Skip to main content Accessibility help

Who benefits from ecosystem services? Analysing recreational moose hunting in Vermont, USA

  • Nelson Grima (a1), Brendan Fisher (a1), Taylor H. Ricketts (a1) and Laura J. Sonter (a1)


Ecosystem services typically benefit multiple groups of people. However, natural resource management decisions aiming to secure ecosystem services for one beneficiary group rarely consider potential consequences for others. Here, we examine records of moose hunting in Vermont, USA, a recreational ecosystem service with at least two beneficiary groups: hunters, who benefit from recreational experiences and moose meat, and residents, who live in hunting areas and benefit from hunters’ expenditures. We ask how the allocation of hunting permits has affected (1) the total number of hunters and therefore the benefits enjoyed by this group, (2) the benefits residents received, and (3) the spatial distribution of benefits for each group. We found that changes in the allocation of permits had heterogeneous effects on the beneficiaries. For example, increasing the number of hunting permits increased the total number of hunters, but not necessarily the number of residents who potentially benefit. Also, a more balanced distribution of permits across Vermont increased the total number of potentially benefiting residents, but not those from lower socio-economic groups. Understanding these differences and interactions between beneficiary groups is necessary to distribute benefits equitably amongst them.


Corresponding author

(Corresponding author) E-mail


Hide All

Also at: Gund Institute for Environment, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA

Also at: School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, and Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia



Hide All
Arnett, E.B. & Southwick, R. (2015) Economic and social benefits of hunting in North America. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 72, 734745.
Auger, D. (2006) Importance of big-game non-resident hunters: the case of moose hunting in the state of Maine. Turizam: Međunarodni Znanstveno-Stručni časopis, 54, 271285.
Balmford, A., Bruner, A., Cooper, P., Costanza, R., Farber, S., Green, E.R. et al. (2002) Economic reasons for conserving nature. Science, 297, 950953.
Balmford, A., Green, J.M.H., Anderson, M., Beresford, J., Huang, C., Naidoo, R. et al. (2015) Walk on the wild side: estimating the global magnitude of visits to protected areas. PLOS Biology, 13, e1002074.
Brooks, E.G.E., Smith, K.G., Holland, R.A., Poppy, G.M. & Eigenbrod, F. (2014) Effects of methodology and stakeholder disaggregation on ecosystem service valuation. Ecology and Society, 19, 18.
Carpenter, S.R., Mooney, H.A., Agard, J., Capistrano, D., DeFries, R.S., Diaz, S. et al. (2009) Science for managing ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 13051312.
Daily, G.C., Polasky, S., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P.M., Mooney, H.A., Pejchar, L. et al. (2009) Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7, 2128.
Daniel, T.C., Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., Aznar, O., Boyd, J.W., Chan, K.M.A. et al. (2012) Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 88128819.
Daw, T., Brown, K., Rosendo, S. & Pomeroy, R. (2011) Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: the need to disaggregate human well-being. Environmental Conservation, 38, 370379.
Dickson, B., Hutton, J. & Adams, W.A. (eds) (2009) Recreational Hunting, Conservation and Rural Livelihoods: Science and Practice. 1st edition. Wiley–Blackwell, Chichester, UK.
Duraiappah, A.K., Asah, S.T., Brondizio, E.S., Kosoy, N., O'Farrell, P.J., Prieur-Richard, A.-H. et al. (2014) Managing the mismatches to provide ecosystem services for human well-being: a conceptual framework for understanding the New Commons. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 7, 94100.
ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute) (2012) ArcGIS Release 10.1. ESRI, Redlands, USA.
Ferraro, P.J., Hanauer, M.M., Miteva, D.A., Nelson, J.L., Pattanayak, S.K., Nolte, C. & Sims, K.R.E. (2015) Estimating the impacts of conservation on ecosystem services and poverty by integrating modeling and evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, 74207425.
Fisher, B., Turner, R.K. & Morling, P. (2009) Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 68, 643653.
Fisher, B., Kulindwa, K., Mwanyoka, I., Turner, R.K. & Burgess, N.D. (2010) Common pool resource management and PES: lessons and constraints for water PES in Tanzania. Ecological Economics, 69, 12531261.
Fisher, B., Bradbury, R.B., Andrews, J.E., Ausden, M., Bentham-Green, S., White, S.M. & Gill, J.A. (2011) Impacts of species-led conservation on ecosystem services of wetlands: understanding co-benefits and tradeoffs. Biodiversity and Conservation, 20, 24612481.
Hartig, T., Evans, G.W., Jamner, L.D., Davis, D.S. & Gärling, T. (2003) Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 109123.
Hein, L., van Koppen, K., de Groot, R.S. & van Ierland, E.C. (2006) Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 57, 209228.
Horcea-Milcu, A.-I., Leventon, J., Hanspach, J. & Fischer, J. (2016) Disaggregated contributions of ecosystem services to human well-being: a case study from Eastern Europe. Regional Environmental Change, 16, 17791791.
Knoche, S. & Lupi, F. (2007) Valuing deer hunting ecosystem services from farm landscapes. Ecological Economics, 64, 313320.
Larsen, F.W., Turner, W.R. & Mittermeier, R.A. (2015) Will protection of 17% of land by 2020 be enough to safeguard biodiversity and critical ecosystem services? Oryx, 49, 7479.
Levin, S., Xepapadeas, T., Crépin, A.-S., Norberg, J., Zeeuw, A., de Folke, C. et al. (2013) Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems: modeling and policy implications. Environment and Development Economics, 18, 111132.
Ljung, P.E., Riley, S.J., Heberlein, T.A. & Ericsson, G. (2015) Eat prey and love: game-meat consumption and attitudes toward hunting. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 36, 669675.
Lyytimäki, J. (2015) Ecosystem disservices: embrace the catchword. Ecosystem Services, 12, 136.
Mann, C., Loft, L. & Hansjürgens, B. (2015) Governance of ecosystem services: lessons learned for sustainable institutions. Ecosystem Services, 16, 275281.
McDonald, J.H. (2014) Handbook of Biological Statistics. 3rd edition. Sparky House Publishing, Baltimore, USA.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.
Myers, S.S. & Patz, J.A. (2009) Emerging threats to human health from global environmental change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34, 223252.
Norgaard, R.B. (2010) Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecological Economics, 69, 12191227.
Polasky, S., Nelson, E., Pennington, D. & Johnson, K.A. (2011) The impact of land-use change on ecosystem services, biodiversity and returns to landowners: a case study in the State of Minnesota. Environmental and Resource Economics, 48, 219242.
Porter, M., Mwaipopo, R., Faustine, R. & Mzuma, M. (2008) Globalization and women in coastal communities in Tanzania. Development, 51, 193198.
R Core Team (2017) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Reyers, B., Biggs, R., Cumming, G.S., Elmqvist, T., Hejnowicz, A.P. & Polasky, S. (2013) Getting the measure of ecosystem services: a social–ecological approach. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11, 268273.
Sen, A., Harwood, A.R., Bateman, I.J., Munday, P., Crowe, A., Brander, L. et al. (2014) Economic assessment of the recreational value of ecosystems: methodological development and national and local application. Environmental and Resource Economics, 57, 233249.
Shanahan, D.F., Bush, R., Gaston, K.J., Lin, B.B., Dean, J., Barber, E. & Fuller, R.A. (2016) Health benefits from nature experiences depend on dose. Scientific Reports, 6, 28551.
Sonter, L.J., Watson, K.B., Wood, S.A. & Ricketts, T.H. (2016) Spatial and temporal dynamics and value of nature-based recreation, estimated via social media. PLOS ONE, 11, e0162372.
State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources (2018) Natural Resources Atlas. [accessed 6 October 2018].
Turner, R.K., van den Bergh, J.C.J.M., Söderqvist, T., Barendregt, A., van der Straaten, J., Maltby, E. & van Ierland, E.C. (2000) Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: scientific integration for management and policy. Ecological Economics, 35, 723.
U.S. Census Bureau (2017) QuickFacts: Burlington City, Vermont. [accessed 8 November 2018].
U.S. Census Bureau (2018) Municipalities in Vermont. [accessed 6 June 2018].
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2014) 2011 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. FHW/11-VT (RV). [accessed 27 February 2019].
Vatn, A. (2010) An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 69, 12451252.
Vermont Center for Geographic Information (2018) Geography of the Municipalities of Vermont. [accessed 10 June 2018].
Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department (2012) 2011 Vermont Wildlife Harvest Report – Moose. Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department, Agency of Natural Resources, Waterbury, Vermont, USA.
Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department (2006) The Future of Hunting in Vermont: Conference Report. Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department, Agency of Natural Resources, Waterbury, Vermont, USA.
Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department (2009) Big Game Management Plan 2010–2020: Creating A Road Map for the Future. Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department, Agency of Natural Resources, Waterbury, Vermont, USA.
Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department (2018a) Hunt. [accessed 20 May 2018].
Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department (2018b) Moose. [accessed 7 November 2018].
Wieland, R., Ravensbergen, S., Gregr, E.J., Satterfield, T. & Chan, K.M.A. (2016) Debunking trickle-down ecosystem services: the fallacy of omnipotent, homogeneous beneficiaries. Ecological Economics, 121, 175180.
Yahdjian, L., Sala, O.E. & Havstad, K.M. (2015) Rangeland ecosystem services: shifting focus from supply to reconciling supply and demand. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 13, 4451.



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed