Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T15:19:24.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Occurrence of Oxyuris vermicularis in the Human Vermiform Appendix

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

J. Alexander Innes
Affiliation:
(From the Parasitology Laboratory, University of Aberdeen.)
A. Elmslie Campbell
Affiliation:
(From the Parasitology Laboratory, University of Aberdeen.)

Extract

This investigation was commenced by one of us (J. A. I.) in 1910 and carried on for three and a half years. Our purpose was to determine as accurately as possible the percentage of appendices operated on for appendicitis which contained intestinal parasites. The results of a study of 100 unselected cases are given below.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1914

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashhurst, (1909). Amer. Journ. of Med. Sci. CXXXVIII. 583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bégouin, (1902). Gaz. Hébd. Soc. Méd. de Bourdeaux, XXIII. 363.Google Scholar
Birch-Hirshfeld, (1871). Archiv f. Heilkunde, 191.Google Scholar
Brumpt, (1910). Précis de Parasitologie, 355358.Google Scholar
Burgess, (1912). Brit. Med. Journ. I. 415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clinical Records (1913). Edinburgh Med. Journ. I. 437.Google Scholar
Culhane, (1910). Journ. Amer. Med. Assoc. LIV. 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdmann, (1904). New York Med. Journ. LXXIX. 537.Google Scholar
Galli-Valerio, (1903). Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. XXXIV. 350.Google Scholar
Girard, (1901). Ann. Inst. Pasteur, XV. 440.Google Scholar
Grippen, (1912). Brit. Med. Journ. I. 1072.Google Scholar
Hippius, and Lewinson, (1907). Deutsche med. Wochenschrift. XXXIII. 17801782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoepfl, (1904). Archiv f. klin. Chir. LXXIII 100.Google Scholar
Macdonald, (1912). Brit. Med. Journ. I. 485.Google Scholar
Martin, (1907). Montpel. Méd. XXIV. 531537.Google Scholar
Metchnikoff, (1901). Journ. des Praticiens, XV. 185.Google Scholar
Metchnikoff, (1901). Bull. Acad. Méd. XIV. 301.Google Scholar
Moty Von, (1902). Echo Méd. du Nord, VI. 217.Google Scholar
Moty Von, Quoted in Lancet (1902), II. 1211.Google Scholar
Ney, (1912). Johns Hopkins Hosp. Bull. XXIII. 123.Google Scholar
Pabeuf, and Dubois, (1908). Bull. Méd. XXII. 153.Google Scholar
Patterson, (1906) Amer. Journ. Med. Sci. CXXXI. 859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Railliet, (1911). Compt. rend. Soc. de Biol. LXX. 310.Google Scholar
Romanovitch, (1911). Compt. rend. Soc. de Biol. LXX. 122.Google Scholar
Russell, (1901). Internat. Med. Journ. of Australia, Dec. 1901.Google Scholar
Russell, and Bulkley, (1912). Journ. of Exper. Med. XV. 225.Google Scholar
Schloss, (1910). Amer. Journ. Med. Sci. CXXXIX. 675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprengel, (1906). Deutsche Chir. Stuttgart, S. 182.Google Scholar
Still, (1899). Brit. Med. Journ. L 898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Still, (1909). Common Disorders and Diseases of Childhood, London, 267, 271Google Scholar
Unterberger, (1908). Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. Abt. 1, XLVII. 495.Google Scholar
Wagener, (1906). Virchow's Arch. CLXXXII. 145.Google Scholar
Wakefield, (1908). Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc. L. 1904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walther, (1905). Bull. et Mém. Soc. de Chir. XXXI. 355.Google Scholar
Weinberg, (1907). Ann. Inst. Pasteur, XXI. 417.Google Scholar
Wilson, (1912). Brit. Med. Journ. I. 829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkler, (1910). Die Erkrankungen des Blinddarmenganges, Jena, 234.Google Scholar