Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:23:12.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Revision of the British Leeches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

W. A. Harding
W. A. Harding
Affiliation:
(From the Zoological Laboratory, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since the appearance of Johnston's Catalogue of the British Non-parasitical Worms in the Collection of the British Museum—a work which although not published until 1865 had been completed some ten years earlier and consequently embodies observations made more than half a century ago—the Hirudinea of the British Islands have been largely neglected. Apart from this the interest now being taken in leeches by students of their protozoan parasites and the absence of any recent work upon this group of our fauna seems sufficient apology for the revised descriptive catalogue attempted in the following pages.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , July 1910 , pp. 130 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1910

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Aldrovandus, U. (1638). De Animalibus Insectis. Fol. Bononiae, 1638.Google Scholar
Allen, B. M. (1902). The topography of organs in typical segments of Hirudo. Biol. Bull. Wood's Holl. iii. pp. 161–164, 1 fig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apáthy, S. (1888 a). Analyse der äusseren Körperform der Hirudineen. Mitth. Zool. Sta. Neapel, viii. pp. 153–232, pls. viii and ix.Google Scholar
Apáthy, S. (1888 b). Süsswasser-Hirudineen. Zool. Jahrb. iii. p. 725.Google Scholar
Apáthy, S. (1888 c). Systematische Streiflichter. 1. Marine Hirudineen. Arch. f. Nat. 1888, liv. 1, p. 43.Google Scholar
Apáthy, S. (1889 a). Ueber das Kriechen von Hirudo und Aulastoma. Zool. Jahrb. iv pp. 267, 268.Google Scholar
Apáthy, S. (1889 b). Notiz über die Ringelung von Piscicola. Zool. Anz. No. 323 (1889), p. 649.Google Scholar
Apáthy, S. (1897). Die Beschaffenheit und Funktion der Haldrusen von H. medicinalis, mit Rücksicht auf die klinische Verwendung ihres Sekretes. Sitzungsber. Sieben-burg. Ver., Medicin. Abth. xix. pp. 37–77, pls. iv—vi.Google Scholar
Audouin, V. (1827). Article “Œufs des Annelides” in Dictionnaire Classique d'Histoire Naturelle, par Messieurs Audouin,…Bourbon,…Brongniart, etc. xii. p. 127. 16 vols. 8vo. Paris, 1822—30.Google Scholar
Audouin, V. (1829). Article “Sangsue,” loc. cit. xv. p. 106.Google Scholar
von Baer, K. E. (1827). Beiträge zur Kenntniss der niedern Thiere. Nov. Act. Phys. Med. Acad. C.L.G. Naturae curiosorum, xiii. pars 2.Google Scholar
Baird, W. (1869). Descriptions of some new Suctorial Annelides in…the British Museum. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1869, pp. 310–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakek, H. (1753). Employment for the Microscope. 8vo. London, 1753.Google Scholar
Barbut, J. (1783). The Genera Vermium…Linnaei. 4to. London, 1783.Google Scholar
Baster, J. (1760). Opuscula subseciva, I, lib. 2. 4to. Haarlem, 1760.Google Scholar
Bayer, E. (1898). Hypodermis und neue Hautsinnesorgane der Rhynchobdelliden. Zeitschr. wiss. Zool. lxiv. pp. 648–727, pls. xxiii—xxv, 10 text figs.Google Scholar
van Beneden, P. J., et al. Hesse, C. E. (1863). Recherches sur les Bdellodes ou Hirudinées et les Trématodes marins. Mém. de l'Acad. des Sci. de Belgique, xxxiv. (1863).Google Scholar
Bergh, R. S. (1884). Ueber die Metamorphose von Nephelis. Zeitschr. wiss. Zool. xli. pp. 284–301, pls. xviii and xix.Google Scholar
Bergman, , Torberno, (1757). Afhandling om Iglar. Kongl. Vetenskaps Acad. Handlingar, xviii. (1757), pp. 304–314.Google Scholar
Bertelli, D. (1887). Glandule salivari nella Hirudo medicinalis. Atti Soc. Toscana… in Pisa (Proc. Verb.), v. pp. 284–285.Google Scholar
Bertelli, D. (1896). Ricerche anatomiche sulle glandule perifaringee e sulle glandule labiali della H. medicinalis. Monitore Zool. ital. (Firenze), vii. pp. 147–164, pl. ii.Google Scholar
Bibiena, F. (1791). De hirudine sermones quinque. De Bononiensi scientiarum et artium Instituto atque Academia Commentarii, vii. pp. 55–105. 4to. Bologna.Google Scholar
Biedermann, W. (1891). Ueber den Unsprung und die Endigungsweise der Nerven in den Ganglien wirbelloser Tiere. Zeitschr. f. Naturw. xxv. pp. 429–449 (Hirudo).Google Scholar
Blainville, H. M. D., de, (1827). Article “Sangsue” in Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles, xlvii. Text 60 vols. Atlas 12 vols. 8vo. Strasbourg and Paris, 1816–1830.Google Scholar
Blainville, H. M. D., de, (1828). Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles Article “ Vers,” lvii.Google Scholar
Blanchard, , Emile, (1845). Mémoire sur l'organisation d'un animal appartenant au sous-embranchement des Annelés. Ann. des Sci. Nat. (3), iv. pp. 364–379, pl. xviii.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1892 a). Courtes Notices sur les Hirudinées, iii. Description de la Nephelis atomaria. Bull. Soc. Zool. de France, xvii. p. 165, 1892.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1892 b). Courtes Notices sur les Hirudinées, IV. Description de la Glossiphonia marginata. Bull. Soc. Zool. de France, xvii. pp. 173–178, figs. 1, 2.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1892 c). Courtes Notices sur les Hirudinées, V. Description de la Glossiphonia sexoculata. Bull. Soc. Zool. de France, xvii. pp. 178–182, figs. 1, 2.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1892 d). Sur la présence de la Trocheta subviridis en Ligurie, et description de cette Hirudinée. Atti delta Soc. ligustica di scienze naturali e geografiche, iii. No. 4 (31 pp., 8 figs.). 8vo. 1892.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1892 e). Revision des Hirudinées du Musée de Dresde. Abh. u. Ber. d. K. Zool. u. Anthr.-Ethn. Mus. Dresden, 1892—93. No. 4.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1892 f). Description de la Glossiphonia tessellata. Mém. Soc. Zool. de France, v. pp. 56–68, 1 fig.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1892 g). Présence de la Glossiphonia tessellata au Chili. Actes de la Soc. Scientifique du Chili, ii. pp. 177–187, figs. 1 and 2. 4to. Santiago, 1892.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1893 a). Revision des Hirudinées du Musée de Turin. Boll. Mus. Zool. Univ. di Torino, viii. No. 145, 1893.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1893 b). Sur quelques Hirudinées du Piémont. Boll. Mus. Zool. Univ. di Torino, viii. No. 146, 1893.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1893 c). Courtes notices sur les Hirudinées, ix. Variations de la constitution du somite. Bull. Soc. Zool. de France, xviii. p. 30.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1893 d). Courtes notices sur les Hirudinées, x. Hirudinées de l'Europe boréale. Bull. Soc. Zool. de France, xviii. p. 92.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1893 e). Courtes notices sur les Hirudinées, XV. Sur la Nephelis sexoculata, Schneider. Bull. Soc. Zool. de France, xviii. p. 194.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1893 f). Sur la Nephelis scripturata, Schneider. Bull. Soc. Zool. de France, xviii. p. 195.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1893 g). Sur la Nephelis crassipunctata, Schneider. Bull. Soc. Zool. de France, xviii. p. 197.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1893 h). Courtes notices sur les Hirudinées, XVIII. Encore la Glossiphonia tessellata. Bull. Soc. Zool. de France, xviii. p. 197.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1893 i). Hirudinées—Viaggio del Dr E. Festa in Palestina. Boll. Mus. Zool. Univ. di Torino, viii. No. 161, p. 3.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1893 k). Hirudinées—Voyage du Dr Th. Barrois en Syrie. Rév. biol. Nord France, vi. pp. 41–46.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1894 a). Courtes notices sur les Hirudinées, XIX. Sur les Branchellion des mers d'Europe. Bull. Soc. Zool. de France, xix. 1894.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1894 b). Hirudinées de l'ltalie continental et insulaire. Boll. Mus. Zool. Univ. di Torino, ix. No. 192, 1894.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1896 a). Hirudinées. Viaggio del dott. A. Borelli nella Argentina e nel Paraguay. Boll. Mus. Zool. Univ. di Torino, xi. No. 263.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1896 b). Hirudineen aus dem Togoland. Arch. Naturg. lxxii. pp. 49–53, pl. iii.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1896 c). Courtes notices sur lea Hirudinées, XXIV. Presénce de la Glossiphonia complanata en Amérique. Bull. Soc. Zool. de France, xxi. p. 140.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1897). Hirudinées du Musée de Leyde, in Notes from the Leyden Museum,xix. pp. 73–133, pls. iv—vi, text figs. 7–20.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1900). Hirudinea. Hamburger Magalhaensische Sammelreise, v. pl. 4 (1900).Google Scholar
Blumenbach, J. F. (1779). Handbuch der Naturgeschichte. 8vo. Göttingen, 1779—80.Google Scholar
Blumenbach, J. F. (1807). Ibid. ed. 8.Google Scholar
Blumenbach, J. F. (1825). A Manual of the Elements of Natural History. Translated from the tenth German edition. 8vo. London, 1825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bojanus, L. H. (1819). In Journ. Physique (Martini) lxxxviii. p. 468, pl., figs. 1—5.Google Scholar
Bolsius, H. (1894 a). Sur les organes ciliés des Glossiphonides. Ann. Soc. Bruxelles, xviii. pp. 27–32.Google Scholar
Bolsius, H. (1894 b). Contributions à l'anatomie des Glossiphonides. Zool. Anz. xvii. pp. 292–295, fig. 1.Google Scholar
Bolsius, H. (1895). Un parasite de la Glossiphonia sexoculata. Mem. Pontif. Accad. Nuovi Lincei, xi. 1895, pp. 159–164 (Gregarine).Google Scholar
Bosc, L. A. G. (1802). Histoire Naturelle des Vers. I. Paris.Google Scholar
Bosc, L. A. G. (1819). Article “Sangsue” in Nouveau Dictionnaire d'Histoire Naturelle, appliquée aux arts, xxxiv. New ed. 36 vols. 8vo. Paris, 1816—19.Google Scholar
Bourne, A. G. (1880). On the structure of the Nephridia of the Medicinal Leech. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci. xx. pp. 283–302, pls. xxiv and xxv.Google Scholar
Bourne, A. G. (1884). Contributions to the anatomy of the Hirudinea. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci. xxiv. (1884), pp. 419–506, pls. xxiv—xxxiv.Google Scholar
Bowerbank, J. S. (1845). On the Structure of the Cocoon of a Leech. Ann. and Mag. of Nat. Hist. xv. (1845), pp. 301–305, pl. xviii, figs. 1—10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandes, G. (1899). Die Begattung von Nephelis. Zeitschr. f. Naturw. lxxii. pp. 122–124.Google Scholar
Brandes, G. (1900). Die Begattung von Clepsine tessulata. Zeitschr. f. Naturw. lxxii. pp. 126–128.Google Scholar
Brandt, J. F., et al. Ratzeburg, J. T. C. (1829). Medizinische Zoologie…, ii. 2 vols. 4to. Berlin, 1829—33.Google Scholar
Braun, J. F. P. (1805). Systematische Beschreibung einiger Egelarten. 4to. Berlin, 1805.Google Scholar
Brightwell, T. (1842 a). On Hirudo geometra, Linn., and some other species of British Freshwater Leeches. Ann. and Mag. of Nat. Hist. ix. (1842), pp. 11–15, pi. i.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brightwell, T. (1842 b). The same, trans, into German. Froriep's Neue Notizen, No. 464, Bd. xxii. p. 65.Google Scholar
Bristol, C. L. (1899). The metamerism of Nepkelis. Journ. Morphol. xv. pp. 17–72, pls. iv—viii.Google Scholar
Brossat, A. (1822). Extrait d'une Memoire sur diverges Sangsues…. Journ. de Pharmacie, viii. p. 34.Google Scholar
Bruguiére, J. G. (1824). Tableau encyclopédique et méthodique des Trois Règnes de la Nature. Vers…et Polypiers, I. 4to. Paris, 1824.Google Scholar
Brumpt, E. (1900). Reproduction des Hirudinées. Formation du cocon chez Piscicola et Herpobdella. Bull. Soc. Zool de France, xxv. pp. 47–51, fig. 1.Google Scholar
Bürger, O. (1894). Neue Beiträge zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Hirudineen. Zeitschr. wiss. Zool. lviii. p. 440, pls. xxvi—xxviii.Google Scholar
Bürger, O. (1902). Weitere Beiträge zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Hirudineen. Zur Embryologie von Clepsine. Zeitschr. wiss. Zool. lxxii. pp. 525–544, pls. xxx—xxxii.Google Scholar
Carena, H. (1820). Monographie du genre Hirudo, on description des espèces de Sangsues qui se trouvent ou qui sont en usage en Piémont. Mem. Real. Accad. Scienz. Torino, xxv. p. 273, 2 pls. (coloured).Google Scholar
Carena, H. (1823). Mem. Real. Accad. Scienz. Torino Supplement, xxviii. p. 331.Google Scholar
Carlet, G. (1888 a). La mode de fixation des ventouses de la sangsue, étudié par la méthode graphique. C. R. de I'Acad, des Sciences, xcvi. pp. 448, 449.Google Scholar
Carlet, G. (1888 b). La procéedé opératoire de la sangsue. Ann. Sci. Nat. (6), xv. No. 5, 5 pp.Google Scholar
Castle, W. E. (1900 a). Some North American Fresh-water Rhynchobdellidae, and their parasites. Bull. Mus. Zool. Harvard, xxxvi. No. 2, pp. 17–61, pls. i—viii and 4 figs.Google Scholar
Castle, W. E. (1900 b). The Metamerism of the Hirudinea. Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts and Sci. xxxv. No. 15, p. 285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chworostansky, C. (1888). Organes génitaux del'Hirudo et del'Aulastoma. Zool. Anz. ix. pp. 446–448.Google Scholar
Collin, A. (1892). Kleine Mittheilungen über Würmer. Sitzungs. Berlinische nat. Freunde, 1892, p. 164.Google Scholar
Croockewit, J. M. (1894). über die Kiefer der Hirudineen. Zool. Anz. xvi. pp. 427–429.Google Scholar
Cuvier Baron, G. L. (1798). Tableau élémentaire de 1'Histoire Naturelle des Animaux. 8vo. Paris.Google Scholar
Cuvier Baron, G. L. (1817). Le Règne Animal. ii. 4 vols. 8vo. Paris.Google Scholar
Cuvier Baron, G. L. (1836). Le Règne Animal ed. 3, ii. 3 vols. 8vo. Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Dalyell Sir, J. G. (1827). Note on breeding of Hirudo muricata, in Edin. New Phil. Journ. 1827, p. 391.Google Scholar
Dalyell Sir, J. G. (1853). The Powers of the Creator displayed in the Creation. ii. 2 vols. 4to. London, 1851—1853.Google Scholar
Daudin, F. M. (1800). Recueil de mémoires sur des espèces…de Mollusques, de Vers et de Zoophytes. 12mo. Paris.Google Scholar
Delle Chiaje, E. (1823). Sulla Sanguisuga medicinale…in Memorie sulla storia e notomia degli animali senza vertebre del Regno di Napoli. I. 4 vols. 4to. Napoli, 1823—1829.Google Scholar
Delle Chiaje, E. (1834). Ueber Albione muricata…in Isis, Encycl. Zeitung v. Oken. 4to. Jena.Google Scholar
Derheims, J. L. (1825). Histoire naturelle et mélicale des Sangsues. 8vo. Paris, 1825.Google Scholar
Diesing, C. M. (1850). Systema Helminthum, I. 2 vols. Vindobonae, 1850.Google Scholar
Diesing, C. M. (1858). Revision der Myzhelminthen. Abtheilung: Bdellideen. Sitzungsber. Akad. Wien, xxxiii.Google Scholar
Dillenius, J. J. (1719). De Hirudine, in Ephem. Acad. Nat. Cur. (Norimburg) cent. vii. pl. v, figs. 1—4 (cited by Moquin-Tandon, 1846).Google Scholar
Draparnaud, J. P. R. (1803). Dissertation sur l'utilité de l'histoire naturelle en médecine. 8vo. Montpellier, 1803.Google Scholar
Dutilleui, G. (1886 a). Recherches anatomiques et histologiques sur la Pontobdella muricata. Compt. rend. Association Française, 1886, pt. 2, pp. 572–587, pl. xii.Google Scholar
Dutilleui, G. (1886 b). Sur l'appareil génital de la Pontobdella muricata. Bull. Sci. Nord, ix. pp. 125–130, 1 pl.Google Scholar
Dutilleui, G. (1887). Sur quelques points de l'anatomie des Hirudinées rhynchobdelles. Compt. rend. Acad. Sci. (Paris), cv. pp. 128–130. Transl. in Ann. and Mag. of Nat. Hist. (5), xx. pp. 150–152.Google Scholar
Dutrochet, H. (1817). Note sur une Annélide d'un genre nouveau. Bull, des Sciences, par la Socété Philomatique de Paris, 1817, p. 130.Google Scholar
Ébrard, E. (1857). Nouvelle Monographie des Sangsues Médicinales. 8vo. Paris.Google Scholar
Egidy, —. (1844). Die Blutegelzucht nächst ausf. Beschr. d. Blutegel, seiner Arten und Varietäten (cited by Johnston, 1865).Google Scholar
Evans, W. (1905). Additions to Scott and Lindsay's list of Animals…in the Upper Elf Loch. Ann. Scott. Nat. Hist. lvi. p. 215.Google Scholar
Fage, L. (1904). Sur les fonctions sergastoplasmiques des cellules néphridiales de la Sangsue. C. R. de l'cad. des Sci. cxxxviii. pp. 1450—1452.Google Scholar
Filatow, D. (1898). Einige Beobachtungen über die Entwicklungsvorgänge bei Nephelis vulgaris. Zool. Anz. xxi. pp. 645–647, 2 figs.Google Scholar
de Filippi, F. (1837). Memoria sugli Anellidi della famiglia delle Sanguisughe. 4to. Milano, 1837.Google Scholar
de Filippi, F. (1839). Lettera al signor Dott. M. Rusconi su l'anatomia e lo sviluppo delle Clepsine. Giornale delle scienze medico-chirurgiche di Pavia, xi. fasc. 61. 8vo. Pavia, 1839.Google Scholar
Fleming, J. (1822). The Philosophy of Zoology. ii. 2 vols. 8vo. Edinburgh. 1822.Google Scholar
Fleming, J. (1818). In Memoirs of the Wernerian Nat. Hist. Society, ii. 8vo. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Frisch, J. L. (1729). Beschreibung von allerley Insecten in Teutschland…, vi. 4to. Nicolai, 1721—1738.Google Scholar
Gedge, J. (1869). Rediscovery of Trocheta subviridis (in England). Ann. and Mag. of Nat. Hist. (4), iii. p. 396.Google Scholar
Gervais, P. (1836). Article “Hirudinée” in Guériu's Dictionnaire pittoresque d'Histoire Naturelle, iii. 8vo. Paris, 1833—34.Google Scholar
Gervais, P. (1845). In Bull. Soc. d'hist. nat. de France, 1845, p. 572 (cited by Diesing, 1850).Google Scholar
Gesner, C. (1558). Medici Tigurini, historiae Animalium. Lib. iv. (de Piscium…natura). Tiguri, 1551—1558.Google Scholar
Gibbs, H. (1898). Notes on Pontobdella muricata. Journ. Marine Biol. Assoc. v. pp. 330–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gisler, N. (1758). Om Blod-iglars nytta uti medecin. (On the use of leeches in medicine.) Svenska vetensk. acad. Handlingar, 1758, p. 96.Google Scholar
Gmelin, J. F. (1788). Systema Naturae Linnaei, ed. 13, cura Gmelin, J. F., I. pt. 6. 3 vols. 8vo. Lipsiae, 1788—1793.Google Scholar
Graf, A. (1894 a). The sphincter of the terminal vesicle of H. medicinalis. Journ. Morphol. ix. pp. 485–487, 10 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graf, A. (1894 b). The funnels and vesiculae terminates of Nephelis, Aulastoma and Clepsine. Trans. New York Ac. xiii. pp. 239–241 (Preliminary Note).Google Scholar
Graf, A. (1899). Hirudineenstudien. N. Acta. Ac. German (4to. Halle), pp. 215–404, 15 pls. and 26 text figs.Google Scholar
Grant, R. E. (1827). On the eggs of Pontobdella muricata. Edinburgh Journ. of Nat. Science (1827), No. 14, p. 160.Google Scholar
Gratiolet, P. (1862). Recherches sur l'organisation du système vasculaire dans la sangsue médicinale et l'aulastome vorace. Ann. Sci. Nat. (4), xvii. (Zool.), p. 174.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. (1850). On a Leech new to the British Fauna. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1850, p. 52.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. (1851). On a Leech new to the British Fauna (Trocheta). Reprinted verbatim in Ann. and Mag. of Nat. Hist. vii. ser. 2, p. 429.Google Scholar
Griffiths, A. B. (1889). On the Nephridia of H. medicinalis. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, xiv. pp. 346–348.Google Scholar
Grube, A. E. (1840). Actinien, Echinodermen und Würmer des Adriatischen und Mittelmeers…. 4to. Königsberg, 1840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grube, A. E. (1844). Untersuchungen über die Entwickelung der Anneliden, i. 1, p. 45, pls. i—iii (cited by Diesing, 1850).Google Scholar
Grube, A. E. (1851). Die Familien der Anneliden. 8vo. Berlin, 1851.Google Scholar
Grube, E. (1871). Beschreibung einiger Egel-Arten. Archiv f. Naturg. xxxvii. pp. 87–121, pls. iii and iv.Google Scholar
Guerne, J. de (1892). Sur la dissémination des Hirudinées par les Palmipédes. C. R. Soc. biol. iv. pp. 360–634. Trans, in Ann. and Mag. of Nat. Hist. (6), x. pp. 117–120.Google Scholar
Hardy, J. (1846). In Trans. Tyneside Naturalists' Field Club, i. p. 96. Newcastle-on-Tyne.Google Scholar
Harting, J. E. (1877). On the occurrence in England of Dutrochet's Land Leech. Zoologist, 3rd ser. I. (1877), pp. 515–523.Google Scholar
Havet, J. (1899). Structure du système nerveux des Annélides (Nephelis, Clepsine, Hirudo, etc.). Cellule, xvii. pp. 65–136, 7 pls.Google Scholar
Haycraft, J. B. (1884). On the action of a Secretion obtained from the Medicinal Leech on the Coagulation of the Blood. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, xxxvi, p. 478–487.Google Scholar
Henking, H. (1892). Darstellung des Darmcanals von Hirudo. Festschr. zum 70ten Geburtstage R. Leuckarts, pp. 319–327, pl. xxxiii.Google Scholar
Hermann, E. (1875). Das Centralnervensystem von H. medicinalis. 119 pp. 18 pls. Munchen, 1875.Google Scholar
Hertwig, O. (1887). Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Bildung, Befruchtung, und Theilung des thierischen Eies. 2er Theil. 1. Die ersten Entwickelungsvorgänge im Ei der Hirudineen. Morphol. Jahrb. iii. pp. 2–32Google Scholar
Hertwig, O. (1887). Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Bildung, Befruchtung, und Theilung des thierischen Eies. 2er Theil. 1. Die ersten Entwickelungsvorgänge im Ei der Hirudineen. Morphol. Jahrb. iii. pp. 53–83, pls. i—iii.Google Scholar
Hill, J. (1752). General Natural History, iii. (History of Animals). 3 vols. Folio. London, 1748—52.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, C. K. (1880). Untersuchungen über den Bau und die Entwickelungs geschiohte der Hirudineen. 4to. Haarlem.Google Scholar
Holt, E. L. W. (1907). Rept. Fisheries Ireland (1905). Dublin, 1907, pp. 102, 103.Google Scholar
Home, Sir E., Bart, . (1814). Lectures on Comparative Anatomy. London, 1814—1828, 6 vols. 4to. (H. medicinalis, i. p. 364; ii. pi. lxx; iv. pi. xxxix, fig. 3.)Google Scholar
Houghton, , The Rev, W. (1860). On the Discovery of the Snail-Leech, Glossiphonia marginata, in England. Ann. and Mag. of Nat. Hist. v. 3 ser. p. 248, No. 27, pi. xvi, C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houghton, (1861). Remarks on the Glossiphonidae. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci. i. new ser. (1861), p. 33.Google Scholar
Houghton, (1865). “Snail-Leeches,''with a Monograph of the British species. Intellectual Observer, Sept. 1865, pp. 81–91, 2 pls. (coloured).Google Scholar
Jijima, J. (1882). The structure of the ovary and the origin of the eggs and the egg-strings in Nephelis. Zool. Anz. v. pp. 12–14.Google Scholar
Johansson, L. (1896 a). Über den Blutumlauf bei Piscicola und Calliobdella. Lilljeborg's Festschr. Upsala, 1896, pp. 317–330, pl. xvii.Google Scholar
Johansson, L.(1896 b). Bidrag till Kännedomen om Sveriges Ichthyobdelliden. Akademsk. afh. Upsala, 1896, 8vo. 122 pp. 10 pls. (Abstract in Zool. Central, iv. pp. 619–623, 2 figs.)Google Scholar
Johansson, L. (1898 a). Die Ichthyobdelliden im Zool. Reichsmuseum in Stockholm. öfvers. af K. Vet.-Akad. Förh. lv. pp. 665–687.Google Scholar
Johansson, L. (1898 b). Einige systematisch wichtige Theile der inneren Organisation der Ichthyobdelliden. Zool. Anz. xxi. No. 573, p. 581.Google Scholar
Johansson, L. (1909). Hirudinea. Die S¨sswasserfauna Deutschlands von Prof. Dr Brauer, 13, pp. 67–84, Jena, 1909.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. R. (1816). A Treatise on the Medicinal Leech. 8vo. London, 1816.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. R. (1817). Observations on Glossopora. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London. 4to. p. 21, pl. iv.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. R. (1825). Further observations on the Medicinal Leech. 8vo. London, 1825.Google Scholar
Johnston, G. (1846). An Index to the British Annelides. Ann. and Mag. of Nat. Hist. xvi. 1845, Supplement. (Leeches. pp. 439–442.)Google Scholar
Johnston, G. (1865). A Catalogue of the British Non-parasitical Worms in…the British Museum.Google Scholar
Kirby, W. (1794). Description Of Three New Species Of Hirudo. Trans. Linn. Soc. London. 4To. ii. P. 320, Pl. Xxix. (Only One Species Is A Leech, Viz. Hirudo Crenata = Glossosiphonia Complanata.)Google Scholar
Kurzmann, , —. (1819). In London Med. And Physic. Journ. xli. P. 312 (Cited By Johnston, 1865).Google Scholar
de Lamarck, J. B. P. (1818). Histoire Naturelle Des Animaux Sans VertÉBres, v. 7 Vols. 8Vo. Paris, 1815—1822. 'Google Scholar
de Lamarck, J. B. P. (1838). Histoire Naturelle Des Animaux Sans VertÉBres 2 ÉD. Par G. P. Deshayes Et H. Milne-Edwards. 11 Vols. 8Vo. Paris, 1835—1845.Google Scholar
SirLankester, E. Ray (1880 A). Observations On The Microscopical Anatomy Of The Medicinal Leech. Zool. Anz. iii. pp. 85–90.Google Scholar
SirLankester, E. Ray (1880 b). On Intra-epithelial capillaries in the Integument of the Medicinal Leech. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci. xx. pp. 303–306.Google Scholar
Lankester, SirRay, E. (1880 c). On the connective and vasifactive tissues of the Medicinal Leech. Quart. Journ. Micr. Soc. xx. pp. 307–317, pls. xxvii and xxviii.Google Scholar
Leach, W. E. (1815). Zoological Miscellany, ii. 8vo. London.Google Scholar
Leach, W. E. (1824). Article Annulosa in Encyclopaedia Britannica. (See Supplement.)Google Scholar
Ledermüller, M. F. (1764). Amusements microscopiques, i. 4to. Nuremburg, 1764—1768.Google Scholar
Lee, H. (1871). First Report…of the Croydon Microscopical Club, 1871, pp. 22, 23 (cited by Harting, 1877).Google Scholar
Leo, J. (1835). Ueber einige ausgezeichnete anatomische und physiologische Verhéltnisse der Piscicola geometra. Müiler's Archiv für Anatomie, 1835, pp. 419–427, pl. xi.Google Scholar
Leuckart, R. (1894). Die Parasiten des Menschen. New and revised ed. Leipzig, 1894.Google Scholar
Leydig, F. (1849 a). Zur Anatomie von Piscicola geometrica mit theilweiser Vergleichung anderer einheimischer Hirudineen, in Zeitschr. wiss. Zool. 1 Bd. 1849.Google Scholar
Leydig, F. (1849 b). Zum Circulations- und Respirationssystem von Nephelis und Clepsine, in Bericht. Zool. Anst. Würzburg. Leipzig, 1849.Google Scholar
Leydig, F. (1851). Anatomisches über Branchellion und Pontobdella. Zeitschr. wiss. Zool. 3 Bd. 1851, pp. 315–324, pl. ix.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. (1746). Fauna Suecica, ed. 1.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. (1754). Museum Adolphi Friderici Regis…in quo…animalia…describuntur.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. (1758). Systema Naturae, ed. 10.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. (1761). Fauna Suecica. ed. 2.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. (1767). Systema Naturae, ed. 12.Google Scholar
Livanow, N. (1902). Die Hirudineen-Gattung Hemiclepsis Vejd. Zool. Jahrb. (Systematik), xvii. (1902), p. 339.Google Scholar
Livanow, N. (1903). Untersuchungen zur Morphologie der Hirudineen. I. Das Neuro und Myosomit der Hirudineen. Zool. Jahrb. (anat.), xix. i. pp. 29–90, pls. ii—vi.Google Scholar
Livanow, N. (1904). Untersuchungen zur Morphologie der Hirudineen. II. Das Nervensystem des vordern Körperendes und seine Metamerie. Zool. Jahrb. (anat.), xx. pp. 153–226, pls. ix—xi.Google Scholar
Livanow, N. (1907). Untersuchungen zur Morphologie der Hirudineen. III. Das Nervensystem und die Metamerie des vordern Körperendes von Herpobdella atomaria, Zool. Jahrb. (anat.), xxiii. pp. 683–699, pi. xxxvii.Google Scholar
Malm, A. W. (1860). Svenska Iglar. Kongl. Vetenskaps och Vitterhets Samhälles Handlingar, viii. 1860.Google Scholar
M'Intosh, W. C. (1874). On the Invertebrate Fauna…of St Andrews. Ann. and Mag. of Nat. Hist. xiv. (4), p. 192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M'Intosh, W. C. (1875). The Marine Invertebrates and Fishes of St Andrews. 4to. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Mégnin, P. (1905). Sangsues parasites des Palmipèdes. Arch, de Parasitologic (Paris), x. pp. 71–76, ill.Google Scholar
Merret, C. (1667). Pinax rerum naturalium Britannicarum,… 12mo. Londini, 1667.Google Scholar
Metschnikoff, E. (1871). Beiträge zur Entwickelungsgeschichte einiger niederen Thiere. Bull. Petersb. xv. pp. 505, 506 (Clepsine bioculata).Google Scholar
Moquin-Tandon, A. (1826). Monographic de la famille des Hirudinées. Ed. 1. 4to. Montpellier, 1826.Google Scholar
Moquin-Tandon, A. (1846). Monographic de la famille des Hirudinées Nouvelle édition. 1 vol. 8vo. and Atlas. Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, F. (1844 a). Ueber Hirudo tessulata und marginata. Archiv für Naturg. 8vo. Berlin, 1844.Google Scholar
Müller, F. (1844 b). De Hirudinibus circa Berolinum hucusque observatis. Inaug. Diss. Berlin, 1844.Google Scholar
Müller, F. (1846). Ueber Geschlechtstheile von Clepsine und Nephelis. Archiv für Anat. (Müller). 8vo. Berlin, 1846.Google Scholar
Müller, J. (1828). Ueber den Kreislauf des Blutes bey Hirudo vulgaris, in Meckel's Arch. f. Anat. und Physiol. 1828, p. 22.Google Scholar
Müller, L. G. (1830). Der medicinische Blutegel oder naturhistorische Beschreibung des Blutegels (cited by Moquin-Tandon, 1846).Google Scholar
Müller, O. F. (1774). Vermium Terrestrium et Fluviatilium. I. Pars 2. 4to. Havniae et Lipsiae, 1773—74.Google Scholar
Müller, O. F. (1776). Zoologiae Danicae Prodromus. 8vo. Havniae, 1776.Google Scholar
de Muralto, J. (1673). Vademecum anatomicum seu clavis medica. Tiguri, 1673.Google Scholar
Murie, J. (1865). On a leech,…found in the Viscera of a Moluccan Deer. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1865, pp. 659–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, H. A. (1873). Contributions to a Fauna Canadensis; being an Account of Animals dredged in Lake Ontario in 1872. Canadian Journal, xiii. p. 490 (Toronto).Google Scholar
Ninni, A. P. (1889). Notizie di caccia e note zoologiche…Hirudinea raccolte nelle acque dolci del Veneto. Rivista ital. di scienze nat. e Bolletino natural, ix, No. 20, p. 251, 1889.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, J. (1885). Zur Entwickelungsgeschichte der Geschlechtsorgane der Hirudineen. Zool. Anz. viii. pp. 181–184.Google Scholar
Oka, A. (1894). Beiträge zur Anatomie der Clepsine. Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool. Bd. 58, p. 79.Google Scholar
Oken, L. (1815). Lehrbuch der Naturgeschichte. III (Zool.). 2 vols, and Atlas. Jena, 1815—16.Google Scholar
Ollson, P. (1875). Bidrag till Skandinaviens Helminthfauna. Svenska Ak. Handl. xiv. pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
örley, L. (1886). A magyarorsźagi pióczák faunaja (Fauna Hirudinearum Hungariae). Math, és termeszett. Közlemények, xxii. p. 63, 1886.Google Scholar
Payraudeau, B. C. (1826). Catalogue descriptif…des Annélides…de l'lle de Corse. 8vo. Paris, 1826.Google Scholar
Pelletier, et Huzardfils (1825). Recherches sur le genre Hirudo. Journ. de Pharmacie, xi. p. 105.Google Scholar
Pennant, T. (1766). The British Zoology. iv. Folio. London, 1766.Google Scholar
Pennant, T. (1812). The British Zoology New ed. iv. 4 vols. 8vo. London, 1812.Google Scholar
Pérez, C., et al. Gendre, E. (1904 a). Sur les fibres musculaires du Branchellion. C. R. Soc. Biol. lvii. pp. 113–115.Google Scholar
Pérez, C. (1904 b). Sur l'ovogenèse du Branchellion. C. R. Soc. Biol. lvii. pp. 605, 606.Google Scholar
Pérez, C. (1906). Différenciations tendineuses épithéliales chez le Branchellion. C. R. Soc. Biol. lvi. pp. 447–448; et Réunion Biologique de Bordeaux, 1906, pp. 61, 62.Google Scholar
Picaglia, L. (1877). I Discofori racoolti e classificati dal Dott. Luigi Picaglia. Annuario della Societá dei Naturalisti in Modena, xi, p. 140. 8vo. Modena.Google Scholar
Plehn, M. (1898). über die Vertilgung von Fischegeln (Piscicola). Allgem. Fisch. Zeitg. xxiii. (1898), pp. 370–372.Google Scholar
Polonio, A. F. (1860). Catalogo delle Bdellidee italiane. Pavia, 1860.Google Scholar
Polonio, A. F. (1861). Monografia del genere Aulostomum. Atti della Societa Italiana di Scienze Naturali, iii. p. 39. Milano, 1861.Google Scholar
Polonio, A. F. (1863). Bdellideorum italicorum prodromus. 8vo. Bononiae, 1863.Google Scholar
de Quatrefages, A. (1852). Études sur les types inférieurs de Pembranchement des Annelés. Mémoire sur le Branchellion d'Orbigny. Ann. des Sci. Nat. xvii. sér. 3, 1852.Google Scholar
Quekett, J. (1843). On the Minute Anatomy of the Horse-Leech, Haemopis sanguisorba (Sav.), Hirudo vorax (Johnston). Zoologist, i. pp. 17–21.Google Scholar
Quekett, J. (1843). On the Minute Anatomy of the Horse-Leech, Haemopis sanguisorba (Sav.), Hirudo vorax (Johnston). Zoologist, i. pp. 88–94.Google Scholar
Quekett, J. (1843). On the Minute Anatomy of the Horse-Leech, Haemopis sanguisorba (Sav.), Hirudo vorax (Johnston). Zoologist, i. pp. 324— 330.Google Scholar
Ranke, J. (1875). Beiträge zu der Lehre von den Uebergangs-Sinnesorganen…das Sehorgan der Hirudineen. Quekett, J. (1843). On the Minute Anatomy of the Horse-Leech, Haemopis sanguisorba (Sav.), Hirudo vorax (Johnston). Zoologist, Zeitschr. wiss. Zool. xxv. pp. 152–164, pl. x (abstract in Nature, xiii. p. 75).Google Scholar
Rathke, H. (1862). Beiträge zur Entwickelungsgeschichte der Hirudineen. Leipzig, 1862.Google Scholar
Ray, J. (1710). Historia Insectorum;… Sm. 4to. Londini, 1710.Google Scholar
Ray Society Reports (1845). Reports on the progress of Zoology and Botany of 1841—42. Ray Society, 8vo. London, 1845.Google Scholar
Retzius, G. (1891). Zur Kenntniss des centralen Nervensystems der Würmer. Biologische Untersuchungen, Neue Folge, ii. Stockholm, 1891, pp. 1–28, pls. i—ix.Google Scholar
Rhode, E. (1891). Histologische Untersuchungen über das Nervensystem der Hirudineen. Zool. Beitr. iii. pp. 1–68, Taf. 1—7; also in S. B. Ak. Berlin, 1891, pp. 21–32.Google Scholar
Risso, A. (1826). Histoire Naturelle…de l'Europe Méridionale…. iv. 5 vols. 8vo. Paris, 1826.Google Scholar
Robertson, M. (1909). Further Notes on a Trypanosome found in the Alimentary Tract of Pontobdella muricata. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci. liv. N.S. pt. 1, pp. 119–139, pl. ix (T. raiae).Google Scholar
Robin, C. (1875). Méinoire sur le développement embryogénique des Hirudinées. 4to. Paris.Google Scholar
Rondelet, G. (1554). Libri. de Piscibus marinis, etc. lib. de Insect. et Zoophyt. vii. Folio. Lugduni, 1554.Google Scholar
Rondelet, G. (1558). La première (et seconde) partie de l'Histoire entière des Poissons, traduite en François, ii. 4to. Lion, 1558.Google Scholar
Rösel von Rosenhof, A. J. (1747). Der monatlich herausgegebenen Insecten Belustigung. iii. Nürnberg, 1746—1761.Google Scholar
de Saint Amans, B. (1825). Description d'une espèce nouvelle de Sangsue. Mém. Soc. Linn, de Paris. 8vo. iii. p. 193, 1 pl.Google Scholar
Saint-Loup, R. (1885 a). Recherches sur l'organisation des Hirudinées. Ann. Sci. Nat. (6), xviii. No. 2, 127 pp. pls. vi—xiii.Google Scholar
Saint-Loup, R. (1885 b). Remarques sur la morphologie des Hirudinées d'eau douce. Bull. Soc. Philom. (1), ix. pp. 23–26.Google Scholar
Saint-Loup, R. (1886). Sur une nouvelle Ichthyobdelle. C. R. Ac. Sci. cii. pp. 1180–1183.Google Scholar
Salomon, E. D. (1760). An maerkningar om iglars bruke (Observations on the use of leeches), in Sventka Vetenskaps- Acad. Handlingar, 1760, p. 132, and C. R. Ac. Sci. 1764, p. 57.Google Scholar
Savigny, J. C. (1822). Système des Annélides,…in Description de l'Égypte…publié par les ordres…de Napoléon le Grand. Folio. Paris. [N.B. The date (1822) assigned to this work is that given in C. D. Sherborn's bibliography in Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1897, p. 285.]Google Scholar
Savigny, J. C. (1826). Système des Annélides,…in Description de l'Égypte…publié par les ordres…de Napoléon le Grand 2 éd. 8vo. Paris.Google Scholar
Scharff, R. F. (1898). The Irish Fresh-water Leeches. Irish Naturalist, vii. pp. 188–194.Google Scholar
Schinz, H. R. (1822). Das Thierreich von Cuvier. Aus dem Französischen…von H. R. Schinz. ii. 4 vols. 8vo. Stuttgart, Tübingen, 1821–25.Google Scholar
Schmarda, L. K. (1861). Neue wirbellose Thiere beobachtet und gesammelt auf einer Reise um die Erde in den Jahren 1853—57. i. Folio. Leipzig, 1861.Google Scholar
Schneider, A. (1880). Über die Auflösung der Eier und Spermatozoen in den Geschlechtsorganen. Zool. Anz. iii. pp. 19–21, 256 and 257.Google Scholar
Schneider, A. (1883). Das Ei und seine Befruchtung. 4to. Breslau, 1883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrank, F. von P. von (1803). Fauna Boica, iii. 2. Ingolstadt, 1803.Google Scholar
Schuberg, A. (1899). Beiträge zur Histologie des männlichen Geschlechtsorgan von Hirudo und Aulastomum. Zeitschr. wiss. Zool. lxvi. pp. 1–15, pl. i.Google Scholar
Schuberg, A. (1904). Über einen in den Muskelzellen von Nephelis schmarotzenden Nematoden. Verhandl. Vereins zu Heidelberg, vii. pp. 629–632.Google Scholar
Schultze, O. (1883). Beiträge zur Anatomie des Excretionsapparates der Hirudineen. Arch. f. mikr. Anat. xxii. pp. 78–92, pl. i.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, T. (1901). Notes on some parasites of fishes. 19th Annual Rept. Fish Board, Scotland, Part iii. pp. 120 (Hirvdinea. pp. 137–141).Google Scholar
Selensky, W. (1906). Zur Kenntniss des Gefässystems der Piscicola. Zool. Anz. xxxi. 1906, pp. 33, 34.Google Scholar
Serres, M. de (1822). Essai sur les animaux du midi de la France, p. 80 (cited by Moquin-Tandon, 1846).Google Scholar
Sibbald, R. (1683). Scotia illustrata, sive Prodromus Historiae Naturalis, etc. 3 parts in 1 vol. Folio. Edinburgh 1683—84.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J. (1806). The British Miscellany. ii. 8vo. London, 1804–6.Google Scholar
Spiess, C. (1902). La structure intime de l'appareil digestif de la Sangsue (H. medicinalis.) Arch. Sci. Nat. (Geneva), xiv. pp. 548–552.Google Scholar
Spiess, C. (1903). Recherches…sur l'appareil digestif de la Sangsue. Rev. Suisse Zool. (Geneva), xi. pp. 151–239 and 5 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiess, C. (1905 a). La question du foie dans la Sangsue médicinale. Compt. Rend. Soc. Biol. 1905, pp. 415–417 and p. 577.Google Scholar
Spiess, C. (1905 b). Sur la présence des pigments biliaires dans la Sangsue Médicinale. Compt. Rend, de l'Acad. des Sci. cxli. pp. 333 and 506.Google Scholar
Spoof, A. R. (1889). Notes about some species of non-parasitical Worms found in Finland. 8vo. Åbo, 1889.Google Scholar
Stark, J. (1828).Elements of Natural History, ii. 2 vols. 8vo. Edinburgh and London, 1828.Google Scholar
Stewart, C. (1817). Elements of the Natural History of the Animal Kingdom. ii. 2 vols. 8vo. Edinburgh, 1817.Google Scholar
Sukatschoff, B. (1900). Beiträge zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Hirudineen. 1. Zur Kenntnis der Urnieren von Nephelis vulgaris und Aulastomum gulo. Zeitschr. wiss. Zool. lxvii. pp. 618–639, pls. xxxiv and xxxv.Google Scholar
Swammerdam, J. (1737). Bybel der Natuure. Ed. Boerhaave, H. with Latin trans. by Gaubius, H. D.. 2 vols. 4to. Leyden, 1737, 1738 (Hirudo, I. pl. lxii).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Templeton, R. (1836). A Catalogue of the Species of Annulose Animals,…found in Ireland. Ann. and Mag. of Nat. Hist. ix.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. (1841). Additions to the Fauna of Ireland. Ann. and Mag. of Nat. Hist. vii. (1841). Annelida, p. 482.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. (1844). Additions to the Fauna of Ireland. Annelida. Ann. and Mag. of Nat. Hist. xiii. (Leeches, p. 437).Google Scholar
Thompson, W. (1846). Additions to the Fauna of Ireland. Annelida. Ann. and Mag. of Nat. Hist. xviii. (Leeches. pp. 389–391).Google Scholar
Thompson, W. (1856). The Natural History of Ireland, iv. 4 vols. 8vo. London, 1849—56.Google Scholar
Trembley, A. (1744). Mémoires, pour servir à l'Histoire d'un genre de Polypes d'eau douce, etc. 4to. Leidae, 1744.Google Scholar
Turton, W. (1806). A General System of Nature, translated from Gmelin, etc. iv. 7 vols. 8vo. London, 1806.Google Scholar
Turton, W. (1807). British Fauna. 12mo. Swansea, 1807.Google Scholar
Ure, , The Rev. D. (1793). The History of Rutherglen and East Kilbride. 8vo. Glasgow, 1793.Google Scholar
Vaillant, L. (1870). Contributions à l'étude anatomique du Genre Pontobdella. Ann. Sci. Nat. xiii. (1870).Google Scholar
Vejdovsky, F. (1883). Excrecni Soustawa Hirudinei1. Sitzb. des Königl. Böhm. Gesel. des Wissensch. prag. pp. 35–51, 1 pl.Google Scholar
Verrill, A. E. (1874). Synopsis of the North American Freshwater Leeches. Rept. U. S. Fish Commissioner for 1872—3. Part ii. p. 666.Google Scholar
Watson, G. (1813). Dissertatio Inaug. de Hirudinibus. 8vo. Edinburgh, 1813.Google Scholar
Weltner, W. (1887). In Sitzungsber. Ges. naturf. Berlin, p. 85, 1887.Google Scholar
Weser, D. (1765). On Hirudo medicinalis in Linnaei Amoenitates Academicae, ed. 2. vii.Google Scholar
Whitman, C. O. (1878). The Embryology of Clepsine. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci. xviii. new ser. 1878.Google Scholar
Whitman, C. O. (1884). The External Morphology of the Leech. Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts and Sci. xx. p. 76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitman, C. O. (1886). The Leeches of Japan. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci. xxvi. pp. 317–416, pls. xvii—xxi.Google Scholar
Whitman, C. O.(1892). The Metamerism of Clepsine. Festschrift zum siebenzigsten Geburtstage R. Leuekarts. pp. 385–395, pls. xxxiv and lx. 4to. Leipzig, 1892.Google Scholar