Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-2pp2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T20:23:32.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prey Selection by naticid gastropods: experimental tests and application to the fossil record

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Jennifer A. Kitchell ,
Christofer H. Boggs ,
James F. Kitchell  and
James A. Rice
Jennifer A. Kitchell
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Christofer H. Boggs
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
James F. Kitchell
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
James A. Rice
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Because predation by drilling gastropods is uniquely preservable in the fossil record, it represents important evidence for the study of coevolution. Previous studies of drilling gastropod predation have been largely descriptive and sometimes contradictory. We formulate and test a model of prey selection by naticid drilling gastropods. The model adequately predicts both prey species selection and prey size selection. Prey preferences parallel prey profitabilities, determined by calculating prey species-specific and predator size-specific cost-benefit functions. The model also specifically suggests the evolution of potential refugia from predation and the evolution of potential predatory attributes. Application of the model to several Miocene and Pliocene assemblages studied by Thomas (1976) corroborates the feasibility and utility of this approach in examining the evolutionary record of naticid predation, which extends from the Late Mesozoic. Apparent evolutionary stasis and convergent morphological trends among prey species may be consistent with continuous selection pressures against predation.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , Fall 1981 , pp. 533 - 552
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Adegoke, O. S. and Tevesz, M. J. S. 1974. Gastropod predation patterns in the Eocene of Nigeria. Lethaia. 7:17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, A. D. 1960. Observations on predation of Venus striatula (da Costa) by Natica alderi (Forbes). Proc. Malacol. Soc. London. 34:157–164.Google Scholar
Ansell, A. D. 1969. Defensive adaptations to predation in the Mollusca. Proc. Symp. Mollusca. 2:487–512.Google Scholar
Bayne, B. L. and Scullard, C. 1978a. Rates of oxygen consumption by Thais (Nucella) lapillus (L.) J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 32:97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayne, B. L. and Scullard, C. 1978b. Rates of feeding by Thais (Nucella) lapillus (L.) J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 32:113–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, C. J. Jr. 1976. Ontogeny of predatory behavior in marine snails (Prosobranchia: Naticidae). The Nautilus. 90:1–4.Google Scholar
Berg, C. J. Jr. 1978. Development and evolution of behavior in molluscs, with emphasis on changes in stereotypy. Pp. 3–17. In: Burghardt, G. M. and Bekoff, M., eds. The Development of Behavior: Comparative and Evolutionary Aspects. Garland STPM Press; New York.Google Scholar
Berg, C. J. Jr. and Nishenko, L. 1975. Stereotypy of predatory boring behavior of Pleistocene naticid gastropods. Paleobiology. 1:258–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, C. J. Jr. and Porter, M. E. 1974. A comparison of predatory behavior among the naticid gastropods Lunatia heros, Lunatia triseriata and Polinices duplicatus. Biol. Bull. 147:469–470.Google Scholar
Boekschoten, G. J. 1967. Palaeoecology of some mollusca from the Tielrode sands (Pliocene, Belgium). Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeocol. 3:311–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carriker, M. R. 1951. Observations on the penetration of tightly closing bivalves by Busycon and other predators. Ecology. 32:73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carriker, M. R. and Van Zandt, D. 1972. Predatory behavior of a shell-boring muricid gastropod. Pp. 157–244. In: Winn, H. E. and Olla, B. L., eds. Behavior of Marine Animals, Vol. 1. Plenum Press; New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carriker, M. R. and Yochelson, E. L. 1968. Recent gastropod boreholes and Ordovician cylindrical borings. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper. 593-B.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, R. M. 1968. On the biology and paleontology of some predators of bivalved Mollusca. Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol. 4:29–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charnov, E. L. 1976. Optimal foraging: attack strategy of a mantid. Am. Nat. 110:141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, W. C. 1958. Escape responses of herbivorous gastropods. Nature. 181:137–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comins, H. N. and Hassell, M. P. 1976. Predation in multiprey communities. J. Theor. Biol. 62:93–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cornell, H. 1976. Search strategies and the adaptive significance of switching in some general predators. Am. Nat. 110:317–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowie, R. J. 1977. Optimal foraging in great tits (Parus major). Nature. 268:137–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, R. and Krebs, J. R. 1979. Arms races between and within species. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 205:480–511.Google ScholarPubMed
DeBenedictis, P. A., Gill, F. B., Hainsworth, F. R., Pyke, G. H., and Wolf, L. L. 1978. Optimal meal size in hummingbirds. Am. Nat. 112:301–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudley, E. C. and Dudley, EC. 1980. Drilling predation on some Miocene marine mollusks. The Nautilus. 94:63–66.Google Scholar
Dudley, E. C. and Vermeij, G. J. 1978. Predation in time and space: Drilling in the gastropod Turritella. Paleobiology. 4:436–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, D. C. 1974. Preferred prey of Polinices duplicatus in Cape Cod inlets. Bull. Am. Malacol. Union. 40:17–20.Google Scholar
Edwards, D. C. and Huebner, J. D. 1977. Feeding and growth rates of Polinices duplicatus preying on Mya arenaria at Barnstable Harbor, Massachusetts. Ecology. 58:1218–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, P. R. and Raven, P. H. 1964. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution. 18:586–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elner, R. W. and Hughes, R. N. 1978. Energy maximization in the diet of the shore crab, Carcinus maenas. J. Anim. Ecol. 47:103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elner, R. W. and Raffaelli, D. G. 1980. Interactions between two marine snails, Littorina rudis Maton and Littorina nigrolineata Gray, a predator, Carcinus maenas (L.), and a parasite, Microphallus similis Jagerskiold. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 43:151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, C. J. 1965. The use of beached valves of the lamellibranch molluscs Glycimeris glycimeris (L.), Donax semistriatus Poli and Donax trunculus L. for the determination of percentage mortality by Natica spp. Doriana. 4:1–8.Google Scholar
Gonor, J. J. 1965. Predator-prey reactions between two marine prosobranch gastropods. Veliger. 7:228–232.Google Scholar
Goss-Custard, J. D. 1977. Optimal foraging and the size selection of worms by redshank Tringa totanus. Anim. Behav. 25:10–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J. and Lewontin, R. C. 1979. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 205:581–598.Google Scholar
Griffiths, D. 1980a. Foraging costs and relative prey size. Am. Nat. 116:743–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, D. 1980b. The feeding biology of ant-lion larvae: prey capture, handling and utilization. J. Anim. Ecol. 49:99–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbert, C. J. 1977. Growth and survivorship in a tidal-flat population of the bivalve Mercenaria mercenaria from Southhampton Water. Mar. Biol. 44:71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, A., Pisera, A., and Ryszkiewicz, M. 1974. Predation by muricid and naticid gastropods on the Lower Tortonian mollusks from the Korytnica clays. Acta. Geol. Polonica. 24:249–260.Google Scholar
Hoffman, D. L. and Weldon, P. J. 1977. Flight responses of two intertidal gastropods to sympatric predatory gastropods from Barbados. Veliger. 20:361–366.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. N. 1979. Optimal diets under the energy maximization premise: the effects of recognition of time and learning. Am. Nat. 113:209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R. N. and Elner, R. W. 1979. Tactics of a predator, Carcinus maenas, and morphological responses of the prey, Nucella lapillus. J. Anim. Ecol. 48:65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huston, M. 1979. A general hypothesis of species diversity. Am. Nat. 113:81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kojumdjieva, E. 1974. Les gasteropodes perceurs et leurs victimes du Miocene de Bulgarie du nord-ouest. Bulg. Acad. Sci. Bull. Geol. Inst. (ser. Palentol.). 25:5–24.Google Scholar
Krebs, J. 1977. Optimal foraging: theory and experiment. Nature. 268:583–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, J. R. 1978. Optimal foraging: decision rules for predators. Pp. 23–63. In: Krebs, J. R. and Davies, N. B., eds. Behavioral Ecology. Sinauer Assoc., Inc.; Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Laws, H. M. and Laws, D. F. 1972. The escape reaction of Donacilla angusta Reeve (Mollusca: Bivalvia) in the presence of a naticid predator. Veliger. 14:289–290.Google Scholar
Levandowsky, M. 1976. The cats in Zanzibar. Q. Rev. Biol. 51:417–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. 1974. Models in Ecology. Cambridge at the University Press; Cambridge.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. 1978. Optimization theory in evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 9:31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, R. P. 1980. The background and some current problems of theoretical ecology. Synthese. 43:195–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medcof, J. C. and Thurber, L. W. 1958. Trial control of the greater clam drill (Lunatia heros) by manual collection. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 15:1355–1369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menge, J. L. 1974. Prey selection and foraging period of the predaceous rocky intertidal snail, Acanthina punctulata. Oecologia. 17:293–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, H. B. and Lopez, N. N. 1969. The ecology of Chione cancellata. Bull. Mar. Sci. 19:131–148.Google Scholar
Murdoch, W. W. and Oaten, A. 1975. Predation and population stability. Adv. Ecol. Res. 9:1–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negus, M. 1975. An analysis of boreholes drilled by Natica catena (Da Costa) in the valves of Donax vittatus (Da Costa). Proc. Malacol. Soc. London. 41:353–356.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D. and Boyd, D. W. 1978. A palaeontologist's view of bivalve phylogeny. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 284:203–215.Google Scholar
Oster, G. F. and Wilson, E. O. 1978. Caste and ecology in the social insects. Monogr. Pop. Biol., No. 12. Princeton Univ. Press; Princeton.Google Scholar
Paine, R. T. 1963. Trophic relationships of 8 sympatric predatory gastropods. Ecology. 44:63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paine, R. T. 1966. Food web complexity and species diversity. Am. Nat. 100:65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paine, R. T. 1976. Size-limited predation: an observational and experimental approach with the Mytilus-Pisaster interaction. Ecology. 57:858–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyke, G. H., Pulliam, H. R., and Charnov, E. L. 1977. Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests. Q. Rev. Biol. 52:137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapport, D. J. 1980. Optimal foraging for complementary resources. Am. Nat. 116:324–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyment, R. A. 1966. Preliminary observations on gastropod predation in the western Niger delta. Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol. 6:45–59.Google Scholar
Reyment, R. A. 1967. Paleoethology and fossil drilling gastropods. Trans. Kans. Sci. 70:33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robba, E. and Ostinelli, F. 1975. Studi paleoecologici sul Pliocene Ligure. I. Testimonianze di predazione sui molluschi Pliocenici di Albenga. Riv. Ital. Paleontol. 81:309–372.Google Scholar
Rosewater, J. 1980. Predator boreholes in Periploma margaritaceum, with a brief survey of other Periplomatidae. Veliger. 22:248–251.Google Scholar
Roughgarden, J. and Feldman, M. 1975. Species packing and predation pressure. Ecology. 46:489–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, W. M. and Rosenzweig, M. L. 1978. Homage to the Red Queen. I. Coevolution of predators and their victims. Theor. Pop. Biol. 14:135–157.Google Scholar
Schall, J. J. and Pianka, E. R. 1980. Evolution of escape behavior diversity. Am. Nat. 115:551–566.Google Scholar
Schoener, T. W. 1971. Theory of feeding strategies. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2:369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1973. Effects of competition on rates of evolution, with special reference to bivalve mollusks and mammals. Syst. Zool. 22:486–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1977. Trends, rates, and patterns of evolution in the Bivalvia. Pp. 209–250. In: Hallam, A., ed. Patterns of Evolution. Elsevier Publ. Co.; Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1979. Macroevolution, Pattern and Process. 332 pp. W.H. Freeman and Co.Google Scholar
Stanton, R. J. Jr. and Nelson, P. C. 1980. Reconstruction of the trophic web in paleontology: community structure in the Stone City Formation (Middle Eocene, Texas). J. Paleontol. 54:118–135.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. D. 1970. Feeding habits of predatory gastropods in a Tertiary (Eocene) molluscan assemblage from the Paris Basin. Palaeontology. 13:254–260.Google Scholar
Thayer, C. W. 1979. Biological bulldozers and the evolution of marine benthic communities. Science. 203:458–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, R. D. K. 1975. Functional morphology, ecology, and evolutionary conservatism in the Glycymerididae (Bivalvia). Palaeontology. 18:217–254.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. D. K. 1976. Gastropod predation on sympatric Neogene species of Glycymeris (Bivalvia) from the eastern United States. J. Paleontol. 50:488–499.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. D. K. 1978. Shell form and the ecological range of living and extinct Arcoida. Paleobiology. 4:181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Valen, L. 1973. A new evolutionary law. Evol. Theory. 1:1–30.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1977. The Mesozoic marine revolution: evidence from snails, predators, and grazers. Paleobiology. 3:245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1978. Biogeography and Adaptation: Patterns of Marine Life. Harvard Univ. Press; Cambridge.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1980. Drilling predation on bivalves in Guam: some paleoecological implications. Malacologia. 19:329–334.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. and Covich, A. P. 1978. Coevolution of freshwater gastropods and their predators. Am. Nat. 112:833–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeij, G. J., Zipser, E., and Dudley, E. C. 1980. Predation in time and space: peeling and drilling in terebrid gastropods. Paleobiology. 6:352–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, E. E. and Hall, D. J. 1974. Optimal foraging and the size selection of prey by the bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Ecology. 55:1042–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiltse, W. I. 1978. Effects of Predation by Polinices duplicatus on Community Structure. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Wiltse, W. I. 1980. Predation by juvenile Polinices duplicatus (Say) on Gemma gemma (Totten). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 42:187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegelmeier, E. 1954. Beobachtungen uber den Nahrungswer-werb bei der Naticidae Lunatia nitida Donovan (Gastropoda Prosobranchia). Helgoland. wiss. Meer. 5:1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zipser, E. and Vermeij, G. J. 1978. Crushing behavior of tropical and temperate crabs. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 31:155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar