Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-tfzs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-27T05:09:53.673Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Newton Did Change His Views from Certainty to Probability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Alan E. Shapiro
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Kirsten Walsh has criticized my interpretation of Newton’s view on the certainty of his new science of color, namely, that it shifted through his long career from one of certainty to probabilism. I defend my view by further considering his statements on certainty in his Optical Lectures, “New Theory about Light and Colors,” Query 31 of the Opticks, and Rule 4 added to the Principia in 1726.

Information

Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 88 , Issue 1 , January 2021 , pp. 169 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

†

I thank Zwi Biener for assisting me in understanding Newton’s concept of induction and for other useful comments and suggestions. The comments of two anonymous reviewers helped me clarify my argument.

References

Biener, Zvi. 2018. “Newton’s Regulae Philosophandi.” In The Oxford Handbook of Newton, ed. Schliesser, Eric and Smeenk, Chris. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Birch, Thomas, ed. 1756–57/1968. The History of the Royal Society of London, for Improving of Natural Knowledge, from Its First Rise. 4 vols. Repr. Brussels: Culture et Civilisation.Google Scholar
Buchwald, Jed Z., and Feingold, Mordechai. 2013. Newton and the Origin of Civilization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. Bernard. 1971. Introduction to Newton’s ‘Principia’. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dear, Peter. 1995. Discipline and Experience: The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution. Chicago: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ducheyne, Steffen. 2012. The Main Business of Natural Philosophy: Isaac Newton’s Natural-Philosophical Methodology. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guicciardini, Niccolò. 2009. Isaac Newton on Mathematical Certainty and Method. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, Isaac. 1952. Opticks; or, A Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflexions and Colours of Light: Based on the 4th ed., London, 1730. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac. 1959–77. The Correspondence of Isaac Newton. Ed. H. W. Turnbull, J. F. Scott, A. Rupert Hall, and Laura Tilling, 7 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, Isaac. 1981. The Mathematical Papers of Isaac Newton. Vol. 8, ed. D. T. Whiteside. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac. 1984. The Optical Papers of Isaac Newton. Vol. 1, The Optical Lectures, 1670–1672. Ed. Alan E. Shapiro. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac. 1999. The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Trans. Cohen, I. Bernard, Whitman, Anne, and Budenz, Julia. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pulte, Helmut. 2019. “‘Tis Much Better to Do a Little with Certainty’: On the Reception of Newton’s Methodology.” In The Reception of Isaac Newton in Europe, Vol. 2, ed. Pulte, Helmut and Mandelbrote, Scott, 355–84. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Alan E. 1984. “Experiment and Mathematics in Newton’s Theory of Color.” Physics Today 37 (9): 34–42..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Alan E.. 1993. Fits, Passions, and Paroxysms: Physics, Method, and Chemistry and Newton’s Theories of Colored Bodies and Fits of Easy Reflection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Alan E.. 2004. “Newton’s ‘Experimental Philosophy.’” Early Science and Medicine 9:185–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, George E. 2002. “The Methodology of the Principia.” In The Cambridge Companion to Newton, ed. Cohen, I. Bernard and Smith, George E., 138–73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, George E.. 2012. “How Newton’s Principia Changed Physics.” In Interpreting Newton: Critical Essays, ed. Janiak, Andrew and Schliesser, Eric, 360–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walsh, Kirsten. 2017. “Newton: From Certainty to Probability?” Philosophy of Science 84:866–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westfall, Richard S. 1980. Never at Rest: A Biography of Isaac Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar