Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-m2b9p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-03T17:37:55.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use and conservation of Cracidae (Aves: Galliformes) in the Peruvian Amazon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2009

Alfredo J. Begazo  and
Richard E. Bodmer
Alfredo J. Begazo
Affiliation:
Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, 303 Newins-Ziegler Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Richard E. Bodmer
Affiliation:
Programs in Tropical Conservation, Department of Wildlife Ecology & Conservation and Center for Latin American Studies, University of Florida, 319 Grinter Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Four species of the avian family Cracidae were studied in the Pacaya-Samiria National Reserve in north-eastern Peru. These large-bodied birds are an important source of protein for local communities on the periphery of the reserve. An estimated 425 kg of Cracidae biomass were harvested over a 1-year period by three communities. Pipile cumanensis was the most frequently hunted bird, both in terms of individuals hunted and biomass extracted. Mitu tuberosa and Penelope jaquacu also made up a substantial amount of the biomass extracted, but were hunted less frequently. Densities of all species of Cracidae within 5 km of the villages were substantially lower than in the interior of the reserve. Our results suggest that M. tuberosa and P. cumanensis are overharvested and P. jaquacu and Ortalis guttata are harvested within the maximum estimated sustainable levels. In this study hunting grounds were along waterways and adjacent to protected populations, which created a source-sink arrangement. If sink areas are overhunted, the unhunted populations inland of the waterways could be acting as source populations that replenish overhunted areas.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Oryx , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , October 1998 , pp. 301 - 309
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna and Flora International 1998

References

Alcorn, J. 1993. Indigenous people and conservation. Conservation Biology, 7, 424–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, M., Magalhaes-Lima, D., De Sousa Martins, E. and Barreiros, J.L. 1991. On the tract of the road: changes in subsistence hunting in a Brazilian Amazonian village. In Neotropical Wildlife Use and Conservation (eds Robinson, J. G. and Redford, K. H.), pp. 82–92. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Begazo, A.J. 1996. Use de la poblaciones de paujiles, pucacungas, pavas de monte y manajaracos (Cracidae-Galliformes) en el noreste peruano. In Manejo de Fauna Silvestre en la Amazonia (eds Fang, T. G., Bodmer, R. E., Aquino, R. and Valqui, M.), pp. 257–266. Editorial Instituto de Ecologia, La Paz, Bolivia.Google Scholar
Bodmer, R.E. 1995. Managing Amazonian wildlife: biological correlates of game choice by detribalized hunters. Ecological Applications, 5, 872–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodmer, R.E., Reyes, C., Allen, C., Penn, J. and Aquino, R. In press. Evaluating the sustainable use of wildlife in the Pacaya-Samiria National Reserve, Peru. America Verde.Google Scholar
Buckland, S.T., Anderson, D., Burnham, K. and Laake, J. 1993. Distance Sampling. Estimating the Abundance of Biological Populations. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
Cole, L.C. 1954. The population consequences of life history phenomena. Quarterly Review of Biology, 29, 103–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collar, N.J., Gonzaga, L., Krabbe, N, Madroño Nieto, A., Naranjo, L., Parker, T. III. and Wege, D. 1992. Threatened Birds of the Americas. The ICBP/IUCN Red Data Book. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.Google Scholar
Delacour, J. and Amadon, D. 1973. Curassows and Related Allies. The American Museum of Natural History, New York.Google Scholar
Erard, C. and Sabatier, M. 1994. Fruit eating and ornithocory in the forests of Guyana: the example of large terrestrial birds and Marail guan. Alauda, 62 (1), 27–31.Google Scholar
Estudillo-Lopez, J. 1988. Breeding cracids in captivity. Proceedings of World Conference of Breeding of Endangered Species in Captivity, 5, 159–163.Google Scholar
IUCN Species Survival Commission, 1996. IUCN Red List Categories. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Laake, J.L. Buckland, S., Anderson, D. and Burnham, K. 1994. Distance user's guide V2.1. Colorado Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. Colorado State University, Fort Collins.Google Scholar
Levey, D. 1994. Cracids as seed dispersers: what we need to know and why this is important. The Cracid Newsletter, 3, 3–4.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, T.E. and Brash, A.R. 1984. Homage au Jean D'arc or the conservation of the Cracidae. Dodo Journal of Jersey Wildlife Preservation Trust, 21, 33–42.Google Scholar
McCullough, D.R. 1996. Spatially structured populations and harvest theory. Journal of Wildlife Management, 60, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novaro, A. 1995. Sustainable harvest of Culpeo fox in Patagonia. Oryx, 29, 18–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raez-Luna, E.F. 1995. Hunting large primates and conservation of the Neotropical rain forests. Oryx, 29, 43–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redford, K. and Stearman, A. 1993. Forest-dwelling native Amazonians and the conservation of biodiverstiy: interest in common or in collision? Conservation Biology, 7, 248–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. and Redford, K. 1991. Sustainable harvest of Neotropical forest mammals. In Neotropical Wildlife Use and Conservation (eds. Robinson, J. G. and Redford, K. H.), pp. 415–429. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Schifter, H. 1989. Early longevity and breeding records of curassows (Cracidae). Rivista Italiana di Ornitologia, 59, 70–74.Google Scholar
Silva, J. and Strahl, S. 1991. Human impact on populations of chachalacas, guans and curassows (Galliformes: Cracidade) in Venezuela. In Neotropical Wildlife Use and Conservation (eds Robinson, J. G. and Redford, K. H.), pp. 37–52. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Slade, N., Gomulkiewicz, R. and Alexander, H. 1998. Alternatives to Robinson and Redford's method of assessing overharvest from incomplete demographic data. Conservation Biology, 12, 148–155.Google Scholar
Strahl, S.D. and Grajal, A. 1991. Conservation of large avian frugivores and the management of Neotropical protected areas. Oryx, 25, 50–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terborgh, J. 1986. Keystone plant resources in the tropical forest. In Conservation Biology (eds Soule, M. E. and Wilcox, B. A.), pp. 330–344. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Texeira, D.M. and Snow, D.W. 1982. Notes on the nesting of the red-billed curassow Crax blumetnbachii. Bulletin of the British Ornithological Club, 102, 83–84.Google Scholar
Thiollay, J.M. 1989. Area requirements for the conservation of rain forest raptors and game birds in French Guiana. Conservation Biology, 3, 128–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar