Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-mmrw7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-09T00:03:03.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evolution and Constraints on Variation: Variant Specification and Range of Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Trevor Pearce
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There is still a great deal of debate over what counts as a constraint and about how to assess experimentally the relative importance of constraints and selection in evolutionary history. I will argue that the notion of a constraint on variation, and thus the selection-constraint distinction, depends on two specifications: (1) what counts as a variant—constraints limit or bias the production of what? and (2) range of assessment—over what range of times or conditions is the variation assessed? Specifications 1 and 2 help us to understand empirical work on the relative importance of constraint and selection in evolution.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 78 , Issue 5 , December 2011 , pp. 739 - 751
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

‡

I thank David Jablonski, William Wimsatt, Leigh Van Valen, Robert Richards, Chris Diteresi, Beckett Sterner, Bill Sterner, and participants in the University of Chicago Philosophy of Biology discussion group for reading and commenting on earlier drafts of this article. I also received helpful feedback from audiences at ISHPSSB 2009 and PSA 2010.

References

Alberch, Pere. 1982. “Developmental Constraints in Evolutionary Processes.” In Evolution and Development: Report of the Dahlem Workshop on Evolution and Development, Berlin 1981, May 10–15, ed. Bonner, J. T. and Dawid, I. B., 313–32. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. McNeill. 1985. “The Ideal and the Feasible: Physical Constraints on Evolution.” Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 26:345–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Cerisse E., Beldade, Patrícia, Zwaan, Bas J., and Brakefield, Paul M.. 2008. “Differences in the Selection Response of Serially Repeated Color Pattern Characters: Standing Variation, Development, and Evolution.” BMC Evolutionary Biology 8, http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/8/94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amundson, Ron. 1994. “Two Concepts of Constraint: Adaptationism and the Challenge from Developmental Biology.” Philosophy of Science 61 (December): 556–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonovics, Janis, and van Tienderen, Peter H.. 1991. “Ontoecogenophyloconstraints? The Chaos of Constraint Terminology.” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6 (May): 166–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnold, Stevan J. 1992. “Constraints on Phenotypic Evolution.” American Naturalist 140 (November): S85–S107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beatty, John. 2006. “Replaying Life's Tape.” Journal of Philosophy 93 (July): 336–62.Google Scholar
Beldade, Patrícia, and Brakefield, Paul M.. 2003. “The Difficulty of Agreeing about Constraints.” Evolution and Development 5 (March/April): 119–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beldade, Patrícia, Brakefield, Paul M., and Long, Anthony D.. 2005. “Generating Phenotypic Variation: Prospects from ‘Evo-Devo’ Research on Bicyclus anynana Wing Patterns.” Evolution and Development 7 (March/April): 101–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beldade, Patrícia, Koops, Kees, and Brakefield, Paul M.. 2002. “Developmental Constraints versus Flexibility in Morphological Evolution.” Nature 416 (April 25): 844–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brakefield, Paul M. 2003. “The Power of Evo-Devo to Explore Evolutionary Constraints: Experiments with Butterfly Eyespots.” Zoology 106:283–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brakefield, Paul M.. 2006. “Evo-Devo and Constraints on Selection.” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21 (July): 362–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brakefield, Paul M., and Joron, Mathieu. 2010. “The Flexibility of Butterfly Wing Color Patterns and Evolution in Morphospace.” In In Search of the Causes of Evolution: From Field Observations to Mechanisms, ed. Grant, P. R. and Grant, B. R.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brakefield, Paul M., and Roskam, J. C.. 2006. “Exploring Evolutionary Constraints Is a Task for an Integrative Evolutionary Biology.” American Naturalist 168 (December): S4–S13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erwin, Douglas H. 2007. “Disparity: Morphological Pattern and Developmental Context.” Palaeontology 50 (January): 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankino, W. Anthony, Zwaan, Bas J., Stern, David L., and Brakefield, Paul M.. 2005. “Natural Selection and Developmental Constraints in the Evolution of Allometries.” Science 307 (February 4): 718–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frankino, W. Anthony, Zwaan, Bas J., Stern, David L., and Brakefield, Paul M.. 2007. “Internal and External Constraints in the Evolution of Morphological Allometries in a Butterfly.” Evolution 61 (December): 2958–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavrilets, Sergey. 1999. “Dynamics of Clade Diversification on the Morphological Hypercube.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 266 (April 22): 817–24.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1989. “A Developmental Constraint in Cerion, with Comments on the Definition and Interpretation of Constraint in Evolution.” Evolution 43 (May): 516–39.Google Scholar
Grantham, Todd A. 2004. “Constraints and Spandrels in Gould's Structure of Evolutionary Theory.” Biology and Philosophy 19 (January): 29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kodandaramaiah, Ullasa. 2009. “Eyespot Evolution: Phylogenetic Insights from Junonia and Related Butterfly Genera (Nymphalidae: Junoniini).” Evolution and Development 11 (September/October): 489–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaBarbera, Michael C. 2003. “The Biology of B-Movie Monsters.” Fathom Archive, http://fathom.lib.uchicago.edu/2/21701757/.Google Scholar
Lewin, Roger. 1980. “Evolutionary Theory under Fire.” Science 210 (November 21): 883–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewontin, Richard C. 2003. “Four Complications in Understanding the Evolutionary Process.” Santa Fe Institute Bulletin 18, http://www.santafe.edu/research/publications/sfi-bulletin/.Google Scholar
Maclaurin, James. 2003. “The Good, the Bad and the Impossible.” Biology and Philosophy 18 (June): 463–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclaurin, James, and Sterelny, Kim. 2008. What Is Biodiversity? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, John, Burian, Richard, Kauffman, Stuart A., Alberch, Pere, Campbell, John, Goodwin, Brian, Lande, Russell, Raup, David, and Wolpert, Lewis. 1985. “Developmental Constraints and Evolution.” Quarterly Review of Biology 60 (September): 265–87.Google Scholar
Millstein, Roberta L. 2000. “Chance and Macroevolution.” Philosophy of Science 67 (December): 603–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neander, Karen. 1995. “Explaining Complex Adaptations: A Reply to Sober's ‘Reply to Neander.’” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46:583–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oster, George, and Alberch, Pere. 1982. “Evolution and the Bifurcation of Developmental Programs.” Evolution 36 (May): 444–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peña, Carlos, Wahlberg, Niklas, Weingartner, Elisabet, Kodandaramaiah, Ullasa, Nylin, Sören, Freitas, André V. L., and Brower, Andrew V. Z.. 2006. “Higher Level Phylogeny of Satyrinae Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) Based on DNA Sequence Data.” Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 40 (July): 29–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pie, Marcio R., and Weitz, Joshua S.. 2005. “A Null Model of Morphospace Occupation.” American Naturalist 166 (July): E1–E13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prud’homme, Benjamin, Minervino, Caroline, Hocine, Mélanie, Cande, Jessica D., Aouane, Aïcha, Dufour, Héloïse D., Kassner, Victoria A., and Gompel, Nicolas. 2011. “Body Plan Innovation in Treehoppers through the Evolution of an Extra Wing-like Appendage.” Nature 473 (May 5): 83–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saenko, Suzanne V., French, Vernon, Brakefield, Paul M., and Beldade, Patrícia. 2008. “Conserved Developmental Processes and the Formation of Evolutionary Novelties: Examples from Butterfly Wings.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 363 (April 27): 1549–55.Google ScholarPubMed
Sansom, Roger. 2009. “The Nature of Developmental Constraints and the Difference-Maker Argument for Externalism.” Biology and Philosophy 24 (September): 441–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlosser, Gerhard. 2007. “Functional and Developmental Constraints on Life-Cycle Evolution: An Attempt on the Architecture of Constraints.” In Integrating Evolution and Development: From Theory to Practice, ed. Sansom, R. and Brandon, R. N.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schwenk, Kurt. 1995. “A Utilitarian Approach to Evolutionary Constraint.” Zoology 98:251–62.Google Scholar
Schwenk, Kurt, and Wagner, Günter P.. 2003. “Constraint.” In Keywords and Concepts in Evolutionary Developmental Biology, ed. Hall, B. K. and Olson, W. M., 52–61. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schwenk, Kurt, and Wagner, Günter P.. 2004. “The Relativism of Constraints on Phenotypic Evolution.” In Phenotypic Integration: Studying the Ecology and Evolution of Complex Phenotypes, ed. Pigliucci, M. and Preston, K., 390–408. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shanahan, Timothy. 2008. “Why Don’t Zebras Have Machine Guns? Adaptation, Selection, and Constraints in Evolutionary Theory.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39 (March): 135–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wimsatt, William C. 1986. “Developmental Constraints, Generative Entrenchment and the Innate-Acquired Distinction.” In Integrating Scientific Disciplines, ed. Bechtel, W., 185–208. Dordrecht: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, Bas J., Zijlstra, Wilte G., Keller, Marieke, Pijpe, Jeroen, and Brakefield, Paul M.. 2008. “Potential Constraints on Evolution: Sexual Dimorphism and the Problem of Protandry in the Butterfly Bicyclus anynana.” Journal of Genetics 87 (December): 395–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed