Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The research–implementation gap: how practitioners and researchers from developing countries perceive the role of peer-reviewed literature in conservation science

  • Céline Gossa (a1), Martin Fisher (a2) and E. J. Milner-Gulland (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

Conservation research has a poor record of translating science into action. Previous surveys have investigated the lack of information exchange between researchers and practitioners by focusing on the uptake of peer-reviewed literature by practitioners from developed countries. They largely ignore conservation practitioners and researchers from developing countries, for whom accessing scientific data may be more difficult. This survey investigates how practitioners and researchers from developing countries access the scientific information needed in their work, and the place of peer-reviewed literature in this process. Our results suggest that practitioners access and use peer-reviewed literature; however, both practitioners and researchers mainly obtain information from open-access journals and do not base their choice on a journal's Impact Factor. Furthermore, researchers and practitioners in developing countries appear to be looking for more direct collaboration to ensure research is relevant to their needs, as well as more open-access journals and new ways to disseminate information.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The research–implementation gap: how practitioners and researchers from developing countries perceive the role of peer-reviewed literature in conservation science
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The research–implementation gap: how practitioners and researchers from developing countries perceive the role of peer-reviewed literature in conservation science
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The research–implementation gap: how practitioners and researchers from developing countries perceive the role of peer-reviewed literature in conservation science
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
Corresponding author
(Corresponding author) E-mail celinegossa@gmail.com
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J. Born , V. Boreux & M.J. Lawes (2009) Synthesis: sharing ecological knowledge—the way forward. Biotropica, 41, 586588.

C.N. Cook , M. Hockings & R.W. Carter (2010) Conservation in the dark? The information used to support management decisions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8, 181186.

J.A. Evans & J. Reimer (2009) Open access and global participation in science. Science, 323, 1025.

J.G. Ewen , L. Adams & R. Renwick (2013) New Zealand Species Recovery Groups and their role in evidence-based conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50, 281285.

D.J. Flaspohler , B.R. Bub & B.A. Kaplin (2000) Application of conservation biology research to management. Conservation Biology, 14, 18981902.

G. Fonseca & P.J. Benson (2003) Biodiversity conservation demands open access. PLoS Biology, 1(2), e46.

S.R. Harrop & D.J. Pritchard (2011) A hard instrument goes soft: the implications of the Convention on Biological Diversity's current trajectory. Global Environmental Change, 21, 474480.

T.M. Hayes (2006) Parks, people, and forest protection: an institutional assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas. World Development, 34, 20642075.

A.T. Knight , R.M. Cowling , M. Rouget , A. Balmford , A.T. Lombard & B.M. Campbell (2008) Knowing but not doing: selecting priority conservation areas and the research–implementation gap. Conservation Biology, 22, 610617.

D. Lach , P. List , B. Steel & B. Shindler (2003) Advocacy and credibility of ecological scientists in resource decisionmaking: a regional study. BioScience, 53, 170178.

P.A. Lawrence (2006) Men, women, and ghosts in science. PLoS Biology, 4(1), e19.

G.K. Meffe (2001) Crisis in a crisis discipline. Conservation Biology, 15, 303304.

R. Meneghini , R. Mugnaini & A.L. Packer (2006) International versus national oriented Brazilian scientific journals. A scientometric analysis based on SciELO and JCR-ISI databases. Scientometrics, 69, 529538.

E.J. Milner-Gulland , J. Barlow , M.W. Cadotte , P.E. Hulme , G. Kerby & M.J. Whittingham (2012) Ensuring applied ecology has impact. Journal of Applied Ecology, 49, 15.

S.J. Ormerod , N.D. Barlow , E.J.P. Marshall & G. Kerby (2002) The uptake of applied ecology. Journal of Applied Ecology, 39, 17.

C.L. Parr & S.L. Chown (2003) Burning issues for conservation: a critique of faunal fire research in Southern Africa. Austral Ecology, 28, 384395.

A.S. Pullin & T.M. Knight (2005) Assessing conservation management's evidence base: a survey of management-plan compilers in the United Kingdom and Australia. Conservation Biology, 19, 19891996.

A.S. Pullin , T.M. Knight , D.A. Stone & K. Charman (2004) Do conservation managers use scientific evidence to support their decision-making? Biological Conservation, 119, 245252.

A. Sáenz-Arroyo , C.M. Roberts , J. Torre , M. Cariño-Olvera & R.R. Enríquez-Andrade (2005) Rapidly shifting environmental baselines among fishers of the Gulf of California. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272, 19571962.

S. Schindler , N. Curado , S.C. Nikolov , E. Kret , B. Cárcamo , G. Catsadorakis (2011) From research to implementation: nature conservation in the Eastern Rhodopes mountains (Greece and Bulgaria), European Green Belt. Journal for Nature Conservation, 19, 193201.

P. Shanley & C. López (2009) Out of the loop: why research rarely reaches policy makers and the public and what can be done. Biotropica, 41, 535544.

T. Sunderland , J. Sunderland-Groves , P. Shanley & B. Campbell (2009) Bridging the gap: how can information access and exchange between conservation biologists and field practitioners be improved for better conservation outcomes? Biotropica, 41, 549554.

W.J. Sutherland , A.S. Pullin , P.M. Dolman & T.M. Knight (2004) The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19, 305308.

J.M. Turner (2006) Conservation science and forest service policy for roadless areas. Conservation Biology, 20, 713722.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Oryx
  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 11
Total number of PDF views: 259 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 818 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 27th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.