Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
Login Alert
Cancel
Log in
×
×
Home
  • Home
  • Log in
  • Register
  • Browse subjects
  • Publications
  • Open research
  • Services
  • About Cambridge Core
  • Cart
  • Cart
  • Institution login
  • Register
  • Log in
  • Cart
Cited by
  • Crossref logo 9
  • Google Scholar logo
Crossref Citations
Crossref logo
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Schurz, Gerhard and Hertwig, Ralph 2019. Cognitive Success: A Consequentialist Account of Rationality in Cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, Vol. 11, Issue. 1, p. 7.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Sterkenburg, Tom F. 2020. THE META-INDUCTIVE JUSTIFICATION OF INDUCTION. Episteme, Vol. 17, Issue. 4, p. 519.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Schurz, Gerhard and Thorn, Paul 2020. The material theory of object-induction and the universal optimality of meta-induction: Two complementary accounts. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Vol. 82, Issue. , p. 88.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Schurz, Gerhard 2021. Erkenntnistheorie. p. 209.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Schurz, Gerhard 2021. Metainduction over Unboundedly Many Prediction Methods: A Reply to Arnold and Sterkenburg. Philosophy of Science, Vol. 88, Issue. 2, p. 320.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Schurz, Gerhard 2021. THE NO FREE LUNCH THEOREM: BAD NEWS FOR (WHITE'S ACCOUNT OF) THE PROBLEM OF INDUCTION. Episteme, Vol. 18, Issue. 1, p. 31.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Sterkenburg, Tom F. and Grünwald, Peter D. 2021. The no-free-lunch theorems of supervised learning. Synthese, Vol. 199, Issue. 3-4, p. 9979.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Bargagli Stoffi, Falco J. Cevolani, Gustavo and Gnecco, Giorgio 2022. Simple Models in Complex Worlds: Occam’s Razor and Statistical Learning Theory. Minds and Machines, Vol. 32, Issue. 1, p. 13.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Rushing, Bruce 2022. No free theory choice from machine learning. Synthese, Vol. 200, Issue. 5,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Google Scholar Citations

View all Google Scholar citations for this article.

×
  • Librarians
  • Authors
  • Publishing partners
  • Agents
  • Corporates
  • Additional Information
    • Accessibility
    • Our blog
    • News
    • Contact and help
    • Cambridge Core legal notices
    • Feedback
    • Sitemap
    US
    Join us online
  • Legal Information
    • Cambridge University Press
    • Rights & Permissions
    • Copyright
    • Privacy Notice
    • Terms of use
    • Cookies Policy
    • © Cambridge University Press 2023
    • Back to top
  • © Cambridge University Press 2023
  • Back to top

Cancel
Confirm
×

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

No Free Lunch Theorem, Inductive Skepticism, and the Optimality of Meta-induction
  • Volume 84, Issue 5
  • Gerhard Schurz
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/693929
Please provide your Kindle email.
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

No Free Lunch Theorem, Inductive Skepticism, and the Optimality of Meta-induction
  • Volume 84, Issue 5
  • Gerhard Schurz
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/693929
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

No Free Lunch Theorem, Inductive Skepticism, and the Optimality of Meta-induction
  • Volume 84, Issue 5
  • Gerhard Schurz
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/693929
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Contents help
Close Contents help

- No HTML tags allowed
- Web page URLs will display as text only
- Lines and paragraphs break automatically
- Attachments, images or tables are not permitted

Please enter your response.

Your details

Email help
Close Email help

Your email address will be used in order to notify you when your comment has been reviewed by the moderator and in case the author(s) of the article or the moderator need to contact you directly.

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? * Conflicting interests help

Close Conflicting interests help

Please list any fees and grants from, employment by, consultancy for, shared ownership in or any close relationship with, at any time over the preceding 36 months, any organisation whose interests may be affected by the publication of the response. Please also list any non-financial associations or interests (personal, professional, political, institutional, religious or other) that a reasonable reader would want to know about in relation to the submitted work. This pertains to all the authors of the piece, their spouses or partners.