Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-npccv Total loading time: 0.268 Render date: 2022-10-01T06:27:17.155Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Article contents

Paleoecology of the oldest known animal communities: Ediacaran assemblages at Mistaken Point, Newfoundland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Matthew E. Clapham
Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada. E-mail:
Guy M. Narbonne
Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada. E-mail:
James G. Gehling
Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada. E-mail:


Ediacaran fossils at Mistaken Point, southeastern Newfoundland (terminal Neoproterozoic; 565–575 Ma) represent the oldest known animal communities. In contrast to most Phanerozoic fossil assemblages, in which postmortem transportation, bioturbation, and the accumulation of hardparts obscure community relationships, all fossils in the Mistaken Point assemblages were sessile, soft-bodied organisms that show no evidence of mobility in life or transportation after death. Mistaken Point assemblages are spectacularly preserved on large bedding planes as in situ census populations of hundreds to thousands of fossils, recording the living soft-bodied benthic community at the moment it was smothered by volcanic ash. This unique preservation style allows ecological tests routinely conducted in modern communities (e.g., species richness, abundance, “biomass,” diversity, and evenness, as well as statistical tests of nearest-neighbor interactions) to be applied to the fossil communities. Observed patterns of community variability are consistent with the theory that Mistaken Point fossil surfaces are “snapshots” recording different stages of ecological succession, progressing from communities of low-level feeders (e.g., pectinates and spindles) to frond-dominated communities with complex tiering and spatial structure. The presence of diverse slope communities at Mistaken Point suggests that the deep sea was colonized rapidly during the evolution of complex organisms. Species richness, abundance, and diversity values, as well as levels of intraspecific interaction, all fall within the typical range observed in modern slope communities. These structural similarities imply that ecological processes present in Ediacaran communities at Mistaken Point were strikingly similar to the processes that operate in modern deep-sea animal communities.

Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Literature Cited

Anderson, M. 1992. Spatial analysis of two-species interactions. Oecologia 91:134140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M. M., and Morris, S. Conway 1982. A review, with descriptions of four unusual forms, of the soft-bodied fauna of the Conception and St. John's groups (late-Precambrian), Avalon Peninsula, Newfoundland. Pp. 18in Mamet, B. and Copeland, M. J., eds. Proceedings of the Third North American Paleontological Convention. Université de Montreal, Montreal, and Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. M., and Misra, S. B. 1968. Fossils found in the Pre-Cambrian Conception Group of south-eastern Newfoundland. Nature 220:680681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellingham, P. J. 1998. Shrub succession and invasibility in a New Zealand montane grassland. Australian Journal of Ecology 23:562573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benus, A. P. 1988. Sedimentological context of a deep-water Ediacaran fauna (Mistaken Point, Avalon Zone, eastern Newfoundland). Pp. 89in Landing, E., Narbonne, G. M., and Myrow, P. M., eds. Trace fossils, small shelly fossils and the Precambrian-Cambrian Boundary. New York State Museum and Geological Survey Bulletin 463.Google Scholar
Billings, E. 1872. Fossils in Huronian rocks. Canadian Naturalist and Quarterly Journal of Science 6:478.Google Scholar
Caley, M. J., and Schluter, D. 1997. The relationship between local and regional diversity. Ecology 78:7080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. J. 1992. Nearest-neighbour graphical analysis of spatial pattern and a test for competition in populations of singing crickets (Teleogryllus commodus). Oecologia 92:548551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. J. 1996. Aggregation and regularity: an inclusive one-tailed nearest-neighbour analysis of small spatially patchy populations. Oecologia 106:206211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clapham, M. E., and Narbonne, G. M. 2002. Ediacaran epifaunal tiering. Geology 30:627630.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, P. J., and Evans, F. C. 1954. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in a population. Ecology 35:445453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, K. R. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology 18:117143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clebsch, E. E. C., and Busing, R. T. 1989. Secondary succession, gap dynamics, and community structure in a southern Appalachian cove forest. Ecology 70:728735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, J. H. 1978. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199:13021310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coomes, D. A., Rees, M., and Turnbull, L. 1999. Identifying aggregation and association in fully mapped spatial data. Ecology 800:554565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copper, P. 1988. Ecological succession in Phanerozoic reef ecosystems: is it real? Palaios 3:136152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosson-Sarradin, N., Sibuet, M., Paterson, G. L. J., and Vangriesheim, A. 1998. Polychaete diversity at tropical Atlantic deep-sea sites: environmental effects. Marine Ecology Progress Series 165:173185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalrymple, R. W., and Narbonne, G. M. 1996. Continental slope sedimentation in the Sheepbed Formation (Neoproterozoic, Windermere Supergroup), Mackenzie Mountains, N.W.T. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 33:848862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Death, R. G. 1996. The effect of habitat stability on benthic invertebrate communities: the utility of species abundance distributions. Hydrobiologia 317:97107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, P. 1994. Testing spatial segregation using a nearest-neighbor contingency table. Ecology 75:19401948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drobner, U., Bibby, J., Smith, B., and Wilson, J. B. 1998. The relation between community biomass and evenness: what does community theory predict, and can these predictions be tested? Oikos 82:295302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedonkin, M. A. 1992. Vendian faunas and the early evolution of Metazoa. Pp. 87129in Lipps, J. H. and Signor, P. W., eds. Origin and early evolution of the Metazoa. Plenum, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, J. G., Clarke, K. R., and Warwick, R. M. 1982. A practical strategy for analysing multispecies distribution patterns. Marine Ecology Progress Series 8:3752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, T. D. 1999. The Precambrian fossils of Charnwood Forest. Geology Today 14:230234.Google Scholar
Fürsich, F. T., and Aberhan, M. 1990. Significance of time-averaging for paleocommunity analysis. Lethaia 23:143152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehling, J. G., and Rigby, J. K. 1996. Long expected sponges from the Neoproterozoic Ediacara fauna of South Australia. Journal of Paleontology 70:185195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehling, J. G., Narbonne, G. M., and Anderson, M. M. 2000. The first named Ediacaran body fossil, Aspidella terranovica. Palaeontology 43:427–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaessner, M. F. 1984. The dawn of animal life: a biohistorical study. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Grassle, J. F., and Maciolek, N. J. 1992. Deep-sea species richness: regional and local diversity estimates from quantitative bottom samples. American Naturalist 139:313341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grassle, J. F., Sanders, H. L., Hessler, R. R., Rowe, G. T., and McLellan, T. 1975. Pattern and zonation: a study of the bathyal megafauna using the research submersible Alvin. Deep-Sea Research 22:457481.Google Scholar
Gutt, J., Helsen, E., Arntz, W., and Buschmann, A. 1999. Biodiversity and community structure of the mega-epibenthos in the Magellan region (South America). Scientia Marina 63(Suppl. 1):155170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haase, P. 2001. Can isotropy vs. anisotropy in the spatial association of plant species reveal physical vs. biotic facilitation? Journal of Vegetation Science 12:127136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helm, D. J., and Allen, E. B. 1995. Vegetation chronosequence near Exit Glacier, Kenai Fjords National Park, Alaska, U.S.A. Arctic and Alpine Research 27:246257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, R. J. F. 1992. Functional and ecological aspects of Ediacaran assemblages. Pp. 131176in Jipps, J. H. and Signor, P. W., eds. Origin and early evolution of the Metazoa. Plenum, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, R. J. F., and Gehling, J. G. 1978. A review of the frondlike fossils of the Ediacara assemblage. South Australian Museum Records 17:347359.Google Scholar
Kidwell, S. M. 1993. Patterns of time-averaging in the shallow marine fossil record. In Kidwell, S. M. and Behrensmeyer, A. K., eds. Taphonomic approaches to time resolution in fossil assemblages. Short Courses in Paleontology 9:275300.Google Scholar
Lichter, J. 1998. Primary succession and forest development on coastal Lake Michigan sand dunes. Ecological Monographs 68:487510.Google Scholar
Lukaszewski, Y., Arnott, S. E., and Frost, T. M. 1999. Regional versus local processes in determining zooplankton community composition of Little Rock Lake, Wisconsin, USA. Journal of Plankton Research 21:9911003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacNaughton, R. B., Narbonne, G. M., and Dalrymple, R. W. 2000. Neoproterozoic slope deposits, Mackenzie Mountains, northwestern Canada: implications for passive-margin development and Ediacaran faunal ecology. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 37:9971020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, M. W., Grazhdankin, D. V., Bowring, S. A., Evans, D. A. D., Fedonkin, M. A., and Kirschvink, J. L. 2000. Age of Neoproterozoic bilaterian body and trace fossils, White Sea, Russia: implications for metazoan evolution. Science 288:841845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayer, M., and Piepenburg, D. 1996. Epibenthic community patterns on the continental slope off East Greenland at 75° N. Marine Ecology Progress Series 143:151164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCune, B., and Mefford, M. J. 1999. PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data, Version 4.0. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Ore.Google Scholar
McMenamin, M. A. S. 1986. The Garden of Ediacara. Palaios 1:178182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menge, B. A. 2000. Recruitment vs. postrecruitment processes as determinants of barnacle population abundance. Ecological Monographs 70:265288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menge, B. A., Lubchenco, J., and Ashkenas, L. R. 1985. Diversity, heterogeneity and consumer pressure in a tropical rocky intertidal community. Oecologia 65:394405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, W. 1986. Paleoecology of benthic community replacement. Lethaia 19:225231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misra, S. B. 1969. Late Precambrian (?) fossils from southeastern Newfoundland. Geological Society of America Bulletin 80:21332140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misra, S. B. 1971. Stratigraphy and depositional history of late Precambrian coelenterate-bearing rocks, southeastern Newfoundland. Geological Society of America Bulletin 82:979988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misra, S. B. 1981. Depositional environment of the late Precambrian fossil-bearing rocks of southeastern Newfoundland, Canada. Journal of the Geological Society of India 22:375382.Google Scholar
Myrow, P. M. 1995. Neoproterozoic rocks of the Newfoundland Avalon Zone. Precambrian Research 73:123136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narbonne, G. M. 1998. The Ediacara biota: a terminal Neoproterozoic experiment in the evolution of life. GSA Today 8(2):16.Google Scholar
Narbonne, G. M., and Aitken, J. D. 1990. Ediacaran fossils from the Sekwi Brook area, Mackenzie Mountains, northwestern Canada. Palaeontology 33:945980.Google Scholar
Narbonne, G. M., and Gehling, J. G. 2003. Life after Snowball: the oldest complex Ediacaran fossils. Geology 31:2730.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narbonne, G. M., Dalrymple, R. W., and Gehling, J. G. 2001. Neoproterozoic fossils and environments of the Avalon Peninsula, Newfoundland. Guidebook, Trip B5, Geological Association of Canada/Mineralogical Association of Canada Annual Meeting, St. John's, Newfoundland.Google Scholar
Nicol, D. 1962. The biotic development of some Niagaran reefs: an example of an ecological succession or sere. Journal of Paleontology 36:172176.Google Scholar
Powell, E. N., Parsons-Hubbard, K. M., Callender, W. R., Staff, G. M., Rowe, G. T., Brett, C. E., Walker, S. E., Raymond, A., Carlson, D. D., White, S., and Heise, E. A. 2002. Taphonomy on the continental shelf and slope: two-year trends, Gulf of Mexico and Bahamas. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 184:135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seilacher, A. 1992. Vendobionta and Psammocorallia: lost constructions of Precambrian evolution. Journal of the Geological Society, London 149:607613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seilacher, A. 1999. Biomat-related lifestyles in the Precambrian. Palaios 14:8693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seitz, R. D., and Lipicus, R. N. 2001. Variation in top-down and bottom-up control of marine bivalves at differing spatial scales. ICES Journal of Marine Science 58:689699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. R., and Hamilton, S. C. 1983. Epibenthic megafauna of a bathyal basin off southern California: patterns of abundance, biomass, and dispersion. Deep-Sea Research 30:907928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thrush, S. F. 1991. Spatial patterns in soft-bottom communities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6:7579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vetter, E. W., and Dayton, P. K. 1999. Organic enrichment by macrophyte detritus, and abundance patterns of megafaunal populations in submarine canyons. Marine Ecology Progress Series 186:137148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, S. 1995. Ectomycorrhizal fungal succession in jack pine stands following wildfire. New Phytologist 129:389401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waggoner, B. M. 1998. Interpreting the earliest Metazoan fossils: what can we learn? American Zoologist 38:975982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waggoner, B. M. 1999. Biogeographic analyses of the Ediacara biota: a conflict with paleotectonic reconstructions. Paleobiology 24:440458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, K. R., and Alberstadt, L. P. 1975. Ecological succession as an aspect of structure in fossil communities. Paleobiology 1:238257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, R. J. 1993. Plant population patterns in a glacier foreland succession: pioneer herbs and later-colonizing shrubs. Ecography 16:117136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, D. A., Dalrymple, R. W., Narbonne, G. M., Gehling, J. G., and Clapham, M. E.In press. Paleoenvironmental analysis of the Late Neoproterozoic Mistaken Point and Trepassey Formations, southeastern Newfoundland. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 40.Google Scholar
Wright, D. H. 1983. Species-energy theory: an extention of species-area theory. Oikos 41:496506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zou, G., and Wu, H.-I. 1995. Nearest-neighbor distribution of interacting biological entities. Journal of Theoretical Biology 172:347353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Paleoecology of the oldest known animal communities: Ediacaran assemblages at Mistaken Point, Newfoundland
Available formats

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Paleoecology of the oldest known animal communities: Ediacaran assemblages at Mistaken Point, Newfoundland
Available formats

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Paleoecology of the oldest known animal communities: Ediacaran assemblages at Mistaken Point, Newfoundland
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *