Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T11:53:54.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biomechanical stability and sudden change in the evolution of the deep-sea ostracode Poseidonamicus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Richard H. Benson
Richard H. Benson*
Affiliation:
Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Changes in shape and in the pattern of the reticulate carapace ornament of 63 representative female ostracode specimens of the deep-sea genus Poseidonamicus from 28 Deep Sea Drilling Project Sites, extending over a geographic distance of 40,000 miles and a geologic age of 40 × 106 yr, have been analyzed by Resistant Fit Theta-Rho Analysis, conventional least-squares Theta-Rho Analysis, and by inspection of homologies in the fossae of the reticulum. Through comparison of the relative rates of morphological change on at least three levels of integrated complexity, it is possible to demonstrate that a sudden evolutionary change in the architectural framework of the carapace can be the product of mechanical accommodation under stress to more gradual and general changes in carapace shape. Certain geometric imperatives related to these mechanical needs determine morphologic stability and consequently rates of evolutionary change. In the western deep South Atlantic (near the Vema Channel on the Rio Grande Rise), an important evolutionary “punctuational event” seems to have taken place at about 14 Myr, whereas its concomitant, more gradual transformation is traceable in the shallower eastern South Atlantic (Walvis Ridge). This evolutionary event in Poseidonamicus probably reflects the relatively sudden invasion of deep Antarctic Bottom Water through the Vema Channel resulting from the formation of the East Antarctic Ice Cap, while the more gradual transition in shallower depths of Walvis Ridge represents a temporary transitory refuge. The problems of recognizing allopatric origins of species in the deep sea compared to in situ sudden transitions caused by biomechanical instability are considered.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , Fall 1983 , pp. 398 - 413
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Benson, R. H. 1972. The Bradleya problem with descriptions of two new psychrospheric ostracode genera, Agrenocythere and Poseidonamicus (Ostracoda: Crustacea). Smithsonian Contr. Paleobio. 12:1–138.Google Scholar
Benson, R. H. 1974. The role of ornamentation in the design and function of the ostracode carapace. Geosci. Man (La. State Univ.) 4:47–57.Google Scholar
Benson, R. H. 1975. Morphologic stability in Ostracoda. Bull. Am. Paleontol. 65(282):13–46.Google Scholar
Benson, R. H. 1976. The evolution of the ostracode Costa analyzed by “Theta-Rho difference.” Abh. Verh. Naturwiss. Vereins Hamburg (NF). 18/19(suppl.):127–139.Google Scholar
Benson, R. H. 1977. Evolution of Oblitacythereis from Paleocosta (Ostracoda: Trachyleberididae) during the Cenozoic in the Mediterranean and Atlantic. Smithsonian Contr. Paleobiol. 33:1–47.Google Scholar
Benson, R. H. 1981. Form, function, and architecture of ostracode shells. Ann. Rev. Earth Planetary Sci. 9:59–80.Google Scholar
Benson, R. H. 1982. Comparative transformation of shape in a rapidly evolving series of structural morphotypes of the ostracode Bradleya. In: Bate, R. H., Robinson, E., and Sheppard, L. M., eds. Fossil and Recent Ostracods. British Micropalaeontological Society and E. Horwood, Ltd.; Chichester.Google Scholar
Benson, R. H., Chapman, R. E., and Siegel, A. F. 1982. On the measurement of morphology and its change. Paleobiology. 8:328–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, R. H. 1982. Deformation, DaVinci's concept of form, and the analysis of events in evolutionary history. In: Gallitelli, E. M., ed. Proc. 1st Int. Meeting on “Paleontology, Essential of Historical Geology”; Fondazione Giorgio Cini, Venice.Google Scholar
Benson, R. H. and Peypouquet, J.-P. 1983. The Upper and Mid-bathyal Cenozoic ostracode faunas of the Rio Grande Rise found on Leg 72 (DSDP). Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. 72:in press.Google Scholar
Liebau, A. 1977. Carapace ornamentation of the Ostracoda. Pp. 107–120. In: Loffler, H., and Danielopol, D., eds. Aspects of Ecology and Zoogeography of Recent and Fossil Ostracoda. W. Junk; The Hague.Google Scholar
Okada, Y. 1981. Development of cell arrangement in ostracod carapaces. Paleobiology. 7:276–280.Google Scholar
Okada, Y. 1982a. Structure and cuticle formation of the reticulated carapace of the ostracode Biocornucythere disanensis. Lethaia. 15:85–101.Google Scholar
Okada, Y. 1982b. Ultrastructure and Pattern of the Carapace of Biocornucythere bisanensis (ostracoda, Crustacea). Pp. 229–255. In: Hanai, T., ed. Studies on Japanese Ostracoda. Univ. Tokyo Press; Tokyo.Google Scholar
Olson, E. C. and Miller, R. L. 1958. Morphological Integration. 317 pp. Univ. Chicago Press; Chicago.Google Scholar
Siegel, A. F. and Benson, R. H. 1982. A robust comparison of biological shapes. Biometrics. 38:341–350.Google Scholar