Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-mm7gn Total loading time: 0.354 Render date: 2022-08-11T12:32:09.399Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Huygens on Inertial Structure and Relativity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Abstract

I explain and assess here Huygens’s concept of relative motion. I show that it allows him to ground most of the Law of Inertia and also to explain rotation. Thereby his concept obviates the need for Newton’s absolute space. Thus, his account is a powerful foundation for mechanics, although not without some tension.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

For deeply illuminating exchanges, I am greatly indebted to Nick Huggett, Katherine Brading, and Robert Rynasiewicz. For stimulating, constructive discussions, I am grateful to Alan Love, George E. Smith, Peter Distelzweig, David Marshall Miller, Ed Slowik, and Victor Boantza. For helpful feedback, I thank audiences at the University of Minnesota and the Max Planck Institute for History of Science.

References

Alexander, H. G., ed. 1970. The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence. New York: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
Barbour, J. 2001. The Discovery of Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Borelli, G. A. 1667. De vi percussionis. Bologna.Google Scholar
Boulliau, I. 1645. Astronomia Philolaica. Paris.Google Scholar
Chareix, F. 2006. La philosophie naturelle de Christiaan Huygens. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. 1644. Principia philosophiae. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
[du Châtelet, E. 1740. Institutions de physique. Paris.Google Scholar
Earman, J. 1989. World Enough and Space-Time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Euler, L. 1736. Mechanica. Bk. 1. St. Petersburg.Google Scholar
Euler, L. 1765. Theoria motus corporum solidorum seu rigidorum. Rostock.Google Scholar
Fabri, H. 1646. Tractatus physicus de motu locali. ed. Mousnier, P.. Lyon.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 2013. Kant’s Construction of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garber, D. 1992. Descartes’ Metaphysical Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gassendi, P. 1675. Institutio astronomica. 5th ed. London.Google Scholar
Horrocks, J. 1678. “Astronomia Kepleriana, defensa et promota.” In Opera posthuma, 1–239. London.Google Scholar
Huygens, C. 1728. Opera reliqua. Vol. 2. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Huygens, C. 1888–1950. Oeuvres complètes. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Lansberg, P. 1651. Commentationes in motum terrae. Middelburg.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 2001. The Labyrinth of the Continuum. ed. and trans. Arthur, R. T. W.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mariotte, E. 1740. “Traité de la percussion ou Choc des Corps” (1679). In Oeuvres de M. Mariotte, vol. 1. The Hague.Google Scholar
Mormino, G. 1993. Penetralia Motus: La fondazione relativistica della meccanica in C. Huygens, con l’edizione del Codex Hugeniorum 7A. Florence: Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Newton, I. 1684–85. De motu corporum in mediis regulariter cedentibus. MS Add. 3965.5, Cambridge University Library. The Newton Project. http://www.newtonproject.sussex.ac.uk/view/texts/normalized/NATP00091.Google Scholar
Newton, I. 1687. Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riccioli, G. B. 1651. Almagestum novum. Vol. 1, pt. 2. Bologna.Google Scholar
Rynasiewicz, R. 2000. “On the Distinction between Absolute and Relative Motion.” Philosophy of Science 67:7093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schliesser, E., and Smith, G. E.. Forthcoming. “Huygens’s 1688 Report to the Directors of the Dutch East India Company on the Measurement of Longitude at Sea and the Evidence It Offered against Universal Gravity.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences.Google Scholar
Stan, M. 2015. “Absolute Space and the Riddle of Rotation: Kant’s Response to Newton.” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, Vol. 7, ed. Daniel Garber and Donald Rutherford, 257–308. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stein, H. 1977. “Some Philosophical Prehistory of General Relativity.” In Foundations of Space-Time Theories, ed. Earman, John, Glymour, Clark N., and Stachel, John J., 349. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Vilain, C. 1996. La mécanique de Christian Huygens. Paris: Blanchard.Google Scholar
Wren, C. 1668. “Lex naturae de collisione corporum.” Philosophical Transactions 4:867–68.Google Scholar
3
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Huygens on Inertial Structure and Relativity
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Huygens on Inertial Structure and Relativity
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Huygens on Inertial Structure and Relativity
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *