Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

The revised IUCN protected area management categories: the debate and ways forward

  • Nigel Dudley (a1), Jeffrey D. Parrish (a2), Kent H. Redford (a3) and Sue Stolton (a1)

The global protected area estate is the world’s largest ever planned land use. Protected areas are not monolithic and vary in their purpose, designation, management and outcomes. The IUCN protected area category system is a typology based on management objectives. It documents protected area types and is increasingly used in laws, policy and planning. As its role grows, the category system must be reactive to opinions and open to modifications. In response to requests from members IUCN undertook a 4-year consultation and recently published revised guidelines for the categories. These made subtle but important changes to the protected area definition, giving greater emphasis to nature conservation, protection over the long term and management effectiveness. It refined some categories and gave principles for application. Debates during revision were intense and highlighted many of the issues and challenges surrounding protected areas in the early 21st century. There was a consensus on many issues including the suitability of different governance models (such as indigenous and community conserved areas), sacred natural sites, moving the emphasis of Category IV from habitat manipulation towards species and habitat protection, and recognition of legally defined zones within a protected area as different categories. However, there was considerable disagreement about the definition of a protected area, the appropriateness of some categories with extensive human use, the possibility of linking category classification with biodiversity outcomes, and recognition of territories of indigenous peoples. We map these debates and propose actions to resolve these issues: a necessary step if the world’s protected area network is to be representative, secure and well managed.

Corresponding author
Equilibrium Research, 47 The Quays, Cumberland Road, Spike Island, Bristol, BS1 6UQ, UK. E-mail
Hide All

Also at: University of Queensland (Industry Fellow), Brisbane St Lucia, Queensland, Australia

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

T. Agardy , P. Bridgewater , M.A. Crosby , J. Day , P.K. Dayton , R. Kenchington . (2003) Dangerous targets: unresolved issues and ideological clashes around marine protected areas. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Systems, 13, 353367.

L. Boitani , R.M. Cowling , H.T. Dublin , G.M. Mace , J. Parrish , H.P. Possingham . (2008) Change the IUCN protected area categories to reflect biodiversity outcomes. PLoS Biology, 6, 436438.

S. Chape , J. Harrison , M. Spalding & I. Lysenko (2005) Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 360, 443455.

J. Day (2002) Zoning: lessons from the Great Barrier Marine Park. Ocean and Coastal Management, 45, 139156.

N. Dudley (ed.) (2008) Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.

P. Howard , T. Davenport & F. Kigenyi (2003) Planning conservation areas in Uganda’s National Forests. Oryx, 31, 253264.

H. Locke & P. Dearden (2005) Rethinking protected area categories and the new paradigm. Environmental Conservation, 32, 110.

A.J. Noss (1997) Challenges to nature conservation with community development in central African forests. Oryx, 31, 180188.

A. Phillips (2002) Management Guidelines for IUCN Category V Protected Areas: Protected Landscapes/Seascapes. Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 9. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK.

K.H. Redford & A. Maclean Stearman (1993) Forest dwelling native Amazonians and the conservation of biodiversity: interests in common or collision? Conservation Biology, 7, 248255.

R. Woodroffe & J.R. Ginsberg (1998) Edge effects and extinction of populations inside protected areas. Science, 280, 21262128.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 13
Total number of PDF views: 126 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 435 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.