Skip to main content Accessibility help

On a conservative Bayesian method of inferring extinction

  • John Alroy (a1)

Few methods exist that put a posterior probability on the hypothesis that a thing is gone forever given its sighting history. A recently proposed Bayesian method is highly accurate but aggressive, generating many near-zero or near-one probabilities of extinction. Here I explore a Bayesian method called the agnostic equation that makes radically different assumptions and is much more conservative. The method assumes that the overall prior probability of extinction is 50% and that slices of the prior are exponentially distributed across the time series. The conditional probability of the data given survival is based on a simple, long-known combinatorial expression that captures the chance all presences would fall at random before or within the last sighting’s interval (L) given that they could fall anywhere. The same equation is used to compute the conditional probability given extinction at the start of each interval i, that is, the chance that all sightings would fall before or within L given that none could equal or postdate i. The conditional probability is zero for all hypothesized extinction intervals through L. Bayes’s theorem is then used to compute the posterior extinction probability. It is noted that recycling the mean posterior for a population as a prior improves the method’s accuracy. The agnostic equation differs from an earlier, related one, because it explicitly includes a term to represent the hypothesis of survival, and it therefore does not assume that the species has necessarily gone extinct within the sampling window. Simulations demonstrate that the posterior extinction probabilities are highly accurate when considered as a suite but individually indecisive, rarely approaching one. This property is advantageous whenever inferring extinction would have dangerous consequences. The agnostic method is therefore advocated in cases where conservative estimates are desired.

Hide All
Alroy, J. 2014. A simple Bayesian method of inferring extinction. Paleobiology 40:584607.
Alroy, J. 2015. Current extinction rates of reptiles and amphibians. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 112:1300313008.
Alroy, J. 2016. A simple Bayesian method of inferring extinction: reply. Ecology (in press).
Bradshaw, C. J. A., Cooper, A., Turney, C. S. M., and Brook, B. W.. 2012. Robust estimates of extinction time in the geological record. Quaternary Science Reviews 33:1419.
Burgman, M. A., Grimson, R. C., and Ferson, S.. 1995. Inferring threat from scientific collections. Conservation Biology 9:923928.
Caley, P., and Barry, S. C.. 2014. Quantifying extinction probabilities from sighting records: inference and uncertainties. PLoS ONE 9:e95857.
Collen, B., Purvis, A., and Mace, G. M.. 2010. When is a species really extinct? Testing extinction inference from a sighting record to inform conservation assessment. Diversity and Distributions 16:755764.
Goodman, L. A. 1952. Serial number analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 47:622634.
Höhle, M., and Held, L.. 2006. Bayesian estimation of the size of a population. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Institut für Statistik Sonderforschungsbereich 386:112.
Marshall, C. R. 1999. Fossil gap analysis supports early Tertiary origin of trophically diverse avian orders: comment. Geology, 2795.
Marshall, C. R. 2010. Using confidence intervals to quantify the uncertainty in the end-points of stratigraphic ranges. Paleontological Society Papers 16:291316.
Marshall, C. R., and Ward, P. D.. 1996. Sudden and gradual molluscan extinctions in the latest Cretaceous of western European Tethys. Science 274:13601363.
Rivadeneira, M. M., Hunt, G., and Roy, K.. 2009. The use of sighting records to infer species extinction: an evaluation of different methods. Ecology 90:12911300.
Roberts, D. L., and Solow, A. R.. 2003. Flightless birds: when did the dodo become extinct? Nature 426:245.
Solow, A. 2016. A simple Bayesian method for inferring extinction: comment. Ecology (in press). doi:10.1890/15-0336.1.
Strauss, D., and Sadler, P. M.. 1989. Classical confidence intervals and Bayesian probability estimates for ends of local taxon ranges. Mathematical Geology 21:411427.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0094-8373
  • EISSN: 1938-5331
  • URL: /core/journals/paleobiology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed