Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T02:31:20.851Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Action, Purpose, and Consciousness Among the Computers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Richmond Campbell  and
Alexander Rosenberg
Richmond Campbell
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University
Alexander Rosenberg
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 40 , Issue 4 , December 1973 , pp. 547 - 557
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 by The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

We are indebted to D. Braybrooke, N. Mackintosh, M. Fearon, J. Gery, and S. Burns for observations and remarks without which this paper would not have been written. Our thanks are also due to the referees of this journal.

References

REFERENCES

[1] Davidson, D. “The Logical Form of Action Sentences.” in The Logic of Decision and Action. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburg Press, 1966.Google Scholar
[2] Rosenblueth, A. and Wiener, N. “Purposeful and Non-Purposeful Behavior.” Philosophy of Science 17 (1950): 318–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Sayre, K. M. Consciousness: A Philosophic Study of Minds and Machines. New York: Random House, 1969.Google Scholar
[4] Scheffler, I. “Thoughts on Teleology.” in Purpose in Nature. Edited by Canfield, J. V. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1966.Google Scholar
[5] Taylor, R. “Comments on a Mechanistic Conception of Purposefulness.” Philosophy of Science 17 (1950): 310–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar