Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:55:21.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The South African giraffe Giraffa camelopardalis giraffa: a conservation success story

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2018

Francois Deacon*
Affiliation:
Wildlife and Grassland Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, Free State, South Africa
Andy Tutchings
Affiliation:
IUCN Species Survival Commission, Giraffe and Okapi Specialist Group, London, UK
*
(Corresponding author) E-mail deaconf@ufs.ac.za
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Across Africa the majority of giraffe species and subspecies are in decline, whereas the South African giraffe Giraffa camelopardalis giraffa remains numerous and widespread throughout southern Africa. By 2013 the number of giraffes in South Africa's Kruger National Park had increased by c. 150% compared to 1979 estimates. An even greater increase occurred on many of the estimated 12,000 privately owned game ranches, indicating that private ownership can help to conserve this subspecies. The estimated total population size in South Africa is 21,053–26,919. The challenge now is to implement monitoring and surveillance of G. camelopardalis giraffa as a conservation priority and to introduce sustainable practices among private owners to increase numbers and genetic variation within in-country subspecies.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna & Flora International 2018 

The discussion around the classification of giraffe species and the separation of subspecies is ongoing (Fennessy et al., Reference Fennessy, Bidon, Reuss, Kumar, Elkan and Nilsson2016; Bercovitch et al., Reference Bercovitch, Berry, Dagg, Deacon, Doherty and Lee2017). The South African giraffe has been classified as G. camelopardalis giraffa, G. camelopardalis capensis and G. camelopardalis wardi. Here we refer to the subspecies as G. camelopardalis giraffa, adopting the widely accepted nomenclature and taxonomy that recognizes nine subspecies (Brown et al., Reference Brown, Brenneman, Koepfli, Pollinger, Milá and Georgiadis2007; Dagg, Reference Dagg2014). We examine the status of the South African giraffe in private and public reserves, and National Parks and Provincial Nature Reserves, and the factors that have contributed to an increase in the population of this subspecies.

The current range of the South African giraffe is shown in Fig. 1. Within South Africa the subspecies’ preferred natural habitat is predominantly the savannah/woodland areas of Limpopo Province, the lowveld areas of Mpumalanga Province, northern sections of North West Province, and the north-east of Northern Cape Province. The natural distribution of the subspecies also includes sections along both sides of the Mozambique/South Africa border north of Swaziland, the South Africa/Zimbabwe border and the South Africa/Botswana border along the Limpopo River (Deacon & Parker, Reference Deacon, Parker, Child, Roxburgh, Do Linh San, Raimondo and Davies Mostert2016). We consider the giraffes residing in the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park to be an extralimital species, given the lack of data on whether there has been interbreeding between the subspecies G. camelopardalis angolensis and G. camelopardalis giraffa (Kruger, Reference Kruger1994; Nico van der Walt, pers. comm.), and therefore this population was omitted from our estimates.

Fig. 1 Current and historical records of the South African giraffe Giraffa camelopardalis giraffa. Current numbers include private game farms, private nature reserves, Provincial Nature Reserves and National Parks, totalling 26,919–30,368 individuals.

In 1898 the Sabi Game Reserve, which later developed into Kruger National Park, was estimated to have a population of < 30 giraffes (Koedoe, Reference Koedoe1996). By 1938 the Park's giraffe population had increased to 200 individuals, reaching 3,300 by the late 1960s, and in 1979 the Park's population was estimated to comprise c. 5,000 individuals, with an estimated 8,000 within the whole country by the beginning of the 21st century (Fennessy, Reference Fennessy2009).

A drastic decline in wildlife across South Africa as a result of European colonization and intensive hunting (Selous, Reference Selous1908) prompted the establishment of National Parks and Reserves during 1926–1937 (National Agricultural Marketing Council, 2006; Carruthers, Reference Carruthers2008). As the idea that wildlife should be researched began to take hold in the middle of the 20th century (Kingdon, Reference Kingdon1988), as did the idea that wildlife ranching could provide as productive a livelihood as domestic animal ranching (Dasmann & Mossman, Reference Dasmann and Mossman1960; Carruthers, Reference Carruthers2008; Tutchings & Deacon, Reference Tutchings and Deacon2016). Since the 1960s wildlife numbers on commercial farms have continued to rise, as has their economic value (Smit, Reference Smit and Schutte2006; Carruthers, Reference Carruthers2008). In the early 1980s there were c. 250 privately owned giraffes in South Africa, but following their introduction into numerous private and provincial game reserves (reserves managed by governmental nature conservation authorities; Theron, Reference Theron2005) it is now estimated there are giraffes on most of South Africa's estimated 12,000 game farms and ranches (WRSA, 2014). Populations comprise 1–250 individuals, with a mean of 30 per property stocking giraffes (M. Child, unpubl. data).

To assess the number of G. camelopardalis giraffa occurring in South Africa, we collected data during 2014–2016 by liaising with the managers/owners of the various private reserves, official Provincial Nature Reserves and National Parks. A modified method based on the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria version 3.1 (IUCN, 2001) was used to calculate the Extent of Occurrence (EOO), defined as ‘the area contained within the shortest continuous imaginary boundary which can be drawn to encompass all the known, inferred or projected sites of present occurrence of a taxon, excluding cases of vagrancy’ (IUCN, 1994). Using the range map (Fig. 1) as a baseline, the EOO for each district was considered to be the proportion of land within the district boundaries that encompassed the natural habitat of G. camelopardalis giraffa. We used the counts provided by ranch owners/managers to estimate the number of giraffes on each farm within a district. Ranch and reserve owners who provided census numbers conduct annual game counts via helicopter, fixed-wing aircraft or repeatable drive counts as part of their sustainable game ranching practice, to stock the farm appropriately according to its carrying capacity (Deacon et al., Reference Deacon, Tutchings and Bercovitch2016, unpubl. data). We used the EOO to calculate the approximate number of giraffes on game ranches and farms in each district and within the natural habitat of the subspecies. Based on the EOO we estimated there are 9,642 South African giraffes occurring on privately owned game farms or ranches that are registered with the national wildlife ranching organization (Wildlife Ranching South Africa), and an additional 3,781 in Provincial Nature Reserves.

We made an alternative estimate of the number of privately owned giraffes by multiplying the number of registered farms by the mean number of giraffes per farm, as provided in the farmers’ responses (Table 1). The result (12,059) is higher than that estimated from the EOO. Combining these two alternatrive estimates with the numbers in South Africa's National Parks (Table 2) yields a current population estimate of 21,053–24,502 (based on the EOO) or 23,470–26,919 (based on farmers' responses) G. camelopardalis giraffa in South Africa, with approximately half the estimated population on privately owned land.

Table 1 Numbers of South African giraffes Giraffa camelopardalis giraffa as of 2016 on private farms and/or ranches in South Africa (modified from Deacon & Parker, Reference Deacon, Parker, Child, Roxburgh, Do Linh San, Raimondo and Davies Mostert2016), by province, with number of farms registered with Wildlife Ranching South Africa (WRSA), number of responses (% response rate) and mean number of giraffes per farm provided by owners, estimated total number of giraffes (extrapolated from the number of registered farms), Extent of Occurrence (EOO, see text for details of calculation), total number of giraffes on private farms based on the EOO within each province, and number of giraffes in governmental Provincial Nature Reserves.

Table 2 Numbers of G. camelopardalis giraffa in South African National Parks as of 2013 (Ferreira et al., Reference Ferreira, Gaylard, Greaver, Hayes, Cowell and Ellis2013).

Both the genetic purity and the genetic diversity of the South African giraffe are of concern. The unrestricted exchange of giraffes by non-state entities could result in the hybridization of the subspecies where extralimital G. camelopardalis angolensis are, or have been, exposed to populations of the endemic G. camelopardalis giraffa, such as in Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park. Therefore the monitoring of giraffe subpopulations and regulation of associated translocations is imperative to maintain the purity and genetic diversity of the giraffe subspecies.

Globally Giraffa camelopardalis is categorized as Vulnerable on the IUCN Red List (Muller et al., Reference Muller, Bercovitch, Brand, Brown, Brown and Bolger2016); however, with no immediate threats severe enough to cause a population decline in the foreseeable future, it has been recommended that the G. camelopardalis giraffa subspecies in South Africa remains categorized as Least Concern (Deacon & Parker, Reference Deacon, Parker, Child, Roxburgh, Do Linh San, Raimondo and Davies Mostert2016; Deacon et al., Reference Deacon, Tutchings and Bercovitch2016, unpubl. data). This recommendation was made in a detailed report by the IUCN Species Survival Commission Giraffe and Okapi Specialist Group (Muller et al., Reference Muller, Bercovitch, Brand, Brown, Brown and Bolger2016). The threats, or lack thereof, were discussed in detail by the Endangered Wildlife Trust and are compiled in their status report (Deacon & Parker, Reference Deacon, Parker, Child, Roxburgh, Do Linh San, Raimondo and Davies Mostert2016). The increase in private ownership of giraffes across South Africa and the economic interest in conserving a thriving, healthy and viable population, and by default a suitable environment for giraffes, have stimulated an increase in giraffe numbers. However, continued monitoring and surveillance of protocols and adherence to best practice are essential to retain a healthy subspecies population, especially as habitat loss and fragmentation, along with landscape changes, continue to reduce the number of suitable environments across the rest of the continent (Reid et al., Reference Reid, Thornton and Kruska2004).

Acknowledgements

We thank South African National Parks, Wildlife Ranching South Africa and all participating ranch owners for providing giraffe population data for this nationwide census, and similarly the Provincial Nature Reserve officials and the various offices of the Departments of Environmental Affairs and Tourism. We thank the National Research Foundation, the Eastern Free State Highlands Nature Club and the Natural Bridge Wildlife Ranch in Texas, USA, for their continued support, and Matthew Child at the Endangered Wildlife Trust for liaison with various stakeholders.

Author contributions

FD collected the study data and liaised with all managers/owners of private ranches and National Parks. FD and AT jointly wrote the article.

Biographical sketches

Francois Deacon is an animal habitat specialist. He quantifies habitat resources in relation to the needs of wildlife species in Africa. Andy Tutchings has been involved with giraffe and elephant conservation in Africa for 15 years and has a passion for conservation education programmes. Both authors are founding members of the IUCN Species Survival Commission's Giraffe and Okapi Specialist Group, currently collaborating on wildlife projects throughout southern Africa.

References

Bercovitch, F.B., Berry, P.S.M., Dagg, A., Deacon, F., Doherty, J.B., Lee, D.E et al. (2017) How many species of giraffe are there? Current Biology, 27, 136137.Google Scholar
Brown, D.M., Brenneman, R.A., Koepfli, K.-P., Pollinger, J.P., Milá, B., Georgiadis, N.J. et al. (2007) Extensive population genetic structure in the giraffe. BMC Biology, 5, 57.Google Scholar
Carruthers, J. (2008) Wilding the farm or farming the wild? The evolution of scientific game ranching in South Africa from the 1960s to the present. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa, 63, 160181.Google Scholar
Dagg, A.I. (2014) Giraffe: Biology, Behaviour and Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Dasmann, R.F. & Mossman, A.S. (1960) The economic value of Rhodesia game. Rhodesian Farmer, 15 April, p. 4.Google Scholar
Deacon, F. & Parker, D. (2016) A conservation assessment of Giraffa camelopardalis giraffa. In The Red List of Mammals of South Africa, Swaziland and Lesotho (eds Child, M.F., Roxburgh, L., Do Linh San, E., Raimondo, D. & Davies Mostert, H.T.), pp. 19. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, South Africa, and Endangered Wildlife Trust, Lethabong, South Africa.Google Scholar
Deacon, F., Tutchings, A. & Bercovitch, F. (2016) South African Giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis giraffa von Schreber 1784) Conservation Status Report. Unpublished data, IUCN Species Survival Commission Giraffe and Okapi Specialist Group subcommittee.Google Scholar
Fennessy, J. (2009) Home range and seasonal movements of Giraffa camelopardalis angolensis in the northern Namib Desert. African Journal of Ecology, 47, 318327.Google Scholar
Fennessy, J., Bidon, T., Reuss, F., Kumar, V., Elkan, P., Nilsson, M.A. et al. (2016) Multi-locus analyses reveal four giraffe species instead of one. Current Biology, 26, 25432549.Google Scholar
Ferreira, S., Gaylard, A., Greaver, C., Hayes, J., Cowell, C. & Ellis, G. (2013) Animal abundances in parks 2012/2013. Scientific Services, SANParks, Skukuza, South Africa.Google Scholar
IUCN (1994) 1994 Categories & Criteria (version 2.3). IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Http://www.iucnredlist.org/static/categories_criteria_2_3 [accessed 6 May 2015].Google Scholar
IUCN (2001) 2001 Categories & Criteria (version 3.1). IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Http://www.iucnredlist.org/static/categories_criteria_3_1 [accessed 6 May 2015].Google Scholar
Kingdon, J. (1988) East African Mammals: An Atlas of Evolution in Africa. Volume 3, Part D: Bovids, Part 4. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA.Google Scholar
Koedoe, , (1996) Giraffidae. Http://www.koedoe.co.za/index.php/koedoe/article/viewFile/810/916, p. 25. [accessed 6 May 2015].Google Scholar
Kruger, J.W. (1994) The feeding ecology and behaviour of re-introduced giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis) in the Kalahari Gemsbok National Park. Msc thesis. University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar
Lesson, R.P. (1842) Nouveau Tableau du Règne Animal: Mammiferes. A. Bertrand, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Lydekker, R. (1904) On the subspecies of Giraffa camelopardalis. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1, 202–227.Google Scholar
Muller, Z., Bercovitch, F., Brand, R., Brown, D., Brown, M., Bolger, D et al. (2016) IUCN Red List Assessment: Giraffa camelopardalis. Status report by the IUCN Species Survival Commission Giraffe and Okapi Specialist Group.Google Scholar
National Agricultural Marketing Council (2006) Report on the investigation to identify problems for sustainable growth and development in South African Wildlife Ranching. Report No. 2006-03. Http://www.namc.org.za [accessed 5 April 2016].Google Scholar
Reid, R.S., Thornton, P.K. & Kruska, R.L. (2004) Loss and fragmentation of habitat for pastoral people and wildlife in east Africa: concepts and issues. African Journal of Range & Forage Science, 21, 171181.Google Scholar
Selous, F.C. (1908) African Nature Notes and Reminiscences. MacMillan, London, UK.Google Scholar
Smit, G.N. (2006) Calculation of grazing capacity and browse capacity for game species. In Game Ranching in Central South Africa (ed. Schutte, F.), pp. 1828. Alberts Design and Marketing, Brandfort, South Africa.Google Scholar
Theron, M.E. (2005) Voedingsgedrag van kameelperde (Giraffa camelopardalis) in die sentrale Vrystaat. Msc thesis. University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.Google Scholar
Tutchings, A. & Deacon, F. (2016) Sustainable Ownership: A Southern Africa Conservation Model. Presented at the International Giraffid Conference hosted by the Chicago Zoological Society at Brookfield Zoo, Chicago, USA, during 9–12 May 2016.Google Scholar
WRSA (2014) Wildlife Ranching Southern Africa. Https://www.wrsa.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Developing-wildlife-tourism-2017.pdf [accessed 13 March 2018].Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Current and historical records of the South African giraffe Giraffa camelopardalis giraffa. Current numbers include private game farms, private nature reserves, Provincial Nature Reserves and National Parks, totalling 26,919–30,368 individuals.

Figure 1

Table 1 Numbers of South African giraffes Giraffa camelopardalis giraffa as of 2016 on private farms and/or ranches in South Africa (modified from Deacon & Parker, 2016), by province, with number of farms registered with Wildlife Ranching South Africa (WRSA), number of responses (% response rate) and mean number of giraffes per farm provided by owners, estimated total number of giraffes (extrapolated from the number of registered farms), Extent of Occurrence (EOO, see text for details of calculation), total number of giraffes on private farms based on the EOO within each province, and number of giraffes in governmental Provincial Nature Reserves.

Figure 2

Table 2 Numbers of G. camelopardalis giraffa in South African National Parks as of 2013 (Ferreira et al., 2013).