Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Using information on ecosystem services in Nepal to inform biodiversity conservation and local to national decision-making

  • Ishana Thapa (a1), Stuart H. M. Butchart (a2), Hum Gurung (a1), Alison J. Stattersfield (a2), David H. L. Thomas (a2) and Jennifer C. Birch (a2)...

Policy-makers are paying increasing attention to ecosystem services, given improved understanding that they underpin human well-being, and following their integration within the Aichi Targets of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Decision-makers need information on trends in biodiversity and ecosystem services but tools for assessing the latter are often expensive, technically demanding and ignore the local context. In this study we used a simple, replicable participatory assessment approach to gather information on ecosystem services at important sites for biodiversity conservation in Nepal, to feed into local and national decision-making. Through engaging knowledgeable stakeholders we assessed the services delivered by Nepal's 27 Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas, the pressures affecting services through impacts on land cover and land use, and the consequences of these for people. We found that these sites provide ecosystem services to beneficiaries at a range of scales but under current pressures the balance of services will change, with local communities incurring the greatest costs. The approach provided valuable information on the trade-offs between ecosystem services and between different people, developed the capacity of civil society to engage in decision-making at the local and national level, and provided digestible information for Nepal's government. We recommend this approach in other countries where there is a lack of information on the likely impacts of land-use change on ecosystem services and people.

Corresponding author
(Corresponding author) E-mail
Hide All
* Current address: Himalayan Sustainable Future Foundation, Dhapashi, Kathmandu, Nepal
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

K.J. Bagstad , D.J. Semmens , S. Waage & R. Winthrop (2013) A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation. Ecosystem Services, 5, 2739.

B.P. Bhattarai & P. Kindlmann (2013) Effect of human disturbance on the prey of tiger in the Chitwan National Park—implications for park management. Journal of Environmental Management, 131, 343350.

J.C. Birch , I. Thapa , A.P. Balmford , R.B. Bradbury , C. Brown , S.H.M. Butchart (2014) What benefits do community forests provide, and to whom? A rapid assessment of ecosystem services from a Himalayan forest in Nepal. Ecosystem Services, 8, 118127.

M. Burgman , A. Carr , L. Godden , R. Gregory , M. McBride , L. Flander & L. Maguire (2011) Redefining expertise and improving ecological judgement. Conservation Letters, 4, 8187.

R. Costanza , R. Darge , R. Degroot , S. Farber , M. Grasso , B. Hannon (1997) The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253260.

T.C. Daniel , A. Muhar , A. Arnberger , O. Aznar , J.W. Boyd , K.M.A. Chan (2012) Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 88128819.

F. Danielsen , T. Adrian , S. Brofeldt , M. van Noordwijk , M. K. Poulsen , S. Rahayu (2013) Community monitoring for REDD+: international promises and field realities. Ecology and Society, 18, 41.

F. Danielsen , N.D. Burgess , P.M. Jensen & K. Pirhofer-Walzl (2010) Environmental monitoring: the scale and speed of implementation varies according to the degree of people's involvement. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47, 11661168.

P.F. Donald , R.E. Green & M.F. Heath (2001) Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe's bird populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 268, 2529.

F. Eigenbrod , P.R. Armsworth , B.J. Anderson , A. Heinemeyer , S. Gillings , D.B. Roy (2010) Error propagation associated with benefits transfer-based mapping of ecosystem services. Biological Conservation, 143, 24872493.

C. Feld , J. Sousa , P. da Silva & T. Dawson (2010) Indicators for biodiversity and ecosystem services: towards an improved framework for ecosystems assessment. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19, 28952919.

L. Hein , K. van Koppen , R. S. de Groot & E.C. van Ierland (2006) Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 57, 209228.

K.A. Kainer , M.L. DiGiano , A.E. Duchelle , L.H.O. Wadt , E. Bruna & J.L. Dain (2009) Partnering for greater success: local stakeholders and research in tropical biology and conservation. Biotropica, 41, 555562.

S. Kari & K. Korhonen-Kurki (2013) Framing local outcomes of biodiversity conservation through ecosystem services: a case study from Ranomafana, Madagascar. Ecosystem Services, 3, e32e39.

C. Layke , A. Mapendembe , C. Brown , M. Walpole & J. Winn (2012) Indicators from the global and sub-global millennium ecosystem assessments: an analysis and next steps. Ecological Indicators, 17, 7787.

K.S.-H. Peh , A.P. Balmford , R.B. Bradbury , C. Brown , S.H.M. Butchart , F.M.R. Hughes (2013) TESSA: a toolkit for rapid assessment of ecosystem services at sites of biodiversity conservation importance. Ecosystem Services, 5, e51e57.

M. S. Reed (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation, 141, 24172431.

R. Seppelt , C.F. Dormann , F.V. Eppink , S. Lautenbach & S. Schmidt (2011) A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48, 630636.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 26
Total number of PDF views: 176 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 318 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 30th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.