Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T09:55:43.329Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Both Neonate and Elder: The First Fossil of 1557

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Stephen Jay Gould*
Affiliation:
Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138

Extract

Human vanity always drives us to elevate the ordinary. “He put a feather in his cap and called it macaroni…. Yankee doodle dandy.” The Oxford English Dictionary gives the appropriate definition (not pasta in this case) as “an exquisite of a class which arose in England about 1760 and consisted of young men who had traveled and affected the tastes and fashions prevalent in continental society … a fop.” In a standard Renaissance version of this universal tendency, scholars translated their common names into the ancient tongues of a classical world that had, in their firm conviction, learned everything worth knowing. Thus, Georg Bauer (literally George the farmer), became Georgius Agricola (the same, but in Latin) and published, under this prettified name, the first great geological treatise (De natura fossilium plus four shorter works) in 1546. But Philipp Schwartzerd (Mr. black earth) tried to conquer his cultivator by reinventing himself in even classier Greek–becoming Philipp Melanchthon (the same Mr. black earth in Athenian splendor), the right-hand man of Martin Luther and the Reformation.

Type
Conceptual Index Fossils: Number 1
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Agricola, G. 1546. De natura fossilium (and four additional geological treatises). Froben, Basel. Translated by Bandy, M. C. and Bandy, J. A., 1955, as Textbook of minerology. Geological Society of America Special Paper 63.Google Scholar
Agricola, G. 1556. De re metallica. Froben, Basel.Google Scholar
Agricola, G. 1912. De re metallica. Translated by Hoover, H. C. and Hoover, L. H.The Mining Magazine, London. Reprint, 1950, Dover, New York.Google Scholar
Bauhin, J. 1598. Historiae fontis et balnei admirabilis Bollensis, Liber quartus de lapidibus. J. Foillet, Monbellard.Google Scholar
Cohen, H. F. 1994. The scientific revolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Encelius, C. 1557. De re metallica, hoc est, de origine, varietate, et natura corporum metallicorum, lapidum, gemmarum, etc. C. Egenolph, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Gesner, C. 1565. De rerum fossilium lapidum et gemmarum. J. Gesner, Zurich.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 2001. “When fossils were young.” In I have landed. Harmony Books, New York.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. 1965. On the shoulders of giants. The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Rondelet, G. 1554. Libri de piscibus marinis. M. Bonhomme, Lyons.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S. 1972. The meaning of fossils. Elsevier, London.Google Scholar
Shapin, S. 1996. The scientific revolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar