Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T11:07:21.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Pervasive Biological Explanation - Biotic Interactions in Recent and Fossil Benthic Communities.Michael J. S. Tevesz and Peter L. McCall, editors. Plenum Publishing Co.; New York. 1983. xxi + 800 pp. $95.00.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Charles H. Peterson
Charles H. Peterson*
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Institute of Marine Sciences, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , Fall 1983 , pp. 429 - 436
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Connell, J. H. 1961. The influence of interspecific competition and other factors on the distribution of the barnacle Chthamalus stellatus. Ecology. 42:710–723.Google Scholar
Connell, J. H. 1980. Diversity and the coevolution of competitors, or the ghost of competition past. Oikos. 35:131–138.Google Scholar
Connell, J. H. and Sousa, W. P. 1983. On the evidence needed to judge ecological stability or persistence. Am. Nat. 121:789–824.Google Scholar
Creese, R. G. and Underwood, A. J. 1982. Analysis of inter- and intraspecific competition amongst intertidal limpets with different methods of feeding. Oecologia. 53:337–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dayton, P. K. and Oliver, J. S. 1980. An evaluation of experimental analyses of population and community patterns in benthic marine environments. Pp. 93–120. In: Tenore, K. R. and Coull, B. C., eds. Marine Benthic Dynamics. Univ. South Carolina Press; Columbia.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. and Lutz, R. A. 1983. Larval ecology of marine benthic invertebrates: paleobiological implications. Biol. Rev. 58:21–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2d rev. ed. 172 pp. Univ. Chicago Press; Chicago.Google Scholar
Levinton, J. S. 1977. Ecology of shallow water deposit-feeding communities, Quisset Harbor, Massachusetts. Pp. 191–227. In: Coull, B. C., ed. Ecology of Marine Benthos. Univ. South Carolina Press; Columbia.Google Scholar
Paine, R. T. 1966. Food web complexity and species diversity. Am. Nat. 100:65–75.Google Scholar
Peterson, C. H. 1977. Competitive organization of the soft-bottom macrobenthic communities of southern California lagoons. Mar. Biol. 43:343–359.Google Scholar
Peterson, C. H. 1979. Predation, competitive exclusion, and diversity in the soft-sediment benthic communities of estuaries and lagoons. Pp. 223–264. In: Livingston, R. J., ed. Ecological Processes in Coastal and Marine Systems. Plenum Press; New York.Google Scholar
Peterson, C. H. 1982. The importance of predation and intra- and interspecific competition in the population biology of two infaunal suspension-feeding bivalves, Protothaca staminea and Chione undatella. Ecol. Monogr. 52:437–475.Google Scholar
Peterson, C. H. 1983. Interactions between two infaunal bivalves, Chione undatella (Sowerby) and Protothaca statninea (Conrad), and two potential enemies, Crepidula onyx Sowerby and Cancer anthonyi (Rathbun). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 68:145–158.Google Scholar
Peterson, C. H. and Quammen, M. L. 1982. Siphon nipping: its importance to small fishes and its impact on growth of the bivalve Protothaca staminea (Conrad). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 63:249–268.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. 1963. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowlege. 412 pp. Morrow; New York.Google Scholar
Rhoads, D. C. and Lutz, R. A. 1980. Skeletal Growth of Aquatic Organisms. 764 pp. Plenum; New York.Google Scholar
Rhoads, D. C. and Young, D. K. 1970. The influence of deposit-feeding organisms on sediment stability and community trophic structure. J. Mar. Res. 28:150–178.Google Scholar
Schoener, T. W. 1982. The controversy over interspecific competition. Am. Sci. 70:586–595.Google Scholar
Sousa, W. P. 1979. Disturbance in marine intertidal boulder fields: the nonequilibrium maintenance of species diversity. Ecology. 60:1225–1239.Google Scholar
Strathmann, R. R. 1980. Why does a larva swim so long? Paleobiology. 6:373–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thistle, D. 1981. Natural physical disturbances and communities of marine soft bottoms. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 6:223–228.Google Scholar
Underwood, A. J. and Denley, E. J. 1983. Paradigms, explanations and generalizations in models for the structure of intertidal communities on rocky shores. In: Simberloff, D. and Strong, D. R. Jr., eds. Ecological Communities: Conceptual Issues and the Evidence. Princeton Univ. Press; Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Van Blaricom, G. R. 1982. Experimental analyses of structural regulation in a marine sand community exposed to oceanic swell. Ecol. Monogr. 52:283–305.Google Scholar
Virnstein, R. W. 1977. The importance of predation by crabs and fishes on benthic infauna in Chesapeake Bay. Ecology. 58:1199–1217.Google Scholar
Wethey, D. S. 1983. Intrapopulation variation in growth of sessile organisms: natural populations of the intertidal barnacle Balanus balanoides. Oikos. 40:14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodin, S. A. 1974. Polychaete abundance patterns in a marine soft-sediment environment: the importance of biological interactions. Ecol. Monogr. 44:171–187.Google Scholar
Woodin, S. A. 1978. Refuges, disturbance, and community structure: a marine soft-bottom example. Ecology. 59:274–284.Google Scholar
Woodin, S. A. 1982. Browsing: Important in marine sedimentary environments? Spionid polychaete examples. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 60:35–45.Google Scholar