Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Using information on ecosystem services in Nepal to inform biodiversity conservation and local to national decision-making

  • Ishana Thapa (a1), Stuart H. M. Butchart (a2), Hum Gurung (a1), Alison J. Stattersfield (a2), David H. L. Thomas (a2) and Jennifer C. Birch (a2)...
Abstract
Abstract

Policy-makers are paying increasing attention to ecosystem services, given improved understanding that they underpin human well-being, and following their integration within the Aichi Targets of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Decision-makers need information on trends in biodiversity and ecosystem services but tools for assessing the latter are often expensive, technically demanding and ignore the local context. In this study we used a simple, replicable participatory assessment approach to gather information on ecosystem services at important sites for biodiversity conservation in Nepal, to feed into local and national decision-making. Through engaging knowledgeable stakeholders we assessed the services delivered by Nepal's 27 Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas, the pressures affecting services through impacts on land cover and land use, and the consequences of these for people. We found that these sites provide ecosystem services to beneficiaries at a range of scales but under current pressures the balance of services will change, with local communities incurring the greatest costs. The approach provided valuable information on the trade-offs between ecosystem services and between different people, developed the capacity of civil society to engage in decision-making at the local and national level, and provided digestible information for Nepal's government. We recommend this approach in other countries where there is a lack of information on the likely impacts of land-use change on ecosystem services and people.

Copyright
Corresponding author
(Corresponding author) E-mail jenny.birch@birdlife.org
Footnotes
Hide All
* Current address: Himalayan Sustainable Future Foundation, Dhapashi, Kathmandu, Nepal
Footnotes
References
Hide All
BagstadK.J., SemmensD.J., WaageS. & WinthropR. (2013) A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation. Ecosystem Services, 5, 2739.
BCN & DNPWC (2011) The State of Nepal's Birds 2010. Bird Conservation Nepal and Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal.
BCN & DNPWC (2012) Conserving Biodiversity and Delivering Ecosystem Services at Important Bird Areas in Nepal. Bird Conservation Nepal, Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal, and BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
BennunL. & FanshaweJ. (1997) Using forest birds to evaluate forest management: an East African perspective. In African Rainforests and the Conservation of Biodiversity (ed. Doolan S.), pp. 1022. Earthwatch Europe, Oxford, UK.
BennunL., FishpoolL.D.C. & LascellesB. (2013) Important Bird Areas on land and sea: a global inventory of key sites for conservation. In Tracking Key Trends in Biodiversity Science and Policy (eds Brooks A.L. & Aricò S.), pp. 6166. UNESCO, Paris, France.
BhattaraiB.P. & KindlmannP. (2013) Effect of human disturbance on the prey of tiger in the Chitwan National Park—implications for park management. Journal of Environmental Management, 131, 343350.
BibbyC.J., CollarN.J., CrosbyM.J., HeathM.F., ImbodenC., JohnsonT.H. et al. (1992) Putting Biodiversity on the Map. International Council for Bird Preservation, Cambridge, UK.
BirchJ.C., ThapaI., BalmfordA.P., BradburyR.B., BrownC., ButchartS.H.M. et al. (2014) What benefits do community forests provide, and to whom? A rapid assessment of ecosystem services from a Himalayan forest in Nepal. Ecosystem Services, 8, 118127.
BirdLife International (2006) Monitoring Important Bird Areas: A Global Framework. Version 1.2. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
BirdLife International (2011) Empowering the Grassroots—BirdLife, Participation, and Local Communities. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
BurgmanM., CarrA., GoddenL., GregoryR., McBrideM., FlanderL. & MaguireL. (2011) Redefining expertise and improving ecological judgement. Conservation Letters, 4, 8187.
CBD (2010) COP 10 Decision X/2. X/2.Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020. Https://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=12268 [accessed 16 December 2013].
CBD (2013) Country Profiles: Nepal—Overview. Http://www.cbd.int/countries/?country=np [accessed 7 June 2013].
CostanzaR., DargeR., DegrootR., FarberS., GrassoM., HannonB. et al. (1997) The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253260.
DanielT.C., MuharA., ArnbergerA., AznarO., BoydJ.W., ChanK.M.A. et al. (2012) Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 88128819.
DanielsenF., AdrianT., BrofeldtS., van NoordwijkM., PoulsenM. K., RahayuS. et al. (2013) Community monitoring for REDD+: international promises and field realities. Ecology and Society, 18, 41.
DanielsenF., BurgessN.D., JensenP.M. & Pirhofer-WalzlK. (2010) Environmental monitoring: the scale and speed of implementation varies according to the degree of people's involvement. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47, 11661168.
DNPWC (2012) Annual Report 2011/2012. Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal.
DonaldP.F., GreenR.E. & HeathM.F. (2001) Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe's bird populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 268, 2529.
EigenbrodF., ArmsworthP.R., AndersonB.J., HeinemeyerA., GillingsS., RoyD.B. et al. (2010) Error propagation associated with benefits transfer-based mapping of ecosystem services. Biological Conservation, 143, 24872493.
ErikssonM., JianChuX., ShresthaA.B., VaidyaR.A., NepalS. & SandströmK. (2009) The Changing Himalayas: Impact of Climate Change on Water Resources and Livelihoods in the Greater Himalayas. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Kathmandu, Nepal.
FeldC., SousaJ., da SilvaP. & DawsonT. (2010) Indicators for biodiversity and ecosystem services: towards an improved framework for ecosystems assessment. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19, 28952919.
FishpoolL.D.C. & EvansM.I. (eds) (2001) Important Bird Areas in Africa and Associated Islands: Priority Sites for Conservation. BirdLife Conservation Series No. 11. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
GregoryR.D., NobleD., FieldR., MarchantJ., RavenM. & GibbonsD.W. (2003) Using birds as indicators of biodiversity. Ornis Hungarica, 12, 1124.
HeinL., van KoppenK., de GrootR. S. & van IerlandE.C. (2006) Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 57, 209228.
HMGN/MFSC (2002) Nepal Biodiversity Strategy. His Majesty's Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
HMGN/NPC/MOPE (2003) Sustainable Development Agenda for Nepal. His Majesty's Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
IFAD (2013) Rural Poverty Portal. Rural Poverty in Nepal. Http://www.ruralpovertyportal.org/country/home/tags/nepal [accessed 2 December 2013].
IUCN (2011) Threats Classification Scheme (Version 3.0). Http://www.iucnredlist.org [accessed 14 June 2011].
KainerK.A., DiGianoM.L., DuchelleA.E., WadtL.H.O., BrunaE. & DainJ.L. (2009) Partnering for greater success: local stakeholders and research in tropical biology and conservation. Biotropica, 41, 555562.
KariS. & Korhonen-KurkiK. (2013) Framing local outcomes of biodiversity conservation through ecosystem services: a case study from Ranomafana, Madagascar. Ecosystem Services, 3, e32e39.
LaykeC., MapendembeA., BrownC., WalpoleM. & WinnJ. (2012) Indicators from the global and sub-global millennium ecosystem assessments: an analysis and next steps. Ecological Indicators, 17, 7787.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.
PehK.S.-H., BalmfordA.P., BradburyR.B., BrownC., ButchartS.H.M., HughesF.M.R. et al. (2013) TESSA: a toolkit for rapid assessment of ecosystem services at sites of biodiversity conservation importance. Ecosystem Services, 5, e51e57.
PehK.S.-H., BalmfordA.P., BradburyR.B., BrownC., ButchartS.H.M., HughesF.M.R. et al. (2013) Toolkit for Ecosystem Service Site-based Assessment (TESSA). Http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/info/estoolkit [accessed 12 September 2013].
Poverty-Environment Initiative (2010) Nepal Programme Framework. National Planning Commission, Ministry of Local Development, UNDP Nepal, UNDP/UNEP PEI, Kathmandu, Nepal.
ReedM. S. (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation, 141, 24172431.
RoeD., ElliottJ., SandbrookC. & WalpoleM. (eds) (2013) Biodiversity Conservation and Poverty Alleviation: Exploring the Evidence for a Link. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK.
SeppeltR., DormannC.F., EppinkF.V., LautenbachS. & SchmidtS. (2011) A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48, 630636.
TEEB (2010) The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations. Earthscan, London, UK.
ThapaI., GurungH. & BirchJ.C. (2013) Important bird areas in Nepal deliver vital ecosystem services to people. Ibisbill, 2, 8792.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Oryx
  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 26
Total number of PDF views: 183 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 410 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.