare or Elusive Species (ed. Thompson, W.L.), pp. 229247. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.
Kelly, M.J., Betsch, J., Wultsch, C., Mesa, B. & Mills, L.S. (2012) Noninvasive sampling for carnivores. In Carnivore Ecology and Conservation: A Handbook of Techniques (eds Boitani, L. & Powell, R.A.), pp. 4769. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Khorozyan, I., Stanton, D., Mohammed, M., Al-Ra'il, W. & Pittet, M. (2014) Patterns of co-existence between humans and mammals in Yemen: some species thrive while others are nearly extinct. Biodiversity and Conservation, 23, 19952013.
Kindberg, J., Ericsson, G. & Swenson, J.E. (2009) Monitoring rare or elusive large mammals using effort-corrected voluntary observers. Biological Conservation, 142, 159165.
Lee, A., Mazzolli, M., Tatum-Hume, E., Kirby, C. & Hammer, M. (2010) Icons of the Amazon: Jaguars, Pumas, Parrots and Peccaries in Peru. Biosphere Expeditions report. London, UK.
MacKenzie, D.I. & Nichols, J.D. (2004) Occupancy as a surrogate for abundance estimation. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 27, 461467.
MacKenzie, D.I., Nichols, J.D., Lachman, G.B., Droege, S., Royle, J.A. & Langtimm, C.A. (2002) Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology, 83, 22482255.
Mallon, D. & Budd, K. (2011) Regional Red List Status of Carnivores in the Arabian Peninsula. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK. Https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/edocs/RL-53-001.pdf [accessed 28 July 2015].
Mazzolli, M. (2009) Arabian leopard, Panthera pardus nimr, status and habitat assessment in northwest Dhofar, Oman (Mammalia: Felidae). Zoology in the Middle East, 47, 312.
Mazzolli, M. & Hammer, L.A. (2013) Sampling and Analysis of Data for Large Terrestrial Mammals During Short-Term Volunteer Expeditions. Biosphere Expeditions, UK.
Mazzolli, M., Oliveira, V. & Hammer, M. (2013) Studying Jaguars, Pumas and their Prey in Brazil's Atlantic Rainforest: The Jaguar Corridor. Expedition report. Biosphere Expeditions, UK.
Mondol, S., Karanth, K.U., Kumar, N.S., Gopalaswamy, A.M., Andheria, A. & Ramakrishnan, U. (2009) Evaluation of non-invasive genetic sampling methods for estimating tiger population size. Biological Conservation, 142, 23502360.
Murray, A.T., Grubesic, T.H., Rey, S.J. & Anselin, L. (2012) Spatial data uncertainty and cluster detection. Proceedings of the 2012 GIScience Meeting. Columbus, USA.
Newman, C., Buesching, C.D. & Macdonald, D.W. (2003) Validating mammal monitoring methods and assessing the performance of volunteers in wildlife conservation—“Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodies?” Biological Conservation, 113, 189197.
Nichols, J.D., Bailey, L.L., O'Connell, A.F. Jr, Talancy, N.W., Campbell Grant, E.H., Gilbert, A.T. et al. (2008) Multi-scale occupancy estimation and modelling using multiple detection methods. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45, 13211329.
Nomani, S.Z., Carthy, R.R. & Oli, M.K. (2008) Comparison of methods for estimating abundance of gopher tortoises. Applied Herpetology, 5, 1331.
Otis, D.L., Burnham, K.P., White, G.C. & Anderson, D.R. (1978) Statistical Inference from Capture Data on Closed Animal Populations. Wildlife Monographs 62. Wildlife Society, Louisville, USA.
Otto, C.R.V. & Roloff, G.J. (2011) Using multiple methods to assess detection probabilities of forest-floor wildlife. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 75, 423431.
Perez, I., Geffen, E. & Mokady, O. (2006) Critically Endangered Arabian leopards Panthera pardus nimr in Israel: estimating population parameters using molecular scatology. Oryx, 40, 295301.
Sauer, J.R., Fallon, J.E. & Johnson, R. (2003) Use of North American Breeding Bird Survey data to estimate population change for bird conservation regions. Journal of Wildlife Management, 67, 372389.
Schmeller, D.S., Henry, P-Y., Julliard, R., Gruber, B., Clobert, J., Dziock, F. et al. (2009) Advantages of volunteer-based biodiversity monitoring in Europe. Conservation Biology, 23, 307316.
Shannon, G., Lewis, J.S. & Gerber, B.D. (2014) Recommended survey designs for occupancy modelling using motion-activated cameras: insights from empirical wildlife data. PeerJ, 2, e532.
Silveira, L., Jácomo, A.T.A. & Diniz-Filho, J.A.F. (2003) Camera trap, line transect census and track surveys: a comparative evaluation. Biological Conservation, 114, 351355.
Spalton, J.A. (2000) The Arabian leopard in Oman. Cat News, 32, 67.
Spalton, J.A. & Al Hikmani, H. (2014) The Arabian Leopards of Oman. Stacey International, London, UK.
Spalton, J.A., al Hikmani, H.M., Willis, D. & Said, A.S.B. (2006) Critically Endangered Arabian leopards Panthera pardus nimr persist in the Jabal Samhan Nature Reserve, Oman. Oryx, 40, 287294.
Vanstreels, R.E.T., Ramalho, F.P. & Adania, C.H. (2010) Microestrutura de pêlos-guarda de felídeos brasileiros: considerações para a identificação de espécies. Biota Neotropical, 10, 333337.
Vine, S.J., Crowther, M.S., Lapidge, S.J., Dickman, C.R., Mooney, N., Piggott, M.P. & English, A.W. (2009) Comparison of methods to detect rare and cryptic species: a case study using the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Wildlife Research, 36, 436446.
Zielinski, W.J. & Kucera, T.E. (1995) American Marten, Fisher, Lynx, and Wolverine: Survey Methods for their Detection. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-157. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, USA.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed