Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-7ccbd9845f-s2vjv Total loading time: 0.249 Render date: 2023-01-28T16:01:51.388Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Reproduction Expanded: Multigenerational and Multilineal Units of Evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Abstract

Reproduction is central to biology and evolution. Standard concepts of reproduction are drawn from animals. Nonstandard examples of reproduction can be found in unicellular eukaryotes that distribute their reproductive strategies across multiple generations, and in mutualistic systems that combine different modes of reproduction across multiple lineages. Examining multigenerational and multilineal reproducers and how they align fitness has implications for conceptualizing units of evolution.

Type
Complex Life Cycles and Reproduction
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

University of Sydney Bridging Support funded the research for this paper. I am immensely grateful to fellow PSA symposiasts on ‘Complex Lifecycles’ (Peter Godfrey-Smith, Jim Griesemer, Matt Herron), and to Thomas Pradeu for chairing that symposium and commenting on this paper.

References

Bailey, Juliet. 1997. “Building a Plasmodium: Development in the Acellular Slime Mould Physarum polycephalum.BioEssays 19:985–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonfante, Paola, and Genre, Andrea. 2008. “Plants, and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi: An Evolutionary-Developmental Perspective.” Trends in Plant Science 13:492–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, Austin. 2014. “Symbiosis, Selection, and Individuality.” Biology and Philosophy 29:657–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, Frédéric. 2011. “Darwinism without Populations: A More Inclusive Understanding of the ‘Survival of the Fittest.’Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42:106–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bracht, John R., et al. 2013. “Genomes on the Edge: Programmed Genome Instability in Ciliates.” Cell 152:406–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bright, Monika, and Bulgheresi, Silvia. 2010. “A Complex Journey: Transmission of Microbial Symbionts.” Nature Reviews Microbiology 8:218–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, Ellen. 2014. “Origins of Evolutionary Transitions.” Journal of Biosciences 39:303–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, Gregory K. 2012. “Cyclical Parthenogenesis and Viviparity in Aphids as Evolutionary Novelties.” Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution 318:448–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawkins, Richard. 1976/1976. The Selfish Gene. Repr. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Monte, Sylvia, and Rainey, Paul B.. 2014. “Nascent Multicellular Life and the Emergence of Individuality.” Journal of Bioscience 39:237–48.Google ScholarPubMed
Ebert, Dieter. 2013. “The Epidemiology and Evolution of Symbionts with Mixed-Mode Transmission.” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 44:623–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ene, Iuliana V., and Bennett, Richard J.. 2014. “The Cryptic Sexual Strategies of Human Fungal Pathogens.” Nature Reviews Microbiology 12:239–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friesen, Maren L. 2012. “Widespread Fitness Alignment in the Legume–Rhizobia Symbiosis.” New Phytologist 194:10961111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Scott F., McDonald, Emily, Boyle, Nicole, Buttino, Nicholas, Gyi, Lin, Mai, Mark, Prakash, Neelakantan, and Robinson, James. 2010. “Symbiosis as a Source of Selectable Epigenetic Variation.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B 365:671–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2009. Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter 2013. “Darwinian Individuals.” In From Groups to Individuals: Perspectives on Biological Associations and Emerging Individuality, ed. Bouchard, Frédéric and Huneman, Philippe, 1736. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Griesemer, James. 2014. “Reproduction and Scaffolded Developmental Processes: An Integrated Evolutionary Perspective.” In Towards a Theory of Development, ed. Minelli, Alessandro and Pradeu, Thomas, 183201. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herron, Matthew D., Rashidi, Armin, Shelton, Deborah E., and Driscoll, William W.. 2013. “Cellular Differentiation and Individuality in the ‘Minor’ Multicellular Taxa.” Biological Reviews 88:844–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiers, E. Toby, and van der Heijden, Marcel G. A.. 2006. “Mutualistic Stability in the Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis: Exploring Hypotheses of Evolutionary Cooperation.” Ecology 87:1627–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirk, David L. 2001. “Germ–Soma Differentiation in Volvox.Developmental Biology 238:213–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minelli, Alessandro. 2011. “Animal Development, an Open-Ended Segment of Life.” Biological Theory 6:415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mira, Alex, and Moran, Nancy A.. 2002. “Estimating Population Size and Transmission Bottlenecks in Maternally Transmitted Endosymbiotic Bacteria.” Microbial Ecology 44:137–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Malley, Maureen A. 2014. Philosophy of Microbiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phadke, Sujal S., and Zufall, Rebecca A.. 2009. “Rapid Diversification of Mating Systems in Ciliates.” Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 98:187–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, David S., and Sober, Elliott. 1989. “Reviving the Superorganism.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 136:337–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolf, Yuri, and Koonin, Eugene V.. 2013. “Genome Reduction as the Dominant Mode of Evolution.” BioEssays 35:829–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yubuki, Naoji, and Leander, Brian S.. 2013. “Evolution of Microtubule Organizing Centers across the Tree of Eukaryotes.” Plant Journal 75:230–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Reproduction Expanded: Multigenerational and Multilineal Units of Evolution
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Reproduction Expanded: Multigenerational and Multilineal Units of Evolution
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Reproduction Expanded: Multigenerational and Multilineal Units of Evolution
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *