Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768dbb666b-6zkrn Total loading time: 0.473 Render date: 2023-02-07T01:16:46.378Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Germs, Genes, and Memes: Function and Fitness Dynamics on Information Networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Abstract

Understanding the dynamics of information is crucial to many areas of research, both inside and outside of philosophy. Using computer simulations of three kinds of information, germs, genes, and memes, we show that the mechanism of information transfer often swamps network structure in terms of its effects on both the dynamics and the fitness of the information. This insight has both obvious and subtle implications for a number of questions in philosophy, including questions about the nature of information, whether there is genetic information, and how to arrange scientific communities.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This work was supported in part by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences MIDAS grant 1U54GM088491-01, Computational Models of Infectious Disease Threats, administered by the Graduate School for Public Health at the University of Pittsburgh. We are also thankful to many audiences for their feedback on this work, particularly Michael Weisberg’s Philosophy of Science Lab at the University of Pennsylvania. Patrick Grim and Daniel J. Singer contributed equally to this research.

References

Acemoglu, D., Como, G., Fagnani, F., and Ozdaglar, A. E. 2012. “Opinion Fluctuations and Disagreement in Social Networks.” Mathematics of Operations Research 38 (1): 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achrol, R. S., and Kotler, P. 1999. “Marketing in the Network Economy.” Journal of Marketing 63:146–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adriaans, P., and van Bentham, J. F. A. K., eds. 2008. Handbook of Philosophy of Information. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Alexander, J. 2007. The Structural Evolution of Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, J. 2013. “Preferential Attachment and the Search for Successful Theories.” Philosophy of Science 80 (5): 769–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, J., and Skyrms, B. 1999. “Bargaining with Neighbors: Is Justice Contagious?Journal of Philosophy 96:588–98.Google Scholar
Asch, S. 1952. Social Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asch, S. 1955. “Opinions and Social Pressure.” Scientific American 193:3135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, M. M., and Coleman, W. D. 1992. “Policy Networks, Policy Communication and the Problems of Governance.” Governance 5:154–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barabási, A.-L., and Albert, R. 1999. “Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks.” Science 286:509–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bendor, Jonathan, and Swistak, Piotr. 2001. “The Evolution of Norms.” American Journal of Sociology 106:1493–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bicchieri, C. 2006. The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bindel, D., Kleinberg, J. M., and Oren, S. 2011. “How Bad Is Forming Your Own Opinion?” In Proc. 52nd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, ed. Ostrovsky, R., 5766. Palm Springs, CA: IEEE.Google Scholar
Blackmore, S. 2000. The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blumer, H. 1951. “Collective Behavior.” In Principles of Sociology, ed. Lee, A. M., 67121. New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
Lee, A. M. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bond, R., and Smith, P. B. 1996. “Culture and Conformity: A Meta-analysis of Studies Using Asch’s Line Judgment Task.” Psychological Bulletin 119:111–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börner, K., Maru, J. T., and Goldstone, R. L. 2004. “The Simultaneous Evolution of Author and Paper Networks.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101 (Supp. 1): 5266–73.Google ScholarPubMed
Brodie, R. 1996. Virus of the Mind: The New Science of the Meme. Seattle: Integral.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, S., Lloyd-Price, J., Smolander, O.-P., Baici, W. C. V., Hughes, T. R., Yli-Harja, O., Chua, G., and Ribeiro, A. S. 2010. “Information Propagation within the Genetic Network of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.” Systems Biology 4:143.Google ScholarPubMed
Cialdini, R. B., and Goldstein, N. J. 2004. “Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity.” Annual Review of Psychology 55:591621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Czaplicka, A., Holyst, J. A., and Sloot, P. M. 2013. “Noise Enhances Information Transfer in Hierarchical Networks.” Scientific Reports 3 (1223).Google ScholarPubMed
Dandekar, P., Goel, A., and Lee, D. T. 2013. “Biased Assimilation, Homophily, and the Dynamics of Polarization.” Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences 110 (15): 5791–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danon, L., Arenas, A., and Díaz-Guilera, A. 2008. “Impact of Community Structure on Information Transfer.” Physical Review E 77 (3): 036103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawkins, R. 1976. The Selfish Gene. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. 1993. “Viruses of the Mind.” In Dennett and His Critics: Demystifying Mind, ed. Dalhbom, Bo. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1993.Google Scholar
DeGroot, M. H. 1974. “Reaching a Consensus.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 69:118–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMarzo, P., Vayanos, D., and Zwiebel, J. 2003. “Persuasion Bias, Social Influence, and Uni-dimensional Opinions.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118:909–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. 1991. Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
De Tarde, G. 1903. The Laws of Imitation. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Easley, D., and Kleinberg, J. 2010. Networks, Crowds and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floridi, L., ed. 2003. The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ed 2011. The Philosophy of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, L. C. 1978. “Segregation in Social Networks.” Sociological Methods and Research 6:411–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, J. 1956. “A Formal Theory of Social Power.” Psychological Review 63:181–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedkin, N. E., and Johnsen, E. C. 1990. “Social Influence and Opinions.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 15:193206.Google Scholar
Germano, R., and de Moura, A. P. 2006. “Traffic of Particles in Complex Networks.” Physical Review E 74 (3): 036117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gladwell, M. 2000. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. I. 1999. Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golub, B., and Jackson, M. O. 2010. “Naïve Learning in Social Networks: Convergence, Influence, and the Wisdom of Crowds.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 2:112–49.Google Scholar
Golub, B., and Jackson, M. O. 2011. “Network Structure and the Speed of Learning: Measuring Homophily Based on Its Consequences.” Annals of Economics and Statistics. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1784542.Google Scholar
Golub, B., and Jackson, M. O. 2012. “How Homophily Affects the Speed of Learning and Best Response Dynamics.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 127 (3): 1287–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, A. W. 1999. “Network Effects in Marketing.” Marketing Research 11 (3): 36.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Paul E. 2001. “Genetic Information: A Metaphor in Search of a Theory.” Philosophy of Science 68 (3): 394412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grim, P. 2009. “Threshold Phenomena in Epistemic Networks.” In Proceedings, AAAI Fall Symposium on Complex Adaptive Systems and the Threshold Effect. FS-09-03, AAAI Press.Google Scholar
Grim, P., Bramson, A., Singer, D. J., Fisher, S., Flocken, C., and Berger, W. 2012a. “Philosophical Analysis in Modeling Polarization: Notes from a Work in Progress.” American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers 12:715.Google Scholar
Grim, P., Reade, C., Singer, D. J., Fisher, S., and Majewicz, S. 2010a. “Robustness across the Structure of Sub-networks: The Contrast between Infection and Information Dynamics.” In Proceedings, AAAI Symposium on Complex Adaptive Systems: Resilience, Robustness and Evolvability. FS-10-03, AAAI Press.Google Scholar
Reade, C., Singer, D. J., Fisher, S., and Majewicz, S. 2010b. “What You Believe Travels Differently: Information and Infection Dynamics across Sub-networks.” Connections 30:5063.Google Scholar
Grim, P., Singer, D. J., Fisher, S., Bramson, A., Berger, W. J., Reade, C., Flocken, C., and Sales, A. 2013. “Scientific Networks on Data Landscapes: Question Difficulty, Epistemic Success, and Convergence.” Episteme 10:441–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grim, P., Thomas, S. B., Fisher, S., Reade, C., Singer, D., Garz, M. A., Fryer, C. S., and Chatman, J. 2012b. “Polarization and Belief Dynamics in the Black and White Communities: An Agent-Based Network Model from the Data.” Artificial Life 13:186–93.Google Scholar
Gross, T., D’Lima, C. J. D., and Blasius, B. 2006. “Epidemic Dynamics on an Adaptive Network.” Physical Review Letters 96 (20): 208701.Google Scholar
Handegard, N. O., Leblanc, S., Boswell, K., Tjostheim, D., and Couzin, I. D. 2012. “The Dynamics of Coordinated Group Hunting and Collective Information-Transfer among Schooling Prey.” Current Biology 22 (13): 1213–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harary, F. 1959. “A Criterion for Unanimity in French’s Theory of Social Power.” In Studies in Social Power, ed. Cartwright, D. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. A., Mullen, P. D., and Green, L. W. 1992. “A Meta-analysis of Studies of the Health Belief Model.” Health Education Research 7:107–16.Google ScholarPubMed
Hawe, P., and Potkin, L., 2009. “What Is Population Health Intervention Research?Canadian Journal of Public Health 11 (1): I8I14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegselmann, R., and Krause, U. 2002. “Opinion Dynamics and Bounded Confidence Models, Analysis, and Simulation.” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 5 (3). http://www.jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/5/3/2.html.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Douglas R. 1983. “Artificial Intelligence: Subcognition as Computation.” In The Study of Information: Interdisciplinary Messages, ed. Machlup, Fritz. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Holland, J. 2012. Signals and Boundaries. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M. O., and Rogers, B. W. 2007. “Relating Network Structure to Diffusion Properties through Stochastic Dominance.” BE Journal of Theoretical Economics 7 (1): 116.Google Scholar
Janz, N. K., and Becker, M. H. 1984. “The Health Belief Model: A Decade Later.” Health Education Quarterly 11 (1): 147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitcher, Philip. 1990. “The Division of Cognitive Labor.” Journal of Philosophy 87 (1): 522.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip 1993. The Advancement of Science. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krause, U. 2000. “A Discrete Nonlinear and Non-autonomous Model of Consensus Formation.” In Communications in Difference Equations, ed. Elaydi, S., Ladas, G., Popenda, J., and Rakowski, J., 227–36. Amsterdam: Gordon & Breach.Google Scholar
Le Bon, G. 1897. The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lynch, A. 1996. Thought Contagion: How Belief Spreads through Society. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. 2000. “The Concept of Information in Biology.” Philosophy of Science 67 (2): 177–94.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J., and Szathmáry, E. 1995. The Major Transitions in Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mullen, P. D., Hersey, J., and Iverson, D. C. 1987. “Health Behavior Models Compared.” Social Science and Medicine 24:973–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nekovee, M., Moreno, Y., Bianconi, G., and Marsili, M. 2007. “Theory of Rumour Spreading in Complex Social Networks.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 374 (1): 457–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, M. E. 2001. “The Structure of Scientific Collaboration Networks.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98 (2): 404–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, M. E., and Watts, D. J. 1999. “Scaling and Percolation in the Small-World Network Model.” Physical Review E 60 (6): 7332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, Robert. 1904. Masse und Publikum. Berlin: Lack & Grunau.Google Scholar
Park, Robert E., and Burgess, Ernest W. 1921. “Collective Behavior.” In Introduction to the Science of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pautasso, M., and Jeger, M. J. 2008. “Epidemic Threshold and Network Structure: The Interplay of Probability of Transmission and of Persistence in Small-Size Directed Networks.” Ecological Complexity 5 (1): 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, J. 2003. “Policy Networks.” http://www.ihs.ac.at/publications/pol/pw_90.pdf.Google Scholar
Strandburg-Peshkin, A., et al. 2013. “Visual Sensory Networks and Effective Information Transfer in Animal Groups.” Current Biology 23 (17): R70911.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strecher, V. J., and Rosenstock, I. M. 1997. “The Health Belief Model.” In Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice, ed. Glanz, K., Lewis, F. M., and Rimer, B. K. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Strevens, M. 2003. “The Role of the Priority Rule in Science.” Journal of Philosophy 100:5579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, J., Liu, B., Li, Q., and Ma, H. 2014. “Coevolution of Opinions and Directed Adaptive Networks in a Social Group.” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 17 (2): 4. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/17/2/4.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanenbaum, A. S. 2006. Computer Networks. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
Trotter, R. T. II, Rothenberg, R. B., and Coyle, S. 1995. “Drug Abuse and HIV Prevention Research: Expanding Paradigms and Network Contributions to Risk Reduction.” Connections 18 (1): 2945.Google Scholar
Valente, T. W. 1995. Network Models of the Diffusion of Innovation. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.Google Scholar
Wang, X. F., and Chen, G. 2003. “Complex Networks: Small-World, Scale-Free and Beyond.” Circuits and Systems Magazine, IEEE 3 (1): 620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, M. 2007. “Three Kinds of Idealization.” Journal of Philosophy 104 (12): 639–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, M., and Muldoon, R. 2009. “Epistemic Landscapes and the Division of Cognitive Labor.” Philosophy of Science 76 (2): 225–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooldridge, M. 2002. An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Zollman, K. J. S. 2007. “The Communication Structure of Epistemic Communities.” Philosophy of Science 74 (5): 574–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zollman, K. J. S. 2010. “The Epistemic Benefit of Transient Diversity.” Erkenntnis 72 (1): 1735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zollman, K. J. S. 2013. “Network Epistemology: Communication in Epistemic Communities.” Philosophy Compass 8 (1): 1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Germs, Genes, and Memes: Function and Fitness Dynamics on Information Networks
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Germs, Genes, and Memes: Function and Fitness Dynamics on Information Networks
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Germs, Genes, and Memes: Function and Fitness Dynamics on Information Networks
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *