Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T22:32:41.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relation of the morphology of stick-like bryozoans at Friday Harbor, Washington, to bottom currents, suspended matter and depth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Thomas J. M. Schopf
Affiliation:
Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, 5734 S. Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637
Kenneth O. Collier
Affiliation:
Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, 5734 S. Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637
Barbara O. Bach
Affiliation:
Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, 5734 S. Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637

Abstract

Stick-like bryozoans from 1 to 5 cm tall, and of varying degrees of colony robustness, are common in deposits from Ordovician through Cenozoic in age; their occurrence has been used to infer strength of bottom currents. Three species which are modern analogues of this mode of growth occur abundantly at subtidal depths near Friday Harbor, Washington; we studied one of these forms, the calcitic cyclostome Heteropora pacifica. Branch diameter was used as an indication of colony robustness because it can be measured in both living and fossil material. Branch diameter decreases significantly with depth (in collections from approximately 9, 15 and 30 m depth) at each of 4 transect localities.

At each locality, currents 6 to 10 cm above the bottom were measured continuously in water depth of ≃ 15 m, for several hours at a time. Under these conditions, the maximum sustained current through the several hour tidal cycle was 70 to 90 cm/sec at one locality, and 20 cm/sec or less at each of the other 3 localities. Suspended matter was determined at heights of 0.2, 0.5 and 1.0 m above the bottom. The amount of suspended matter 0.2 m above the bottom was 40 to 45 mg/cm2/day at the locality with the high current (depth of 15 and 30 m), and usually 5 to 10 mg/cm2/day at the localities with the low current (depth 15 and 30 m). Despite these several fold differences in current strength and suspended matter between localities, for any given depth bryozoan branch diameter does not vary. Branch breaking strength (23 MN/m2) and elastic modulus (30 GN/m2) were measured using small (.16 mm) strain gauges affixed to dry branches of Heteropora. These values are typical of carbonate skeletons of corals. Although Heteropora branch diameter (and colony robustness) decreases significantly with depth, this trend probably is unrelated to current strength.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Alexander, R. M. 1971. Size and Shape. Edward Arnold; London.Google Scholar
Aller, R. C. and Dodge, R. E. 1974. Animal-sediment relations in a tropical lagoon Discovery Bay, Jamaica. J. Mar. Res. 32:209232.Google Scholar
Askren, L. T. Jr. 1968. Bryozoan paleoecology from the Tertiary of Alabama. Southeastern Geol. 9:157163.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S. 1906. The bryozoan fauna of the Rochester Shale. U.S. Geol. Surv. Bull. 292, 137 pp.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. 1911. The Early Paleozoic Bryozoa of the Baltic provinces. U.S. Natl. Mus. Bull. 77. 382 pp.Google Scholar
Caldwell, D. R. and Chriss, T. M. 1979. The viscous sublayer at the sea floor. Science. 205:11311132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chamberlain, J. A. Jr. 1978. Mechanical properties of coral skeleton: compressive strength and its adaptive significance. Paleobiology. 4:419435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheetham, A. H. 1971. Functional morphology and biofacies distribution of cheilostome Bryozoa in the Danian Stage (Paleocene) of southern Scandinavia. Smithsonian Contrib. to Paleobiol. 6:187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DuBois, H. M. 1916. Variation induced in brachiopods by environmental conditions. Publ. Puget Sound Mar. Stn. 1:177183.Google Scholar
Flor, F. D. 1972. Biometrische untersuchungen zur Autökologie ober-Kretazischer Bryozoen. Mitteilungen aus dem Geologisch-Paläontologischen Institut der Universität Hamburg. 41:15128.Google Scholar
Glynn, P. W. 1977. Coral growth in upwelling and nonupwelling areas of the Pacific coast of Panama. J. Mar. Res. 35:567585.Google Scholar
Hadley, M. L. 1964. Wave-induced bottom currents in the Celtic Sea. Mar. Geol. 2:164167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmelin, J.-G. 1973. Morphological variations and ecology of the Recent cyclostome bryozoan Idmonea atlantica from the Mediterranean. pp. 95106. In: Larwood, G. P., ed. Living and Fossil Bryozoa. Academic Press; London.Google Scholar
Harmelin, J.-G. 1976. Le sous-ordre des Tubuliporina (Bryozoaires Cyclostomes) en Méditerranée. Memoires de l'Institut Oceanographique. Fondation Albert Ier, Prince de Monaco. no. 10. 326 pp.Google Scholar
Hillmer, G. 1971. Bryozoen—Tierkolonien im Meer. Mikrokosmos. pp. 6572.Google Scholar
Koehl, M. A. R. 1976. Mechanical design in sea anemones. pp. 2331. In: Mackie, G. O., ed. Coelenterate Ecology and Behavior. Plenum Press; New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koehl, M. A. R. 1977. Effects of sea anemones on the flow forces they encounter. J. Exper. Biol. 69:87105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozloff, E. N. 1974. Seashore life of Puget Sound, the Strait of Georgia, and the San Juan Archipelago. 282 pp. Univ. Washington Press; Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
Kozloff, E. N. 1976. Keys to the marine invertebrates of Puget Sound, the San Juan Archipelago, and adjacent regions. 226 pp. Univ. Washington Press; Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
Laporte, L. F. 1969. Recognition of a transgressive carbonate sequence within an epeiric sea: Helderberg Group (Lower Devonian) of New York State. In: Friedman, G. M., ed. Depositional Environments in Carbonate Rocks. Soc. Econ. Paleontol. Mineral. Spec. Publ. 14:98118.Google Scholar
Laporte, L., Bowen, Z. P., McAlester, A. L., Sutton, R. G., and Beerbower, J. R. 1969. North Am. Paleontol. Conv. Field Trip #5. Devonian Marine Assemblages of New York. Privately printed. 77 pp.Google Scholar
Lesht, B. M. 1979. Relationship between sediment resuspension and the statistical frequency distribution of bottom shear stress. Mar. Geol. 32:M19M27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manheim, F. T., Meade, R. H., and Bond, G. C. 1970. Suspended matter in surface waters of the Atlantic continental margin from Cape Cod to Florida Keys. Science. 167:371376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCall, P. L. 1977. Community patterns and adaptive strategies of the infaunal benthos of Long Island Sound. J. Mar. Res. 35:221266.Google Scholar
Roark, R. J. 1965. Formulas for Stress and Strain. 4th ed.432 pp. McGraw-Hill Co.; New York.Google Scholar
Schopf, T. J. M. 1974. Ectoprocts as associates of coral reefs: St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. Proc. Second Int. Coral Reef Symp. 1:353356.Google Scholar
Schopf, T. J. M. 1978. Fossilization potential of an intertidal fauna: Friday Harbor, Washington. Paleobiology. 4:261270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schopf, T. J. M. 1980. Paleoceanography. 341 pp. Harvard Univ. Press; Cambridge, Massachusetts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schopf, T. J. M. and Manheim, F. T. 1967. Chemical composition of Ectoprocta (Bryozoa). J. Paleontol. 41:11971225.Google Scholar
Shelford, V. E. and Towler, E. D. 1925. Animal communities of the San Juan Channel and adjacent areas. Publ. Puget Sound Biol. Stn. 5:3373.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. 1969. Biometry. 776 pp. W. H. Freeman and Co.; San Francisco.Google Scholar
Stach, L. W. 1936. Correlation of zoarial form with habitat. J. Geol. 44:6065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thayer, C. W. 1977. Recruitment, growth, and mortality of a living articulate brachiopod, with implications for the interpretation of survivorship curves. Paleobiology. 3:98109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, E. 1977. Phenetic variability and functional morphology of erect cheilostome bryozoans from the Danian (Palaeocene) of Denmark. Paleobiology. 3:360376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainwright, S. A., Biggs, W. D., Currey, J. D., and Gosline, J. M. 1976. Mechanical Design in Organisms. 423 pp. Edward Arnold; London.Google Scholar
Winston, J. E. 1977. Feeding in marine bryozoans. pp. 233271. In: Woollacott, R. M. and Zimmer, R. L., eds. Biology of Bryozoans. Academic Press; New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodin, S. A. 1974. Polychaete abundance patterns in a marine soft-sediment environment: the importance of biological interactions. Ecol. Monogr. 44:171187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, D. K. and Rhoads, D. C. 1971. Animal-sediment relations in Cape Cod Bay, Massachusetts. I. A transect study. Mar. Biol. 11:242254.Google Scholar