Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Participation of natural resource managers on editorial boards of conservation and applied natural resource journals

  • Sarah K. Carter (a1) and Andrew H. Fayram (a2)
Abstract

A gap between research and management exists in numerous natural resource fields. This can lead to management actions that are based on experience rather than evidence and may be less effective as a result. The gap may be partly attributable to research not being relevant, timely or accessible for managers. Editorial boards of peer-reviewed journals are responsible for determining the relevance of submitted manuscripts for a journal's readership. Limited representation of natural resource managers on editorial boards may make it more difficult for journals to identify the topics and findings of most relevance for management, thus contributing to the research–management gap. We quantified the representation of natural resource managers on the editorial boards of 79 conservation and applied natural resource journals. We found that 65% of editors were affiliated with universities, 13% with research institutions, 12% with government agencies and 3% with NGOs. On average, 9% of editors were affiliated with an agency or organization responsible for managing or regulating natural resources. The proportion of managers on editorial boards did not differ significantly between natural resource fields or with journal impact factor. Potential benefits of greater integration of managers into the research and publishing process include selection of research topics with greater relevance for management, clearer statements of the management implications of research studies, and more frequent publication of research evaluating the effectiveness of management interventions. Further study is needed to evaluate whether greater participation of managers in the editorial review process may contribute to achieving these benefits.

Copyright
Corresponding author
(Corresponding author) E-mail skcarter@usgs.gov
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Current address: U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, 2150 Centre Ave. Building C, Fort Collins, CO 80526-8118, USA

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0030605315001465

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Arlettaz, R., Schaub, M., Fournier, J., Reichlin, T.S., Sierro, A., Watson, J.E.M. & Braunisch, V. (2010) From publications to public actions: when conservation biologists bridge the gap between research and implementation. BioScience, 60, 835842.
Born, J., Boreux, V. & Lawes, M.J. (2009) Synthesis: Sharing ecological knowledge—the way forward. Biotropica, 41, 586588.
Campbell, C.A., Lefroy, E.C., Caddy-Retalic, S., Bax, N., Doherty, P.J., Douglas, M.M. et al. (2015) Designing environmental research for impact. Science of the Total Environment, 534, 413.
Caudron, A., Vigier, L. & Champigneulle, A. (2012) Developing collaborative research to improve effectiveness in biodiversity conservation practice. Journal of Applied Ecology, 49, 753757.
Cook, C.N., Carter, R.W., Fuller, R.A. & Hockings, M. (2012) Managers consider multiple lines of evidence important for biodiversity management decisions. Journal of Environmental Management, 113, 341346.
Cook, C.N., Hockings, M. & Carter, R.W. (2010) Conservation in the dark? The information used to support management decisions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8, 181186.
Cook, C.N., Mascia, M.B., Schwartz, M.W., Possingham, H.P. & Fuller, R.A. (2013) Achieving conservation science that bridges the knowledge–action boundary. Conservation Biology, 27, 669678.
Cvitanovic, C., Fulton, C.J., Wilson, S.K., van Kerkhoff, L., Cripps, I.L. & Muthiga, N. (2014) Utility of primary scientific literature to environmental managers: an international case study on coral-dominated marine protected areas. Ocean & Coastal Management, 102, 7278.
Dicks, L.V., Walsh, J.C. & Sutherland, W.J. (2014) Organising evidence for environmental management decisions: a ‘4S’ hierarchy. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29, 607613.
Fayram, A.H., Schenborn, D.A., Hennessy, J.M., Nate, N.A. & Schmalz, P.J. (2009) Exploring the conflict between broad scale and local inland fisheries management: the risks to agency credibility. Fisheries, 34, 232236.
Fazey, I., Fischer, J. & Lindenmayer, D.B. (2005) What do conservation biologists publish? Biological Conservation, 124, 6373.
Fuller, R.A., Lee, J.R. & Watson, J.E.M. (2014) Achieving open access to conservation science. Conservation Biology, 28, 15501557.
Gibbons, P., Zammit, C., Youngentob, K., Possingham, H.P., Lindenmayer, D.B., Bekessy, S. et al. (2008) Some practical suggestions for improving engagement between researchers and policy-makers in natural resource management. Ecological Management & Restoration, 9, 182186.
Gossa, C., Fisher, M. & Milner-Gulland, E.J. (2015) The research–implementation gap: how practitioners and researchers from developing countries perceive the role of peer-reviewed literature in conservation science. Oryx, 49, 8087.
Lindenmayer, D.B., MacGregor, C., Dexter, N., Fortescue, M. & Cochrane, P. (2013) Booderee National Park management: connecting science and management. Ecological Management & Restoration, 14, 210.
Matzek, V., Covino, J., Funk, J.L. & Saunders, M. (2014) Closing the knowing–doing gap in invasive plant management: accessibility and interdisciplinarity of scientific research. Conservation Letters, 7, 208215.
Meffe, G.K. (1998) Conservation Biology: into the Millennium. Conservation Biology, 12, 13.
Memmott, J., Cadotte, M., Hulme, P.E., Kerby, G., Milner-Gulland, E.J. & Whittingham, M.J. (2010) Putting applied ecology into practice. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47, 14.
Milner-Gulland, E.J., Fisher, M., Browne, S., Redford, K.H., Spencer, M. & Sutherland, W.J. (2010) Do we need to develop a more relevant conservation literature? Oryx, 44, 12.
NSF NCSES (National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics) (2013) Survey of Doctorate Recipients, 2013. Http://ncsesdata.nsf.gov/doctoratework/2013/ [accessed 22 June 2015].
Prendergast, J.R., Quinn, R.M. & Lawton, J.H. (1999) The gaps between theory and practice in selecting nature reserves. Conservation Biology, 13, 484492.
Pullin, A.S. & Knight, T.M. (2005) Assessing conservation management's evidence base: a survey of management-plan compilers in the United Kingdom and Australia. Conservation Biology, 19, 19891996.
Pullin, A.S., Knight, T.M., Stone, D.A. & Charman, K. (2004) Do conservation managers use scientific evidence to support their decision-making? Biological Conservation, 119, 245252.
Schindler, S., Curado, N., Nikolov, S.C., Kret, E., Cárcamo, B., Catsadorakis, G. et al. (2011) From research to implementation: nature conservation in the Eastern Rhodopes mountains (Greece and Bulgaria), European Green Belt. Journal for Nature Conservation, 19, 193201.
Scott-Lichter, D. & the Editorial Policy Committee, Council of Science Editors (2012) CSE's White Paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications, 2012 Update, 3rd revised edition. Council of Science Editors, Wheat Ridge, USA.
Seavy, N.E. & Howell, C.A. (2010) How can we improve information delivery to support conservation and restoration decisions? Biodiversity and Conservation, 19, 12611267.
Sullivan, P.J., Acheson, J.M., Angermeier, P.L., Faast, T., Flemma, J., Jones, C.M. et al. (2006) Defining and implementing best available science for fisheries and environmental science, policy, and management. Fisheries, 31, 460465.
Sunderland, T., Sunderland-Groves, J., Shanley, P. & Campbell, B. (2009) Bridging the gap: how can information access and exchange between conservation biologists and field practitioners be improved for better conservation outcomes? Biotropica, 41, 549554.
Sutherland, W.J., Pullin, A.S., Dolman, P.M. & Knight, T.M. (2004) The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19, 305308.
Thomson Reuters (2013) ISI Web of Knowledge, Journal Citation Reports 2013 database. Http://webofknowledge.com [accessed 8 January 2015].
Walsh, J.C., Wilson, K.A., Benshemesh, J. & Possingham, H.P. (2012) Unexpected outcomes of invasive predator control: the importance of evaluating conservation management actions. Animal Conservation, 15, 319328.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Oryx
  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Carter and Fayram supplementary material
Table S1 and Figure S1

 PDF (407 KB)
407 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed