Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T19:56:37.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Natural selection in a Cretaceous oyster

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Melvin Sambol
Affiliation:
Newtown High School, Elmhurst, New York 11373
Robert M. Finks
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Queens College (CUNY), Flushing, New York 11367

Abstract

A population of shells of the Cretaceous oyster Agerostrea mesenterica was obtained from a single locality. The age at death for each shell could be determined, and the population was deemed to be essentially undisturbed and capable of providing a mortality record of the local population averaged over a span of time. We measured four morphometric characters which, on the basis of a functional morphologic model, could be expected to have adaptive value. The frequency distribution of each character was analyzed separately for the three year old and for the six year and older specimens in order to determine which individuals died young and which survived to old age. Ontogenetic effects were separated from those of differential mortality by independent means. The results indicated that there was (1) directed selection for maximum curvature, (2) centripetal selection for a plica number of about 8, and (3) a net centripetal effect on both arc length and plica height, composed of selection against largest values coupled with a possible selection against smaller values that cannot be separated from ontogenetic effects. Only the selection for maximum curvature and optimal plica number can be reconciled with the predictions of the model.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Berner, R. A. 1971. Principles of Chemical Sedimentology. 240 pp. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Carter, R. M. 1968. Functional studies on the Cretaceous oyster Arctostrea. Paleontology. 11:458485.Google Scholar
Dice, L. R. and Leraas, H. J. 1936. A graph method for comparing several sets of measurements. Contributions from the Laboratory of Vertebrate Genetics, University of Michigan. 3:13.Google Scholar
Dorf, Erling and Fox, S. K. 1957. Cretaceous and Cenozoic of the New Jersey Coastal Plain. In: Dorf, Erling, ed. Guidebook for Field Trips Atlantic City Meeting 1957. Geol. Soc. Am. Ann. Meet. (Guidebook Series) pp. 130.Google Scholar
Eldredge, Niles. 1971. The allopatric model and phylogeny in Paleozoic invertebrates. Evolution. 25:156167.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N. and Gould, S. J. 1972. Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. pp. 82115. In: Schopf, T. J. M., ed. Models in Paleobiology. Freeman, Cooper and Co.; San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
Finks, R. M. 1971. A new Permian eutaxicladine demosponge, mosiac evolution, and the origin of the Dicranocladina. J. Paleontol. 45:977997.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. and Eldredge, Niles. 1971. Speciation and punctuated equilibria; an alternative to phyletic gradualism. Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. with Programs. 3:no. 7, p. 584585.Google Scholar
Grant, P. R. 1972. Centripetal Selection and the House Sparrow. Syst. Zool. 21:2330.Google Scholar
Hallam, Anthony. 1966. Depositional environment of British Liassic ironstones considered in the context of their facies relationships. Nature, London. 209:13061307.Google Scholar
Hallam, Anthony. 1967. The interpretation of size-frequency distribution in molluscan death assemblages. Palaeontology 10:2542.Google Scholar
Kurtén, Bjorn. 1954. Population dynamics—A new method in paleontology. J. Paleont. 28:286292.Google Scholar
Kurtén, Bjorn. 1958. Life and death of a Pleistocene cave bear, a study in paleoecology. Acta Zool. Fennica. 95:159.Google Scholar
Kurtén, Bjorn. 1964. Population structure in paleoecology. pp. 91106. In: Imbrie, John and Newell, N. D., eds. Approaches to Paleoecology. Wiley; New York.Google Scholar
Pianka, E. R. 1970. On r- and K-selection. Am. Nat. 104:592597.Google Scholar
Reyment, R. A. 1971. Introduction to Quantitative Paleoecology. 226 pp. Elsevier; New York.Google Scholar
Richards, H. G. et al. 1958. Cretaceous fossils. Part I. New Jersey, Geol. Surv. Bull. 61.Google Scholar
Richards, H. G. 1962. Cretaceous fossils. Part II. New Jersey Geol. Surv. Bull. 61.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S. 1964. The function of zigzag deflexions in the commissures of fossil brachiopods. Palaeontology. 7:135171.Google Scholar
Sambol, M. and Finks, R. M. 1974. Measurement of selection pressure in a Cretaceous oyster. Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. with Programs. 6:no. 7, p. 938.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G., Roe, A., and Lewontin, R. C. 1960. Quantitative Zoology. Rev. ed.440 pp. Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc.; New York.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. 1967. Statistical Methods. 6th ed.xiv + 593 pp. Iowa State Press; Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
Stenzel, H. B. 1971. Oysters. pp. N953N1224. In: Moore, R. C., ed. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part N 3, Mollusca 6, Bivalvia. Univ. of Kans. Press; Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
Van Valen, L. 1969. Variation genetics of extinct animals. Am. Nat. 103:193224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldon, W. F. R. 1901. A first study of natural selection in Clausilia laminata (Montagu). Biometrika. 1:107124.Google Scholar