Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T22:26:44.661Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ecological Dimension of Natural Selection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Bendik Hellem Aaby
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article I argue that we should pay extra attention to the ecological dimension of natural selection. By this I mean that we should view natural selection primarily as acting on the outcomes of the interactions organisms have with their environment, which influences their relative reproductive output. A consequence of this view is that natural selection is not (directly) sensitive to what system of inheritance ensures reoccurrences of organism-environment interactions over generations. I end by showing the consequences of this view when looking at how processes like niche construction and the Baldwin effect relate to natural selection.

Type
Biological Sciences
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 88 , Issue 5 , December 2021 , pp. 1199 - 1209
Copyright
Copyright 2021 by the Philosophy of Science Association. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Special thanks to Felipe Morales for helpful comments on an initial draft of this article. I would also like to thank Angela Potochnik for suggesting some changes to the final manuscript. Finally, I would like to thank Grant Ramsey for commenting on several drafts of this article.

References

Anholt, Robert R. H., and Mackay, Trudy F. C.. 2010. Principles of Behavioral Genetics. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Avital, Eytan, and Jablonka, Eva. 2000. Animal Traditions: Behavioural Inheritance in Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, James M. 1896a. “A New Factor in Evolution.” American Naturalist 30:441–51.Google Scholar
Baldwin, James M.. 1896b. “A New Factor in Evolution (Continued).” American Naturalist 30:536–53.Google Scholar
Bateson, Patrick. 2004. “The Active Role of Behaviour in Evolution.” Biology and Philosophy 19:283–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, Patrick. 2017a. “Adaptability and Evolution.” Interface Focus 7:20160126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, Patrick. 2017b. Behaviour, Development and Evolution. Cambridge: Open Book.10.11647/OBP.0097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, Patrick, and Gluckman, Peter. 2011. Plasticity, Robustness, Development and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandon, Robert N. 1990. Adaptation and Environment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard. 1978. “Replicator Selection and the Extended Phenotype.” Ethology 47 (1): 61–76.Google ScholarPubMed
Dawkins, Richard. 1982. The Extended Phenotype. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dretske, Fred. 1988. Explaining Behavior: Reasons in a World of Causes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Futuyma, Douglas J., and Kirkpatrick, Mark. 2017. Evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Scott F., and Epel, David. 2015. Ecological Developmental Biological: The Environmental Regulation of Development, Health, and Evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 1996. Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2009. Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonka, Eva, and Lamb, Marion J.. 2014. Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, John R., and Davies, Nicholas B.. 1993. An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Laland, Kevin N. 2015. “On Evolutionary Causes and Evolutionary Processes.” Behavioural Processes 117:97–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laland, Kevin N., Feldman, Marc W., Müller, Gerd B., Jablonka, Eva, Uller, Tobias, Sterelny, Kim, Moczek, Armin, and Odling-Smee, John. 2014. “Does Evolutionary Theory Need a Rethink? Yes, Urgently.” Nature 514 (7521): 161–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehrman, Daniel S. 1970. “Semantic and Conceptual Issues in the Nature-Nurture Problem.” In Development and Evolution of Behavior: Essays in Memory of T. C. Schneirla, ed. Aronson, Lester R., 17–52. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Levis, Nicholas A., and Pfennig, David W.. 2016. “Evaluating ‘Plasticity-First’ Evolution in Nature: Key Criteria and Empirical Approaches.” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 31 (7): 563–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewontin, Richard C. 1970. “The Units of Selection.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1:1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewontin, Richard C.. 1983. “The Organisms as the Subject and Object of Evolution.” Scientia 118:63–82.Google Scholar
Lewontin, Richard C.. 2000. The Triple Helix: Gene, Organism, and Environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Matthen, Mohan, and Ariew, André. 2002. “Two Ways of Thinking about Fitness and Natural Selection.” Journal of Philosophy 99 (2): 55–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millstein, Roberta L. 2009. “Populations as Individuals.” Biological Theory 4 (3): 267–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Conwy L. 1896. Habitat and Instinct. New York: Arnold.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odling-Smee, John, Laland, Kevin N., and Feldman, Marc W.. 2003. Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolutionary Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Okasha, Samir. 2006. Evolution and the Levels of Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborn, Henry F. 1896. “A Mode of Evolution Requiring Neither Natural Selection nor the Inheritance of Acquired Characters.” Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences 15:141–42.Google Scholar
Otsuka, Jun. 2016. “Causal Foundations of Evolutionary Genetics.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (1): 247–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyama, Susan. 2000. The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental Systems and Evolution. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, Jean. 1978. Behavior and Evolution. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Pigliucci, Massimo, and Müller, Gerd B.. 2010. Evolution: The Extended Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, Grant. 2013a. “Can Fitness Differences Be a Cause of Evolution?” Philosophy and Theory in Biology 5:e401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, Grant. 2013b. “Organisms, Traits, and Population Subdivisions: Two Arguments against the Causal Conception of Fitness?” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64:589–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, Grant. 2016. “The Causal Structure of Evolutionary Theory.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94:421–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rondeau, Sylvie L., and Gee, John H.. 2005. “Larval Anurans Adjust Buoyancy in Response to Substrate Ingestion.” Copeia 1:188–95.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Alexander. 1983. “Fitness.” Journal of Philosophy 80 (8): 457–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott-Phillips, Thomas C., Laland, Kevin N., Shuker, David M., Dickins, Thomas E., and West, Stuart A.. 2014. “The Niche Construction Perspective: A Critical Appraisal.” Evolution 68 (5): 1231–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simpson, George G. 1953. “The Baldwin Effect.” Evolution 7:110–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, Elliot. 1984. The Nature of Selection: Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sultan, Sonia. E. 2015. Organism and Environment: Ecological Development, Niche Construction, and Adaptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, Denis. M. 2010. “Not a Sure Thing: Fitness Probability, and Causation.” Philosophy of Science 77 (2): 147–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, Denis. M.. 2015. Organisms, Agency, and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, John J. 2017. “What’s Wrong with Evolutionary Biology?” Biology and Philosophy 32 (2): 263–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
West-Eberhard, Mary J. 2003. Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, George C. 1966. Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wings, Oliver. 2007. “A Review of Gastrolith Function with Implications for Fossil Vertebrates and a Revised Classification.” Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 52 (1): 1–16.Google Scholar
Wray, Gregory A., Hoekstra, Hopi E., Futuyma, Douglas J., Lenski, Richard E., Mackay, Trudy F. C., Schluter, Dolph, and Strassmann, Joan E.. 2014. “Does Evolutionary Theory Need a Rethink? No, All Is Well.” Nature 514:161–64.Google Scholar