Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-27T07:38:51.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adonia variegata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) bears maternally inherited Flavobacteria that kill males only

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1999

G. D. D. HURST
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University College London, 4 Stephenson Way, London NW1 2HE, UK Department of Genetics, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EH, UK
C. BANDI
Affiliation:
Istituto di Patologia Generale Veterinaria, Università di Milano, Via Celoria 10, 20133 Milano, Italy
L. SACCHI
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Biologia Animale, Università di Pavia, Piazza Botta 9, 27100 Pavia, Italy
A. G. COCHRANE
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EH, UK
D. BERTRAND
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EH, UK
I. KARACA
Affiliation:
University of Cukurova, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Plant Protection, 01330 Adana, Turkey
M. E. N. MAJERUS
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EH, UK

Abstract

Inherited bacteria that parasitically distort the pattern of sex allocation of their host, biasing allocation towards female progeny, are found in many arthropods. One such manipulation is male-killing, where male progeny of infected females die during embryogenesis. We here provide evidence for a male-killing bacterium in the coccinellid beetle, Adonia variegata. We then address 3 questions. First, is this male-killing bacterium one that is found in other hosts, or does it represent a new transition to male-killing within the eubacteria? Using the sequence of the 16S rDNA of the bacterium, we found that the male-killing bacterium is a member of the Flavobacteria–Bacteroides group, most closely related to the male-killing bacterium in another ladybird beetle, Coleomegilla maculata. Secondly, is there any evidence that this bacterium affects female host physiology? In a paired test under nutritional stress, we found no evidence for a physiological benefit to infection, and weak evidence of a physiological cost, in terms of reduced fecundity. Thirdly, is there any evidence of host involvement in the transmission of the bacterium to the germ line? We found no evidence of host involvement. Rather, bacteria migrated to the ovariole independently of host cells. We conclude that the bacterium is a parasite, and discuss how 2 different species of ladybird come to be infected with 1 lineage of bacterium, and why case studies of male-killing bacteria have generally found little evidence of any symbiont contribution to host physiological functioning.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)