Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wjfd9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T01:00:33.685Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response to Howson and Laudan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Deborah G. Mayo
Deborah G. Mayo*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
*
†Send reprint requests to the author, Department of Philosophy, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061–0126.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Reply
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 64 , Issue 2 , June 1997 , pp. 323 - 333
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Howson, C. (1997), “Error Probabilities in Error”, Philosophy of Science 64 (Proceedings): forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laudan, L. (1977), Progress and Its Problems. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mayo, D. (1996), Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayo, D. (1997), “Error Statistics and Learning From Error: Making a Virtue of Necessity”, Philosophy of Science 64 (Proceedings): forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar