Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T15:15:49.560Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Critical Review: Paul Teller's Interpretive Introduction to Quantum Field Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Nick Huggett  and
Robert Weingard
Nick Huggett*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy Brown University
Robert Weingard
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy Rutgers University
*
†Send reprint requests to Robert Weingard, Department of Philosophy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Paul Teller's (1995) new book, “An Interpretive Introduction to Quantum Field Theory”, is a pioneering work. To the best of our knowledge it is the first book by a philosopher devoted not only to explaining what quantum field theory (QFT) is, but to clarifying the conceptual issues and puzzles to which the theory gives rise (though Auyung 1995 treats some different issues in QFT). As such it is an important book, which we hope will greatly stimulate work in the area as other philosophers and physicists react to it.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 63 , Issue 2 , June 1996 , pp. 302 - 314
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auyung, S. Y. (1995), How Is Quantum Field Theory Possible? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, J. S. (1987), “Beables for Quantum Field Theory”, in Bell, J. S. (ed.), Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 173–180.Google Scholar
Bohm, D. and Hiley, B. J. (1993), The Undivided Universe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cao, T. Y. and Schweber, S. S. (1993), “The Conceptual Foundations and Philosophical Aspects of Renormalization Theory”, Synthese 97:32–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldenfeld, N. (1992), Lectures On Phase Transitions And The Renormalization Group. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Huggett, N. (1995), “What Are Quanta and Why Does it Matter?”, in Burian, R., Forbes, M. and Hull, D. (eds.), PSA 1994, Volume Two. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar
Huggett, N. and Weingard, R. (1994a), “Interpretations of Quantum Field Theory”, Philosophy of Science 61:370–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huggett, N. and Weingard, R. (1994b), “The Renormalisation Group and the Effective Field Theory Programme”, Synthese 102:171–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1957), “The Propensity Interpretation of the Calculus of Probability, and the Quantum Theory”, in Körner, S. (ed.), Observation and Interpretation. London: Butterworths, pp. 65–70, 88–89.Google Scholar
Redhead, M. L. G. (1975), “Symmetry in Intertheory Relations”, Synthese 32:77–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roman, P. (1969), Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Streater, R. (1975), “An Outline of Axiomatic Quantum Field Theory”, Reports of Progress in Physics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teller, P. (1989), “Infinite Renormalization”, Philosophy of Science 56:238–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teller, P. (1995), An Interpretive Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Vallintini, A. (1992). On the Pilot-Wave Theory of Classical, Quantum and Sub-Quantum Physics. Ph.D. Thesis. Trieste: International School for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Weingard, R. (1996), “Exotic (Quixotic?) Applications of Bohm's Theory”, in R. Clifton (ed.), Perspectives on Quantum Reality. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar