Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-g8tfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T10:26:22.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Concept of a System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

J. H. Marchal
J. H. Marchal*
Affiliation:
Weber State College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The area of investigation known as general systems theory or research features the study of systems as interesting in its own right or one fruitful approach to the study of science in general. This leads to an interesting and still open problem, namely, explicating the concept of a system that seems to unify the interests of researchers in this area. Contrary to received opinion, I argue that there is a unique and interesting concept of a system that underlies the expressed interests of general systems researchers and that it can be given a satisfactory explication. The concept in question has systems as extralinguistic entities that we theorize about, namely, certain sorts of sets of re-related elements. Criteria for its explication are suggested; examples of systems, earlier analyses, and various objections are all considered in leading up to a partial formal explication of the concept and a statement of additional open problems.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , December 1975 , pp. 448 - 468
Copyright
Copyright © 1975 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ackoff, R. L. “Games, Decisions and Organizations.” In General Systems. Vol. IV. Edited by Bertalanffy, L. von and Rapoport, A. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Ackoff, R. L. “General Systems Theory and Systems Research: Contrasting Conceptions of Systems Science.” In Views on Generals Systems Theory. Edited by Mesarovic, M. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1964.Google Scholar
Ackoff, R. L. “Systems, Organization and Interdisciplinary Research.” In Systems Research and Design. Edited by Eckman, D. P. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1961.Google Scholar
Bertalanffy, L. von. “An Outline of General Systems Theory.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science I (1950): 134–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertalanffy, L. von. “General Systems Theory.” In General Systems. Vol. I. Edited by Bertalanffy, L. von and Rapoport, A. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Bertalanffy, L. von. General Systems Theory. New York: George Braziller, 1969.Google Scholar
Bertalanffy, L. von. “The Theory of Open Systems in Physics and Biology.” Science III (1950): 23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertalanffy, L. von. “Zu einer allgemeinen Systemleher.” Biologia Generalis 19 (1949): 114–129.Google Scholar
Boulding, K. “General Systems as a Point of View.” In Views on General Systems Theory. Edited by Mesarovic, M. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1964.Google Scholar
Buck, R. C. “On the Logic of General Behavioral Systems.” In Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. I. Edited by Feigl, H. and Scriven, M. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Buckley, W. Sociology and Modern Systems Theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1967.Google Scholar
Churchman, C. W. “On Whole Systems.” Internal Working Paper No. 31. Space Science Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, 1965.Google Scholar
Churchman, C. W., Ackoff, R., and Arnoff, L. Operations Research. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1957.Google Scholar
Easton, D. A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1965.Google Scholar
Feferman, S. The Number Systems. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1964.Google Scholar
Garfield, S. L. Introduction to Clinical Psychology. New York: The MacMillian Company, 1957.Google Scholar
Gerard, R. W. “A Biologist's View of Society.” In General Systems. Vol. I. Edited by Bertalanffy, L. von and Rapoport, A. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Hall, A. D. and Fagen, R. E. “Definitions of System.” In General Systems. Vol. I. Edited by Bertalanffy, L. von and Rapoport, A. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Hardin, G. “The Cybernetics of Competion: A Biologist's View of Society.” In Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist. Edited by Buckley, Walter. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1968.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G. “General Systems Theory: A New Approach to the Unity of Science.” Human Biology 23 (1951): 313–322.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G. “Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science.” In International Encyclopedia of Unified Science. Vol. II. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Howland, D. “Cybernetics and General Systems Theory.” In General Systems. Vol. VIII. Edited by Bertalanffy, L. von and Rapoport, A. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Kingleberger, C. P. International Economics. Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, 1953.Google Scholar
Klir, J. “The General System as a Methodological Tool.” In General Systems. Vol. X. Edited by Bertalanffy, L. von and Rapoport, A. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Laszlo, E. Introduction to Systems Philosophy. New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1972.Google Scholar
Meehan, E. J. Explanation in Social Science: A Systems Paradigm. Homewood, Illinois: The Dorsey Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Millard, N. and King, K. Human Anatomy and Physiology. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company, 1951.Google Scholar
Miller, J. G. “Profits and Problems of Homeostatic Models in the Behavioral Sciences.” In Chicago Behavioral Science Publications. No. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Undated Publication of Papers Read at the American Psychological Association in September, 1953)Google Scholar
Nilson, S. S. “Measurement and Model in the Study of Stability.” In General Systems. Vol. XIV. Edited by Bertalanffy, L. von, Rapoport, A., and Meier, R. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Osgood, C. C. Methods and Theory in Experimental Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Rapoport, A. “Mathematical Aspects of General Systems Analysis.” In General Systems. Vol. XI. Edited by Bertalanffy, L. von and Rapoport, A. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Rapoport, A. “Review of Sociology and Modern Systems Theory.” In General Systems. Vol. XIV. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Rudner, R. S. Philosophy of Social Science. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1966.Google Scholar
Shchedrovitsky, G. P. “Methodological Problems of General Systems Research.” Translated by A. Rapoport. In General Systems. Vol. XI. Edited by Bertalanffy, L. von and Rapoport, A. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. “The Architecture of Complexity.” In General Systems. Vol. X. Edited by Bertalanffy, L. von and Rapoport, A. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Suppes, P. Introduction to Logic. Princeton: Van Nostrand Company, 1957.Google Scholar
Suppes, P. Axiomatic Set Theory. Princeton: D. Van Nostrand Company, 1960.Google Scholar
Toda, M. and Shuford, E. H. Jr. “Logic of Systems: Introduction to a Formal Theory of Structure.” In General Systems. Vol. X. Edited by Bertalanffy, L. von and Rapoport, A. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Wiener, N. Cybernetics. Cambridge: The M.I.T. Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Zermansky, M. W. Heat and Thermodynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1957.Google Scholar