Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T08:30:26.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The function of astrorhizae in stromatoporoids: quantitative tests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Michael LaBarbera
Affiliation:
Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, the University of Chicago, 1025 East 57th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637
George E. Boyajian
Affiliation:
Department of the Geophysical Sciences, The University of Chicago, 5734 Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637

Abstract

Using the diameters of the channels at branch points, we quantitatively test three alternative models of the function of astrorhizae in stromatoporoids. The distribution of diameters at branch points is significantly different from the distribution that would be predicted from models of either a diffusive function or a bulk-flow system in which resistance to flow was constant at all levels of the branching hierarchy. The distribution of channel diameters is virtually identical to that predicted by a model (Murray's law) that simultaneously minimizes resistance to flow and some volume-related cost function. Astrorhizae thus carried a bulk flow of fluid and can be inferred to have been lined with cellular elements; the exchange sites associated with the fluid-transport system were distributed throughout the soft tissues of the stromatoporoid animal. The most parsimonious hypothesis of function, that the fluid-transport system was associated with suspension feeding, implies strong similarities between the structure of the stromatoporoid animal and living sponges.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Basile, L. L., Cuffey, R. J., and Kosich, D. K. 1984. Sclerosponges, pharetronids, and sphinctozoans (relict cryptic hardbodied Porifera) in the modern reefs of Enewetak Atoll. Journal of Paleontology 58:636650.Google Scholar
Boyajian, G. E., and LaBarbera, M. 1987. Biomechanical analysis of passive flow of stromatoporoids—morphologic, paleoecologic, and systematic implications. Lethaia 20:223229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, W. D., and Goreau, T. E. 1970. Jamaican coralline sponges: their morphology, ecology, and fossil representatives. Zoological Society of London Symposium 25:205243.Google Scholar
Jackson, J.B.C. 1983. Biological determinants of present and past sessile animal distributions. Pp. 39120. In Tevesz, M. J. S., and McCall, P. L. (eds.), Biotic Interactions in Recent and Fossil Benthic Communities. Plenum Press; New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazmierczak, J., and Kempe, S. 1990. Modern cyanobacterial analogs of Paleozoic stromatoporoids. Science 250:12441248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaBarbera, M. 1990. Principles of design of fluid transport systems in zoology. Science 249:9921000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LaBarbera, M., and Vogel, S. 1982. The design of fluid transport systems in organisms. American Scientist 70:5460.Google Scholar
Murray, C. D. 1926a. The physiological principle of minimum work. I. The vascular system and the cost of blood volume. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA 12:207214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, C. D. 1926b. The physiological principle of minimum work applied to the angle of branching of arteries. Journal of General Physiology 9:835841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, H. A., and Murie, J. 1878. On the minute structure of Stromatopora and its allies. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 14:187246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, A. G., and Woldenberg, M. J. 1982. A generalization of the optimal models of arterial branching. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 44:349360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherman, T. F. 1981. On connecting large vessels to small. The meaning of Murray's law. Journal of General Physiology 78:431453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stearn, C. W. 1972. The relationship of the stromatoporoids to the sclerosponges. Lethaia 5:369388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stearn, C. W. 1975. The stromatoporoid animal. Lethaia 8:89100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stearn, C. W. 1982. The unity of the Stromatoporoidea. Proceedings of the Third North American Paleontological Convention 1:511516.Google Scholar
Stearn, C. W. 1983a. Stromatoporoids: growth and form. Pp. 141148. In Rigby, J. K., and Stearn, C. W. (eds.), Sponges and Spongiomorphs. Notes for a Short Course. University of Tennessee, Studies in Geology No. 7.Google Scholar
Stearn, C. W. 1983b. Stromatoporoids: affinity with modern organisms. Pp. 164166. In Rigby, J. K., and Stearn, C. W. (eds.), Sponges and Spongiomorphs. Notes for a Short Course. University of Tennessee, Studies in Geology No. 7.Google Scholar
Stearn, C. W. 1984. Growth forms and macrostructural elements of the coralline sponges. Palaeontographica Americana 54:315325.Google Scholar
Uylings, H.B.M. 1977. Optimization of diameters and bifurcation angles in lung and vascular tree structures. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 49:509520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, S. 1977a. Current-induced flow through living sponges in nature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA 74:20692071.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vogel, S. 1977b. Flows in organisms induced by movements of the external medium. Pp. 285297. In Pedley, T. J. (ed.), Scale Effects in Animal Locomotion. Academic Press; London.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. 1978. Organisms that capture currents. Scientific American 239:128139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, S. 1981. Life in Moving Fluids. Willard Grant Press; Boston, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Vogel, S., and Bretz, W. L. 1972. Interfacial organisms: passive ventilation in the velocity gradients near surfaces. Science 175:210211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wigglesworth, V. B. 1930. A theory of tracheal respiration in insects. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 106:229250.Google Scholar