Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wxk4p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T14:38:44.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microevolution in Relation to Macroevolution - Macroevolution: Pattern and Process. Steven M. Stanley W. H. Freeman and Co.; San Francisco. 1979. xi + 332 pp. $22.50.

Review products

Macroevolution: Pattern and Process. Steven M. Stanley W. H. Freeman and Co.; San Francisco. 1979. xi + 332 pp. $22.50.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Russell Lande
Russell Lande*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Biophysics and Theoretical Biology, The University of Chicago, 920 East 58th Street, Chicagoy Illinois 60637
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Review
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , Spring 1980 , pp. 233 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Alberch, P., Gould, S. J., Oster, G. F., and Wake, D. B. 1979. Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny. Paleobiology. 5:296–317.Google Scholar
Bush, G., Case, S. M., Wilson, A. C., and Patton, J. L. 1977. Rapid speciation and chromosomal evolution in mammals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 74:3942–3946.Google Scholar
Caspari, E. 1952. Pleiotropic gene action. Evolution. 6:1–18.Google Scholar
Cock, A. G. 1966. Genetical aspects of metrical growth and form in animals. Q. Rev. Biol. 41:131–190.Google Scholar
Cock, A. G. 1969. Genetical studies on growth and form in the fowl. Genet. Res. 14:237–247.Google Scholar
Darwin, Ch. 1859. On the Origin of Species. [Facsimile of the 1st ed.] Harvard Univ. Press; Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Darwin, Ch. 1874. The Descent of Man, and Selection in relation to Sex. 2nd ed. John Murray; London.Google Scholar
Davis, D. D. 1964. The giant panda: a morphological study of evolutionary mechanisms. Fieldiana Mem. (Zool.) 3:1–339.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, Th. 1951. Genetics and the Origin of Species. 3rd ed. Columbia Univ. Press; New York.Google Scholar
Ehrman, L. 1972. Genetics and sexual selection. Pp. 105–135. In: Campbell, B., ed. Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man. Aldine; Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N. and Gould, S. J. 1972. Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phylelic gradualism. Pp. 82–115. In: Schopf, T. J. M., ed. Models in Paleobiology. Freeman, Cooper and Co.; San Francisco, Calif.Google Scholar
Endler, J. A. 1977. Geographic Variation, Speciation and Clines. Princeton Univ. Press; Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. 1960. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Robert MacLehose and Co.; Glasgow.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. 1st ed. Oxford Univ. Press; Oxford.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. 1958. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. 2nd ed. Dover; New York.Google Scholar
Ford, E. B. 1975. Ecological Genetics. 4th ed. Wiley; New York. Frazetta, T. H. 1970. From hopeful monster to bolyerine snakes? Am. Nat. 104:55–72.Google Scholar
Gillespie, J. H. and Ricklefs, R. E. 1979. A note on the estimation of species duration distributions. Paleobiology. 5:60–62.Google Scholar
Gingerich, P. D. 1977. Patterns of evolution in the mammalian fossil record. Pp. 469–500. In: Hallam, A., ed. Patterns of Evolution, As Illustrated by the Fossil Record. Elsevier; Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gingerich, P. D. 1978. Evolutionary transition from ammonite Subprionocyclus to Reesidites—punctuated or gradual? Evolution. 32:454–456.Google Scholar
Gish, D. 1973. Evolution. The Fossils Say No! Creation-Life Publ.; San Diego, Calif.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1977a. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Harvard Univ. Press; Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1977b. The return of hopeful monsters. Nat. Hist. 86:22–30.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. and Eldredge, N. 1977. Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology. 3:115–151.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, R. 1940. The Material Basis of Evolution. Yale Univ. Press; New Haven, Conn.Google Scholar
Green, E. L. 1962. Quantitative genetics of skeletal variations in the mouse. II. Crosses between four inbred strains. Genetics. 47:1085–1096.Google Scholar
Grüneberg, H. 1963. The Pathology of Development. Blackwell Sci. Publ.; Oxford.Google Scholar
Kidwell, J. F., Gregory, P. W., and Guilbert, H. R. 1952. A genetic investigation of allometric growth in Hereford cattle. Genetics. 37:158–173.Google Scholar
Kidwell, J. F. and Williams, E. 1956. Allometric growth of the Dark Cornish fowl. Growth. 20:275–293.Google Scholar
Lande, R. 1976a. Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution. 30:314–334.Google Scholar
Lande, R. 1976b. The maintenance of genetic variability by mutation in a polygenic character with linked loci. Genet. Res. 26:221–235.Google Scholar
Lande, R. 1978. Evolutionary mechanisms of limb loss in tetrapods. Evolution. 32:73–92.Google Scholar
Lande, R. 1979a. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain:body size allometry. Evolution. 33:402–416.Google Scholar
Lande, R. 1979b. Effective deme sizes during long-term evolution estimated from rates of chromosomal rearrangement. Evolution. 33:234–251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lande, R. 1980. Genetic variation and phenotypic evolution during allopatric speciation. Am. Nat. (In press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leigh, E. G. Jr. 1978. How does selection reconcile individual advantage with the good of the group? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 74:4542–4546.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. 1970. The units of selection. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1:1–18.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1954. Change of genetic environment and evolution. Pp. 157–180. In: Huxley, J., Hardy, A. C., and Ford, E. B., eds. Evolution as a Process. Allen and Unwin; London.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1959. The emergence of evolutionary novelties. Pp. 349–380. In: Tax, S., ed. Evolution after Darwin. Vol. 1. Univ. Chicago Press; Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Harvard Univ. Press; Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1975. Taxonomic survivorship curves and Van Valen's law. Paleobiology. 1:82–96.Google Scholar
Ricklefs, R. E. 1978. Paleontologists confronting macroevolution. Science. 199:58–60.Google Scholar
Rensch, B. 1959. Evolution above the Species Level. Columbia Univ. Press; New York.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1953. The Major Features of Evolution. Columbia Univ. Press; New York.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1975. A theory of evolution above the species level. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 72:646–650.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W. and Campbell, C. A. 1975. Genetic regulation and the fossil record. Am. Sci. 63:673–680.Google Scholar
Van Valen, L. 1973. A new evolutionary law. Evol. Theory. 1:1–30.Google Scholar
Van Valen, L. 1979. Taxonomic survivorship curves. Evol. Theory. 4:129–142.Google Scholar
Wade, M. J. 1978. A critical review of the models of group selection. Q. Rev. Biol. 53:101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M. J. D. 1973. Animal Cytology and Evolution. Cambridge Univ. Press; Cambridge.Google Scholar
White, M. J. D. 1978. Modes of Speciation. Freeman; San Francisco, Calif.Google Scholar
Wilkins, H. 1971. Genetic interpretation of regressive evolutionary processes: studies on hybrid eyes of two Astyanax cave populations (Characidae, Pices). Evolution. 25:530–544.Google Scholar
Williams, G. C. 1966. Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton Univ. Press; Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. C., Sarich, V. M., and Maxson, L. R. 1974. The importance of gene rearrangement in evolution: evidence from studies on rates of chromosomal, protein, and anatomical evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 71:3028–3030.Google Scholar
Wright, S. 1934. The results of crosses between inbred strains of guinea pigs, differing in number of digits. Genetics. 19:537–551.Google Scholar
Wright, S. 1940. Breeding structure of populations in relation to speciation. Am. Nat. 74:232–248.Google Scholar
Wright, S. 1967. Comments on the preliminary working papers of Eden and Waddington. Pp. 117–120 In: Moorhead, P. S. and Kaplan, M. M., eds. Mathematical Challenges to the Neo-Darwinian Interpretation of Evolution. Wistar Inst. Press; Philadelphia, Pa.Google Scholar
Wright, S. 1968. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. Vol. 1. Genetic and Biometric Foundations. Univ. Chicago Press; Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
Wright, S. 1977. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. Vol. 3. Experimental Results and Evolutionary Deductions. Univ. Chicago Press; Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
Wright, S. 1978. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. Vol. 4. Variability within and among Natural Populations. Univ. Chicago Press; Chicgo, Ill.Google Scholar
Lande, Russell Google Scholar