Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Payments for ecosystem services in an African protected area: exploring issues of legitimacy, fairness, equity and effectiveness

  • Nicole D. Gross-Camp (a1), Adrian Martin (a1), Shawn McGuire (a1), Bereket Kebede (a1) and Joseph Munyarukaza (a1)...
Abstract
Abstract

We explore the potential for payments for ecosystem services (PES) to reconcile conservation and development goals, using a case study of an experimental PES intervention around the Nyungwe National Park in Rwanda. The scheme involves the purchase of biodiversity conservation services from local communities in four selected locations. Although a portion of the payment is awarded at the household level, it is the collective action of the community that determines the level of the payment. Contracts are negotiated annually and include performance indicators within each participating community. We examine the ability of PES to achieve conservation and development objectives, through three sub-questions: Is the PES scheme effective? Is it legitimate and fair? Is it equitable? Our findings indicate that the relationship between these evaluation criteria is complex, with both trade-offs and synergies. In this case study the effectiveness of PES is dependent on the equitable distribution of the payment, participants’ belief and acceptance of the service being paid for, institutional histories that aid in the establishment of legitimacy and fairness, and the complementary nature of PES to more conventional enforcement methods.

Copyright
Corresponding author
(Corresponding author) E-mail n.gross-camp@uea.ac.uk
References
Hide All
Adams W.M., Aveling R., Brockington D., Dickson B., Elliott J., Hutton J. et al. (2004) Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty. Science, 306, 11461149.
Agrawal A. (2001) Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World Development, 29, 16491672.
Balmford A. & Whitten T. (2003) Who should pay for tropical conservation, and how could the costs be met? Oryx, 37, 238250.
Bruner A.G., Gullison R.E., Rice R.E. & da Fonseca G.A.B. (2001) Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science, 291, 125128.
Bulte E., Lipper L., Stringer R. & Zilberman D. (2008) Payments for ecosystem services and poverty reduction: concepts, issues, and empirical perspectives. Environment and Development Economics, 13, 245254.
Cavendish W. (2000) Empirical regularities in the poverty–environment relationship of rural households: evidence from Zimbabwe. World Development, 28, 19792003.
Ferraro P.J. & Kiss A. (2002) Direct payments to conserve biodiversity. Science, 298, 17181719.
Ferraro P. & Simpson R.D. (2005) Cost-effective conservation when eco-entrepreneurs have market power. Environment and Development Economics, 10, 651663.
Fisher B. & Christopher T. (2007) Poverty and biodiversity: measuring the overlap of human poverty and the biodiversity hotspots. Ecological Economics, 62, 93101.
Fisher J. (2012) No pay, no care? The importance of payments in payments for ecosystem services. Oryx, 46, 4554.
Gaston K.J. (2000) Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature, 405, 220227.
Hall A. (2008) Better REDD than dead: paying the people for environmental services in Amazonia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 19251932.
Holland T.G., Peterson G.D. & Gonzalez A. (2009) A cross-national analysis of how economic inequality predicts biodiversity loss. Conservation Biology, 23, 13041313.
Kosoy N., Corbera E. & Brown K. (2008) Participation in payments for ecosystem services: case studies from the Lacandon rainforest, Mexico. Geoforum, 39, 20732083.
Kosoy N., Martinez-Tuna M., Muradian R. & Martinez-Alier J. (2007) Payments for environmental services in watersheds: insights from a comparative study of three cases in Central America. Ecological Economics, 61, 446455.
Martin A., Rutagarama E., Gray M., Asuma S., Bana M., Basabose A. & Mwine M. (2011) Linking development interventions to conservation: perspectives from partners in the International Gorilla Conservation Programme. Society and Natural Resources, 24, 626636.
Masozera M.K. (2002) Socio-economic impact analysis of the conservation of the Nyungwe Forest Reserve, Rwanda. MSc thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
Masozera M.K. & Alavalpati J.R.R. (2004) Forest dependency and its implications for protected areas management: a case study from the Nyungwe Forest Reserve, Rwanda. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 19, 18.
McAfee K. & Shapiro E.N. (2010) Payments for ecosystem services in Mexico: nature, neoliberalism, social movements, and the State. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100, 579599.
Mulindahabi F. & Ndikubwimana I. (2010) Monitoring Threats to Biodiversity in Nyungwe National Park, Rwanda. Ranger-based Monitoring Report Year 2010. Wildlife Conservation Society Rwanda and Rwandan Development Board Tourism & Conservation, Kigali, Rwanda.
Myers N. (1997) Environmental services of biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 93, 27642769.
Ostrom E. (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Petheram L. & Campbell B.M. (2010) Listening to locals on payments for environmental services. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 11391149.
Plumptre A.J., Masozera M., Fashing P.J., McNeilage A., Ewango C., Kaplin B.A. & Liengola I. (2002) Biodiversity Surveys of the Nyungwe Forest of Southwest Rwanda: Final Report. Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, USA.
Rodrigues A.S.L., Andelman S.J., Bakarr M.I., Boitani L., Brooks T.M., Cowling R.M. et al. (2004) Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature, 428, 640643.
Salafsky N. & Wollenberg E. (2000) Linking livelihoods and conservation: a conceptual framework and scale for assessing the integration of human needs and biodiversity. World Development, 28, 14211438.
Sommerville M., Jones J.P.G., Rahajaharison M. & Milner-Gulland E.J. (2010a) The role of fairness and benefit distribution in community-based payments for environmental services interventions: a case study from Menabe, Madagascar. Ecological Economics, 69, 12621271.
Sommerville M., Milner-Gulland E.J., Rahajaharison M. & Jones J.P.G. (2010b) Impact of a community-based payment for environmental services intervention on forest use in Menabe, Madagascar. Conservation Biology, 24, 14881498.
Stainback G.A. & Masozera M. (2010) Payment for ecosystem services and poverty reduction in Rwanda. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 12, 122139.
Vedder A., Hall J., Harcourt A., Monfort A. & Wilson R. (1992) Burundi and Rwanda. In The Conservation Atlas of Tropical Forests: Africa (eds Sayer J.A., Harcourt C.S. & Collins N.M.), pp. 102109. IUCN and Simon and Schuster, New York, USA.
Waas P. (1995) Kenya's Indigenous Forests: Status, Management and Conservation. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
Weber W. (1989) An Analysis of Value Conflicts and Convergence in the Management of Afromontane Forests in Rwanda. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA.
Wells M. (1992) Biodiversity conservation, affluence and poverty: mismatched costs and benefits and efforts to remedy them. Ambio, 21, 237243.
Wunder S. (2007) The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation. Conservation Biology, 21, 4858.
Wunder S. & Alban M. (2008) Decentralized payments for environmental services: the cases of Pimampiro and PROFAFOR in Ecuador. Ecological Economics, 65, 685698.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Oryx
  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary Materials

Gross-Camp Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material.pdf

 PDF (96 KB)
96 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 101 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 495 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.