Skip to main content Accessibility help

On the probability of ancestors in the fossil record

  • Mike Foote (a1)


Three homogeneous models of species origination and extinction are used to assess the probability that ancestor-descendant pairs are preserved in the fossil record. In the model of cladogenetic budding, a species can persist after it branches and can therefore have multiple direct descendants. In the bifurcation model, a species branches to give rise to two distinct direct descendants, itself terminating in the process. In the model of phyletic transformation, a species gives rise to a single direct descendant without branching, itself terminating in the process. Assuming homogeneous preservation, even under pessimistic assumptions regarding the completeness of the fossil record, the probability of finding fossil ancestor-descendant pairs is not negligible. Even if all species of Phanerozoic marine invertebrates in the paleontologically important taxa had the same probability of preservation, on the order of 1%-10% or more of the known fossil species would be directly ancestral to other known fossil species. However, this is likely to be an underestimate, since the probability of finding ancestor-descendant pairs is enhanced by taxonomic, temporal, and spatial heterogeneities in preservation probability. Moreover, indirect genealogical relationships substantially increase the probability of finding ancestor-descendant pairs. The model of budding, the only one in which an ancestor can persist after a branching event, predicts that half or more of extant species have ancestors that are also extant. Thus, the question of how to recognize ancestor-descendant pairs must be carefully considered.



Hide All
Alroy, J. 1994. Quantitative mammalian biochronology and biogeography of North America. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago.
Alroy, J. 1995. Continuous track analysis: a new phylogenetic and biogeographic method. Systematic Biology 44:152178.
Bambach, R. K. 1977. Species richness in marine benthic habitats through the Phanerozoic. Paleobiology 3:152167.
Durham, J. W. 1967. The incompleteness of our knowledge of the fossil record. Journal of Paleontology 41:559565.
Eldredge, N., and Cracraft, J. 1980. Phylogenetic patterns and the evolutionary process. Columbia University Press, New York.
Engelmann, G. F., and Wiley, E. O. 1977. The place of ancestor-descendant relationships in phylogeny. Systematic Zoology 26:111.
Feller, W. 1968. An introduction to probability theory and its applications, Vol. I, 3d ed.Wiley, New York.
Fisher, D. C. 1994. Stratocladistics: morphological and temporal patterns and their relation to phylogenetic process. pp. 133171In Grande, L. and Rieppel, O., eds. Interpreting the hierarchy of nature: from systematic patterns to evolutionary process theories. Academic Press, San Diego.
Foote, M. 1988. Survivorship analysis of Cambrian and Ordovician trilobites. Paleobiology 14:258271.
Foote, M., and Raup, D. M. 1996. Fossil preservation and the stratigraphic ranges of taxa. Paleobiology 22:121140.
Fortey, R. A., and Jefferies, R. P. S. 1982. Fossils and phylogeny—a compromise approach. pp. 197234In Joysey, K. A. and Friday, A. E., eds. Problems of phylogenetic reconstruction (Systematics Association Special Volume No. 21). Academic Press, London.
Gingerich, P. D. 1979. Stratophenetic approach to phylogeny reconstruction in vertebrate paleontology. pp. 4177In Cracraft, J. and Eldredge, N., eds. Phylogenetic analysis and paleontology. Columbia University Press, New York.
Gould, S. J., and Eldredge, N. 1993. Punctuated equilibrium comes of age. Nature 366:223227.
Hallam, A. 1976. Stratigraphic distribution and ecology of European Jurassic bivalves. Lethaia 9:245259.
Hennig, W. 1966. Phylogenetic systematics [transl. Davis, D. D. and Zangerl, R.]. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
Huelsenbeck, J. P. 1994. Comparing the stratigraphic record to estimates of phylogeny. Paleobiology 20:470483.
Hull, D. L. 1979. The limits of cladism. Systematic Zoology 28:416440.
Kendall, D. G. 1948. On the generalized “birth-and-death” process. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 19:115.
May, R. M. 1994. Biological diversity: differences between land and sea. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B 343:105111.
Newell, N. D. 1959. Adequacy of the fossil record. Journal of Paleontology 33:488499.
Patzkowsky, M. E. 1995. A hierarchical branching model of evolutionary radiations. Paleobiology 21:440460.
Paul, C. R. C. 1992. The recognition of ancestors. Historical Biology 6:239250.
Pease, C. M. 1987. Lyellian curves and mean taxonomic durations. Paleobiology 13:484487.
Raup, D. M. 1978. Cohort analysis of generic survivorship. Paleobiology 4:115.
Raup, D. M. 1985. Mathematical models of cladogenesis. Paleobiology 11:4252.
Raup, D. M. 1991. A kill curve for Phanerozoic marine species. Paleobiology 17:3748.
Raup, D. M., and Stanley, S. M. 1978. Principles of paleontology, 2d ed.W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
Schoch, R. M. 1986. Phylogeny reconstruction in paleontology. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Schopf, T. J. M. 1978. Fossilization potential of an intertidal fauna: Friday Harbor, Washington. Paleobiology 3:261271.
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., Bambach, R. K., Raup, D. M., and Valentine, J. W. 1981. Phanerozoic marine diversity and the fossil record. Nature 293:435437.
Simpson, G. G. 1952. How many species? Evolution 6:342.
Smith, A. B. 1994. Systematics and the fossil record: documenting evolutionary patterns. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.
Stitt, J. H. 1977. Late Cambrian and earliest Ordovician trilobites, Wichita Mountains Area, Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin 124:179.
Valentine, J. W. 1970. How many marine invertebrate fossil species? A new approximation. Journal of Paleontology 44:410415.
Valentine, J. W. 1986. Fossil record of the origin of Baupläne and its implications. pp. 209222In Raup, D. M. and Jablonski, D., eds. Patterns and processes in the history of life. Springer, Berlin.
Valentine, J. W. 1989. How good was the fossil record? Clues from the Californian Pleistocene. Paleobiology 15:8394.
Wagner, P. J., and Erwin, D. H. 1995. Phylogenetic patterns as tests of speciation models. pp. 87122In Erwin, D. H. and Anstey, R. L., eds. New approaches to studying speciation in the fossil record. Columbia University Press, New York.

On the probability of ancestors in the fossil record

  • Mike Foote (a1)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed