Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T16:19:33.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Living and fossil scallop shells as airfoils: an experimental study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Itaru Hayami
Itaru Hayami*
Affiliation:
Geological Institute, University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113, Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Selected shell specimens of extant and fossil streamlined pectinids, which have or presumably had level-swimming ability, were examined experimentally to elucidate their hydrodynamic properties, in particular, airfoil efficiency estimated by lift-drag ratio. Using a stationary water tank for nautical engineering, lift and drag forces were measured at various attack angles. Of the examined species, Amusium japonicum, which is characterized by an unusually shiny surface, upward-cambered commissure and sharpened trailing edge, is the most efficient level swimmer and has the lowest drag coefficient and the highest value of lift-drag ratio at any attack angle. Amussiopecten praesignis from the Plio-Pleistocene may have swum horizontally because its airfoil efficiency is superior to that of a living level swimmer, Placopecten magellanicus. Although its shell shape is analogous to that of Placopecten, Camptonectes (Maclearnia) cinctus from the Lower Cretaceous shows a much inferior efficiency and a significant flow separation from the surface. Bernoulli's effect in convex-upward species may contribute to increase lift, but a certain attack angle is always required for level flight. The strategy of level swimming probably evolved independently in several pectinacean lineages in which swimming rather than shell robustness became the preferred defense against predators. One problem that must be solved is that some feedback mechanism is required to check pitching, rolling, and yawing of the shell to attain stability in level flight.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , Winter 1991 , pp. 1 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Baird, R. H. 1958. On the swimming behaviour of scallops (Pecten maximus L.). Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London 33:67–71.Google Scholar
Bourne, N. 1964. Scallops and the offshore fishery of the maritimes. Bulletin of Canada Fisheries Research Board 145:15–16.Google Scholar
Buddenbrock, W. Von. 1911. Untersuchungen über die Schwimmbewegungen und die Statocysten der Gattung Pecten. Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften 28:1–24.Google Scholar
Caddy, J. F. 1968. Underwater observations on scallop (Placopecten magellanicus) behaviour and drag efficiency. Journal of Fisheries Research Board of Canada 25:2123–2141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, R. M. 1972. Adaptations of British Chalk Bivalvia. Journal of Paleontology 46:325–340.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, J. A. 1976. Flow patterns and drag coefficients of cephalopod shells. Palaeontology 19:539–563.Google Scholar
Cox, L. R. 1927. Neogene and Quaternary Mollusca from the Zanzibar Protectorate. Pp. 13–102. In Davies, A. M., Cox, L. R., Stockley, G. M., Stubblefield, C. J., and White, E. I. (eds.), Report on the Palaeontology of the Zanzibar Protectorate. Government of Zanzibar.Google Scholar
Fukutomi, T. 1953. A general equation indicating the regular form of Mollusca shells, and its application to geology, especially in paleontology (1). Bulletin of Geophysics, Hokkaido University 3:63–82.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1971. Muscular mechanics and the ontogeny of swimming in scallops. Palaeontology 14:61–94.Google Scholar
Hayami, I. 1988. Functional and taxonomic implications of internal ribs of Propeamussium. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, New Series, 150:476–490.Google Scholar
Hayami, I., and Hosoda, I. 1988. Fortipecten takahashii, a reclining pectinid from the Pliocene of north Japan. Palaeontology 31:419–444.Google Scholar
Hayami, I., and Okamoto, T. 1986. Geometric regularity of some oblique sculptures in pectinid and other bivalves: recognition by computer simulations. Paleobiology 12:433–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonski, D., and Bottjer, D. J. 1983. Soft-bottom epifaunal suspension-feeding assemblages in the Cretaceous. Implications for the evolution of benthic paleocommunities. Pp. 747–812. In Tevesz, M.J.S., and McCall, P. L. (eds.), Biotic Interactions in Recent and Fossil Benthic Communities. Plenum; New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, A.L.A. 1984. The palaeobiology of the bivalve families Pectinidae and Propeamussiidae in the Jurassic of Europe. Zitteliana 11:1–235.Google Scholar
Joll, L. M. 1989. Swimming behaviour of the saucer scallop Amusium balloti (Mollusca: Pectinidae). Marine Biology 102:299–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kármán, T. Von, and Burgers, J. M. 1963. General aerodynamic theory—perfect fluids. Pp. 1–367. In Durand, W. F. (ed.), Aerodynamic Theory, Volume 2. Dover; New York.Google Scholar
Kuroda, T. 1931. An illustrated catalogue of the Japanese shells (9). Venus 3: appendix 77–86 [in Japanese].Google Scholar
Lecomte, J. 1952. Réactions de fuite des pectens en présence des astérides. Vie et Milieu 3:57–60.Google Scholar
Masuda, K. 1962. Tertiary Pectinidae of Japan. Science Reports of the Tohoku University, 2nd Series, 33:117–238.Google Scholar
Masuda, K. 1971. Amussiopecten from North America and northern South America. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, New Series, 84:205–224.Google Scholar
Morton, B. 1980. Swimming in Amusium pleuronectes (Bivalvia: Pectinidae). Journal of Zoology, London 190:375–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, N. D. 1937. Late Paleozoic pelecypods: Pectinacea. Kansas State Geological Survey, Bulletin 10:1–123.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D., and Boyd, D. W. 1985. Notes on micro-fabric in Upper Paleozoic scallops. American Museum Novitates 2816:1–6.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1966. Geometric analysis of shell coiling: general problems. Journal of Paleontology 40:1178–1190.Google Scholar
Rees, W. J. 1957. The living scallop. Pp. 17–32. In Cox, I. (ed.), The Scallop. Shell Transport and Trading Company; London.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1970. Relation of shell form to life habits of the Bivalvia (Mollusca). The Geological Society of America, Memoir 125:i–xiii, 1–296.Google Scholar
Thayer, C. W. 1972. Adaptive features of swimming monomyarian bivalves (Mollusca). Forma et Functio 5:1–32.Google Scholar
Thomas, G. E., and Gruffydd, L. D. 1971. The types of escape reactions elicited in the scallop Pecten maximus by selected sea-star species. Marine Biology 10:87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1977. The Mesozoic marine revolution: evidence from snails, predators and grazers. Paleobiology 3:245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1983. Shell-breaking predation through time. Pp. 649–669. In Tevesz, M.J.S., and McCall, P. L. (eds.), Biotic Interactions in Recent and Fossil Benthic Communities. Plenum; New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verrill, A. E. 1897. A study of the family Pectinidae, with a revision of the genera and subgenera. Transactions of Connecticut Academy of Arts and Science 10:41–95.Google Scholar
Waller, T. R. 1969. The evolution of the Argopecten gibbus stock (Mollusca: Bivalvia), with emphasis on the Tertiary and Quaternary species of eastern North America. Paleontological Society, Memoir 3 (Journal of Paleontology, 43(5) supplement):1–125.Google Scholar
Waller, T. R. 1971. The glass scallop Propeamussium, a living relict of the past. American Malacological Union, Annual Report for 1970:5–7.Google Scholar
Waller, T. R. 1975. The behavior and tentacle morphology of pteriomorphian bivalves: a motion-picture study. Bulletin of the American Malacological Union for 1975:7–13.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M. 1936. The evolution of swimming habit in the Lamellibranchia. Mémoire de la Musée Royal d'Histoire Naturelle des Belge 3:77–100.Google Scholar