Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Does my posterior look big in this? The effect of photographic distortion on morphometric analyses

  • Katie S. Collins (a1) and Michael F. Gazley (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

Most geometric morphometric studies are underpinned by sets of photographs of specimens. The camera lens distorts the images it takes, and the extent of the distortion will depend on factors such as the make and model of the lens and camera and user-controlled variation such as the zoom of the lens. Any study that uses populations of geometric data digitized from photographs will have shape variation introduced into the data set simply by the photographic process. We illustrate the nature and magnitude of this error using a 30-specimen data set of Recent New Zealand Mactridae (Mollusca: Bivalvia), using only a single camera and camera lens with four different photographic setups. We then illustrate the use of retrodeformation in Adobe Photoshop and test the magnitude of the variation in the data set using multivariate Procrustes analysis of variance. The effect of photographic method on the variance in the data set is significant, systematic, and predictable and, if not accounted for, could lead to misleading results, suggest clustering of specimens in ordinations that has no biological basis, or induce artificial oversplitting of taxa. Recommendations to minimize and quantify distortion include: (1) that studies avoid mixing data sets from different cameras, lenses, or photographic setups; (2) that studies avoid placing specimens or scale bars near the edges of the photographs; (3) that the same camera settings are maintained (as much as practical) for every image in a data set; (4) that care is taken when using full-frame cameras; and (5) that a reference grid is used to correct for or quantify distortion.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

D. C. Adams , and E. Otárola-Castillo . 2013. geomorph: an R package for the collection and analysis of geometric morphometric shape data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4:393399.

M. L. Aguirre , S. I. Perez , and Y. N. Sirch . 2006. Morphological variability of Brachidontes Swainson (Bivalvia, Mytilidae) in the marine Quaternary of Argentina (SW Atlantic). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 239:100125.

M. L. Aguirre , S. Richiano , A. Alvarez , and E. A. Farinati . 2016. Reading shell shape: implications for palaeoenvironmental reconstructions. A case study for bivalves from the marine Quaternary of Argentina (south-western Atlantic). Historical Biology 28:753773.

M. J Anderson . 2001. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology 26:3246.

M. J. Anderson , and C. J. F. Ter Braak . 2003. Permutation tests for multi-factorial analysis of variance. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 73:85113.

F. L. Bookstein 1997. Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape. Medical Image Analysis 1:225243.

R. M. Clouse , B. L. de Bivort , and G. Giribet . 2009. A phylogenetic analysis for the South-east Asian mite harvestman family Stylocellidae (Opiliones: Cyphophthalmi)—a combined analysis using morphometric and molecular data. Invertebrate Systematics 23:515529.

K. S. Collins , J. S. Crampton , and M. Hannah . 2013. Identification and independence: morphometrics of Cenozoic New Zealand Spissatella and Eucrassatella (Bivalvia, Crassatellidae). Paleobiology 39:525537.

K. S. Collins , J. S. Crampton , and M. Hannah . 2014. Stratocladistic analysis and taxonomic revision of the character-poor New Zealand crassatellid bivalves Spissatella and Eucrassatella . Journal of Molluscan Studies 81:104123.

D. W. Cromey 2010. Avoiding twisted pixels: ethical guidelines for the appropriate use and manipulation of scientific digital images. Science and Engineering Ethics 16:639667.

B. L. de Bivort , R. M. Clouse , and G. Giribet . 2010. A morphometrics-based phylogeny of the temperate Gondwanan mite harvestmen (Opiliones, Cyphophthalmi, Pettalidae). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 48:294309.

W. L. Fink , and M. L. Zelditch . 1995. Phylogenetic analysis of ontogenetic shape transformations: a reassessment of the piranha genus Pygocentrus (Teleostei). Systematic Biology 44:343360.

G. F. Gómez , E. J. Márquez , L. A. Gutiérrez , J. E. Conn , and M. M. Correa . 2014. Geometric morphometric analysis of Colombian Anopheles albimanus (Diptera: Culicidae) reveals significant effect of environmental factors on wing traits and presence of a metapopulation. Acta Tropica 135:7585.

C. P. Klingenberg , and N. A. Gidaszewski . 2010. Testing and quantifying phylogenetic signals and homoplasy in morphometric data. Systematic Biology 59:245261.

F. Márquez , J. Robledo , G. E. Peñaloza , and S. Van der Molen . 2010. Use of different geometric morphometrics tools for the discrimination of phenotypic stocks of the striped clam Ameghinomya antiqua (Veneridae) in north Patagonia, Argentina. Fisheries Research 101:127131.

L. R. Monteiro , A. P. M. Di Benetto , L. H. Guillermo , and L. A. Rivera . 2005. Allometric changes and shape differentiation of sagitta otoliths in sciaenid fishes. Fisheries Research 74:288299.

A. M. Muir , P. Vecsei , and C. C. Krueger . 2012. A perspective on perspectives: methods to reduce variation in shape analysis of digital images. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 141:11611170.

S. I. Perez , V. Bernal , and P. N. Gonzalez . 2006. Differences between sliding semi-landmark methods in geometric morphometrics, with an application to human craniofacial and dental variation. Journal of Anatomy 208:769784.

C.-H. Tsai , and R. E. Fordyce . 2014. Disparate heterochronic processes in baleen whale evolution. Evolutionary Biology 41:299307.

M. L. Zelditch , F. L. Bookstein , and B. L. Lundrigan . 1992. Ontogeny of integrated skull growth in the cotton rat Sigmodon fulviventer . Evolution 46:11641180.

M. L. Zelditch , H. D. Sheets , and W. L. Fink . 2000. Spatiotemporal reorganization of growth rates in the evolution of ontogeny. Evolution 54:13631371.

M. L. Zelditch , D. L. Swiderski , H. D. Sheets , and W. L. Fink . 2004. Geometric morphometrics for biologists. Elsevier Academic, London.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Paleobiology
  • ISSN: 0094-8373
  • EISSN: 1938-5331
  • URL: /core/journals/paleobiology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 9
Total number of PDF views: 70 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 491 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 13th March 2017 - 22nd August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.