Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T14:07:53.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Practical Value of Biological Information for Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Abstract

Many philosophers are skeptical about the scientific value of the concept of biological information. However, several have recently proposed a more positive view of ascribing information as an exercise in scientific modeling. I argue for an alternative role: guiding empirical data collection for the sake of theorizing about the evolution of semantics. I clarify and expand on Bergstrom and Rosvall’s suggestion of taking a “diagnostic” approach that defines biological information operationally as a procedure for collecting empirical cases. The more recent modeling-based accounts still perpetuate a theory-centric view of scientific concepts, which motivated philosophers’ misplaced skepticism in the first place.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Chris DiTeresi provided pivotal feedback on a late draft of this article. My thanks to Bill Wimsatt, Bob Richards, Ken Waters, Alan Love, Scott Lidgard, and Rosa Cao for their comments and suggestions and to everyone in the philosophy of biology and history and philosophy of science groups at the University of Chicago over the years. Also, thanks to Erin Barringer-Sterner for her lovely help with the design of fig. 2. This research was supported in part by an NSF graduate research fellowship and postdoctoral grant SES-1153114.

References

Alon, Uri. 2007a. An Introduction to Systems Biology: Design Principles of Biological Circuits. Vol. 10. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.Google Scholar
Alon, Uri 2007b. “Network Motifs: Theory and Experimental Approaches.” Nature Reviews Genetics 8 (6): 450–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechtel, William, and Richardson, Robert C. 1993. Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bergstrom, Carl T., and Rosvall, Martin. 2011a. “Response to Commentaries on ‘The Transmission Sense of Information.’Biology and Philosophy 26 (2): 195200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergstrom, Carl T., and Rosvall, Martin 2011b. “The Transmission Sense of Information.” Biology and Philosophy 26 (1): 159–76.Google Scholar
Boogerd, Fred C., Bruggeman, Frank J., Hofmeyr, Jan-Hendrik S., and Westerhoff, Hans V., eds. 2007. Systems Biology: Philosophical Foundations. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy. 1983. How the Laws of Physics Lie. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekel, Erez, Mangan, Shmoolik, and Alon, Uri. 2005. “Environmental Selection of the Feed-Forward Loop Circuit in Gene-Regulation Networks.” Physical Biology 2 (2): 8188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dretske, Fred I. 1981. Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Giere, Ronald N. 1999. Science without Laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 1996. Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter 2000. “On the Theoretical Role of ‘Genetic Coding.’Philosophy of Science 67 (1): 2644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter 2007. “Information in Biology.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology, ed. Hull, David L. and Ruse, Michael E., 103–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael E. 2010. “Senders, Receivers, and Genetic Information: Comments on Bergstrom and Rosvall.” Biology and Philosophy 26 (2): 177–81.Google Scholar
Griesemer, James R. 2012. “Formalization and the Meaning of ‘Theory’ in the Inexact Biological Sciences.” Biological Theory 7 (4): 298310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, Paul Edmund. 2001. “Genetic Information: A Metaphor in Search of a Theory.” Philosophy of Science 68 (3): 394412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, Paul Edmund, and Stotz, Karola. 2013. Genetics and Philosophy: An Introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1983. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonka, Eva. 2002. “Information: Its Interpretation, Its Inheritance, and Its Sharing.” Philosophy of Science 69 (4): 578605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonka, Eva, and Lamb, Marion J.. 2005. Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jantzen, Benjamin, and Danks, David. 2008. “Biological Codes and Topological Causation.” Philosophy of Science 75 (3): 259–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonelli, Sabina, and Ankeny, Rachel A.. 2012. “Re-thinking Organisms: The Impact of Databases on Model Organism Biology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (1): 2936.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, Arnon. 2011. “Information in Biology: A Fictionalist Account.” Noûs 45 (4): 640–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclaurin, James. 2010. “Commentary on ‘The Transmission Sense of Information’ by Carl T. Bergstrom and Martin Rosvall.” Biology and Philosophy 26 (2): 191–94.Google Scholar
Mangan, Shmoolik, and Alon, Uri. 2003. “Structure and Function of the Feed-Forward Loop Network Motif.” Proceedings of the National Academic of Sciences 100 (21): 11980–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mangan, Shmoolik, Zaslaver, Alon, and Alon, Uri. 2003. “The Coherent Feedforward Loop Serves as a Sign-Sensitive Delay Element in Transcription Networks.” Journal of Molecular Biology 334 (2): 197204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maynard Smith, John. 2000. “The Concept of Information in Biology.” Philosophy of Science 67 (2): 177–94.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, John, and Szathmary, Eors. 1995. The Major Transitions in Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mayo, Deborah G. 1996. Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, Ruth Garrett. 1984. Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Millikan, Ruth Garrett 2004. Varieties of Meaning: The 2002 Jean Nicod Lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Mary S., and Morrison, Margaret, eds. 1999. Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Malley, Maureen A. 2011. “Exploration, Iterativity, and Kludging in Synthetic Biology.” Comptes Rendus Chimie 14 (4): 406–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyama, Susan. 2000. The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental Systems and Evolution. 2nd ed. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Pfeifer, Jessica. 2006. “The Use of Information Theory in Biology: Lessons from Social Insects.” Biological Theory 1 (3): 317–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, Sahotra. 1996. “Biological Information: A Skeptical Look at Some Central Dogmas of Molecular Biology.” In The Philosophy and History of Molecular Biology: New Perspectives, 187232. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, Sahotra 2005. “How Genes Encode Information for Phenotypic Traits.” In Molecular Models of Life: Philosophical Papers on Molecular Biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shannon, Claude E., and Weaver, Warren. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Shavit, Ayelet, and Griesemer, James R.. 2011. “Transforming Objects into Data: How Minute Technicalities of Recording ‘Species Location’ Entrench a Basic Challenge for Biodiversity.” In Science in the Context of Application, ed. Carrier, Martin and Nordmann, Alfred. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Shea, Nicholas. 2010. “What’s Transmitted? Inherited Information.” Biology and Philosophy 26 (2): 183–89.Google Scholar
Shea, Nicholas 2013. “Inherited Representations Are Read in Development.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (1): 131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shea, Nicholas, Pen, Ido, and Uller, Tobias. 2011. “Three Epigenetic Information Channels and Their Different Roles in Evolution.” Journal of Evolutionary Biology 24 (6): 1178–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skyrms, Brian. 2010. Signals: Evolution, Learning and Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Star, Susan Leigh, and Griesemer, James R.. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39.” Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stegmann, Ulrich E. 2005. “Genetic Information as Instructional Content.” Philosophy of Science 72 (3): 425–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stegmann, Ulrich E. 2013. “On the ‘Transmission Sense of Information.’Biology and Philosophy 28 (1): 141–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strasser, Bruno J. 2012. “Data-Driven Sciences: From Wonder Cabinets to Electronic Databases.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (1): 8587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, Samuel F., Tishby, Naftali, and Bialek, William. 2007. “Information and Fitness.” Unpublished manuscript. http://arxiv.org/abs/0712.4382.Google Scholar
Walsh, Denis M. 1996. “Fitness and Function.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (4): 553–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, Michael. 2007. “Who Is a Modeler?British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (2): 207–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimsatt, William C. 2006. “Reductionism and Its Heuristics: Making Methodological Reductionism Honest.” Synthese 151 (3): 445–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimsatt, William C. 2007. Re-engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings: Piecewise Approximations to Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, James. 2010. “Causation in Biology: Stability, Specificity, and the Choice of Levels of Explanation.” Biology and Philosophy 25 (3): 287318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar